kathainbowen
New member
Ok, so, while perusing my local LFS, I chanced upon a rather intriguing little clownfish in a tank away from the others. It was in with two other perfectly normal false perculas and one false percula that had the classic basic patterning of a "picasso" clown. While I would have loved the "picasso" perc, it looked sickly after being picked on by pretty much all of the other three clowns.
However, the intriguing little fish in question was a rather unique little clownfish, looking about halfway between a standard false percula and a "picasso" percula. However, it wasn't quite all the way there. The third stripe, located on the caudal penduncle, lacks the classic, sharp black border of a standard false percula, and bears a small smudge of orange in the white, which appears truer to the "picasso" percula. The middle bar also extends further foward at the buldge that on the standard false percula, but not as far as the "picasso." The top of that bar also extends further back than on the standard false percula. The front bar is utterly normal. It's just like I said, it looks about half way between a "picasso" and a standard.
By now, you're probably as sick of seeing the quotation marks as I am.
However, there's a point behind the quotation marks. See, I'm very curious about how this "picasso" morph of the false percula came to be. My understanding of it is that, like misbarring, the trait is a recessive quality to the false percula. However, misbarring is something that has been noted and tied closely with imbreeding, especially excessive imbreeding of clownfish. So, did the "picasso," "jigsaw," and "snowflake" patternings develop as a result of imbreeding with clownfish in aquaculture facilities that was left to go unchecked, or what happened? How did it come to be?
Ok, so I'm starting to go off topic.
What I was really curious about, for all you guys out there, was if anyone had a direct understanding of the breeding implecations of certain aspects in clownfish. Has anyone had a chance to track and see the probabilities of certain individual aspects of patterning in clownfish to see what the resulting offspring might look like?
.....???
:reading:
However, the intriguing little fish in question was a rather unique little clownfish, looking about halfway between a standard false percula and a "picasso" percula. However, it wasn't quite all the way there. The third stripe, located on the caudal penduncle, lacks the classic, sharp black border of a standard false percula, and bears a small smudge of orange in the white, which appears truer to the "picasso" percula. The middle bar also extends further foward at the buldge that on the standard false percula, but not as far as the "picasso." The top of that bar also extends further back than on the standard false percula. The front bar is utterly normal. It's just like I said, it looks about half way between a "picasso" and a standard.
By now, you're probably as sick of seeing the quotation marks as I am.
However, there's a point behind the quotation marks. See, I'm very curious about how this "picasso" morph of the false percula came to be. My understanding of it is that, like misbarring, the trait is a recessive quality to the false percula. However, misbarring is something that has been noted and tied closely with imbreeding, especially excessive imbreeding of clownfish. So, did the "picasso," "jigsaw," and "snowflake" patternings develop as a result of imbreeding with clownfish in aquaculture facilities that was left to go unchecked, or what happened? How did it come to be?
Ok, so I'm starting to go off topic.
What I was really curious about, for all you guys out there, was if anyone had a direct understanding of the breeding implecations of certain aspects in clownfish. Has anyone had a chance to track and see the probabilities of certain individual aspects of patterning in clownfish to see what the resulting offspring might look like?
.....???
:reading: