Pufferpunk
New member
Are you adding it only to the amount you are using to top off? Because if you are like, adding it to a 5g bucket, the VC will dissapate, a few hours.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12712976#post12712976 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Jeff
I think you may be right. They are both most likely carbon sources. I achieved completely different results with each thing though which makes me believe they may be doing different things.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12713959#post12713959 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by montanabay
I really think we are off track thinking of ascorbic acid as a carbon source. I have been researching this a bit now and have found no scientific evidence that ascorbic acid or its products post oxidation as a useful carbon source for any organism. Ascorbic acid is a sugar acid, but that does not mean it can be used as an energy source or carbon source, whether whole or oxidized.
What is known, is that ascorbate (read ascorbic acid or vitamin C) plays a critical role in the metabolic process of photosynthetic organisms, as a component in the antioxidant system, that protect against oxidative damage resulting from aerobic metabolism, photosynthesis and a range of pollutants.
It is also known that ascorbate is a cofactor with hydroxylase enzymes. Ascorbate oxidase (the product of ascorbate and hydroxylase enzyme) is known to control cellular growth. High ascorbate oxidase activity is also associated with rapidly expanding cells.
So in sort, ascorbate plays an important function as an antioxidant defense (oxygen related toxins produced from photosynthesis) and as an important function in growth regulation of cells.
Also keep in mind that I focused on the function of ascorbate in photosynthetic organisms, in mammals and other animals it also plays a critical role in enzymatic reactions which is why we call it a Vitamin and the functional range that ascorbate is used in metabolic processes is extremely vast among species.
This information was summarized from peer reviewed scientific journals. I did not add the citations in fear that people would turned off by it as being "too much", but if you would like more info, references, etc please let me know.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12713690#post12713690 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Jeff
Two and a half months. I have been off of vitamin c for the same amount of time.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12715105#post12715105 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Peter Eichler
Ascorbic acid is a carbon compound closely related to glucose. I'd like to hear you explain why you don't think it's a carbon source...
Do a single one of those peer reviewed scientific journals relate to marine organisms in any way. If they do, in particular do they relate to corals, zoanthids, or zoxanthellae in any way?
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12720546#post12720546 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by montanabay
Follow up on ascorbate and collagen production:
Here is a paper with the finding that ascorbic acid significantly increases the production of collagen in both a soft and hard coral. The two species in this article are Xenia elongate (pulsing xenia) and Montipora digitata, both common corals kept by reefers.
So ascorbate could be acting on two fronts. 1) An antioxidant that neutralizes toxic oxygen radicals produced in photosynthesis and 2) In growth, acting as a stimulant in collagen production, the major structural component of soft corals.
Here is the citation, again if you would like the pdf please let me know.
Helman, Yael, Natale, Frank, Sherrell, Robert M., et al. Extracellular matrix production and calcium carbonate precipitation by coral cells in vitro 2008
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/105/1/54
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12722758#post12722758 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Pufferpunk
Is is possible it's acting as both a carbon source & antioxident/collagen rebuilder?