Gogandantess
New member
I'd take a pair of Scribbles and a Flame Wrasse pair instead. :frog:
As this is the first/second specimen offered for sale in the USA I think it's fair to say that 99.9% of board posters will not have seen the mask in real life. This also goes for the people probably looking to buy the fish from LADD. That being said we have seen it in pictures, so we have a fair idea of what to expect.
Honestly I think people seriously allow rarity to influence their opinions on beauty in a significant manner. If you showed This fish to a novice next to half a dozen large more common angels this would be one of the last picked out of the lineup on looks alone. Now we know it's rare, it is valued more highly, but I don't think that we should use that as an excuse to pretend that it looks better. It's being sold for rarity, not looks. If it's easier to justify the price by pretending it's the prettiest fish to ever hit private aquaria, whatever floats your boat.
Side note, just tested the theory with my wife. Showed her adult pictures of four large angels, this was the least favorite. Not even close, and she knows nothing about the availability of any of the fish. I think most of us would experience similar results if asking other non-specialists.
I'm not saying that this fish could not look nice in an appropriate tank, with the right tank mates. I'm saying that for less money I think (and most people seem to think) you could get a better looking fish, with equally interesting character. Or at least a very similar looking fish.
I am not bashing those who choose to buy this fish, as it's their money and they can do what they please with it, but let's be honest about why this fish is so interesting (rarity) and not try and make excuses to justify our wants and needs. I would pay more for some fish for other reasons, and I can't say everyone agrees with me, but I like to think I'm honest when explaining it. I'd pay more for a pair of Fu Manchu lions than a pair of dwarf fuzzies. Many people would not agree with that, but it's what I like. I don't need to pretend that the Fu lions would be more active (unlikely the case) to justify my decision.
Side note, just tested the theory with my wife. Showed her adult pictures of four large angels, this was the least favorite. Not even close, and she knows nothing about the availability of any of the fish. I think most of us would experience similar results if asking other non-specialists.
You should do the same thing and take your wife to the nordstrom designer purse section and whick one she picks. I bet it won't be the cheap commonly seen ones :lol:
J/k, but that is what I thought about when I read the above statement.
Once again, its whatever floats your bloat. I keep a pair of "expensive bi-colors" as many under educated and novice people have called them through out the years. For me, its more about the subtle items of fish and their individual markings.
I personally do not that the space for a True Personifer so to me, they are just another awesome specimen that I can appreciate as a fellow hobbyist. I've never understood the "I am better than you and your opinion in fish is crap" approach.
When people talk about pricing, I just wish people would just stick to the topic. I don't come over to your house and look at your lexus coupe and tell you that your were an absolute fool for overpaying for a toyota.
With that said, I appreciate fish for the beauty of the fish and the fact that someone will enjoy these fish on a daily basis and not the price tag. I have no problem saying, please keep threads like these on topic or don't post at all. What some people admire might not be the same thing as your neighbor and what makes a person think they are better than their neighbor.
Soooo, did I miss something or did LADD forget to put a "1" in front of the price they put the personifer up for tonight? http://www.liveaquaria.com/diversde...ref=4282&subref=AI&cmpid=E-_-TR-_-DDN-_-PRDCT