Don't need to, the are way too many who have already done so and reported their failure.
maybe you work for ecotech or own stock in them?
I was wondering about the failure rate of the Jaebo's so I turned to Google. From what I have been able to find, they are very good cost effective pumps that happen an above average failure and defect rate. On the other hand, the Vortechs are also very good pumps with a much lower failure rate, but a much higher price tag.
But at the end of the debate, it comes down to individual preference.
It's like comparing an M-16 to an AK-47. Expensive, accurate, high-maintenance and under-powered verses cheap, in-accurate, but rugged with high stopping power.
Different strokes for different folks.
The Jebao pumps that most are using(the WP-25)have been out 1 1/2 years. There are a good share of failures, I would say more than the average Tunze or Vortech....though not excessive. It would be interesting to see where they stand in 2-3 years. I know when you have a problem with them, it is the retailer that steps in and sends you a new one with the cost of shipping added.
Compare that to a Tunze or Vortech......2 years and 1 year of direct manufacturer warranty. Tunzes can last many years....8-10 years is pretty common. I have never had one fail. Plus both will step up and help you out years afterwards. I have no personal experience with Ecotech service, but I know Tunze USA will even heavily discount the price of a new pump to replace a pump that is many years old. I have had Roger send me used parts at zero cahrge(only shipping) to patch up old pumps I have had laying around. Plus these 2 companies.....Ecotech and Tunze....actually create products, rather than copy. But price is all that matters to some.
Well that sucks!
I see the initial price is 300-400$!!!! lol
Kinda tired of the markup in this hobby...
Funny thing is, when I used the FX5 canister for a bit, I could easily get a gyre flow like this by positioning the output from the can across the top of the water length-wise in the tank.![]()
Sorry you feel at the spreading of the experience of others is polluting the hobby. Did you know that most of the information that has disseminated in this hobby is spread just that way? I don't really expect you to understand that, you haven't been in the hobby long enough, but you should be bright enough to see that. I am not a chemist, but I have sense enough to learn what the chemists in this hobby have experienced. I have also owned enough bottom tier equipment to understand the difference. I could add my 30+ years of experience in manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution, but I get the feeling you may not understand he relevance of that either.
I won't argue this with you beyond this, you either get it or you don't. This same scenario has played more times than I can remember over the years.
I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to agree with the others. You've never used either product being discussed, yet you speak very matter of factly about them. Regurgitating YOUR interpretation of other people's forum posts as your own experience is not helpful. You are only serving to muddy the discussion.
Even if you are ultimately right it's still not helpful. Reaching the right conclusion for the wrong reasons is extraordinarily confusing for people. And it in no way enriches the discussion.
Nothing wrong with commenting on what you've read, but you need to make it abundantly clear that is what you are doing.
In that light, I do agree that it seems like there is a disproportionately high failure rate on Jebao pumps based on various other threads and people recounting their experience. So, I agree with you in that sense but I don't think it is helpful to pontificate any further.
It seems like 9/10 people that talk about having Jebaos also talk about having problems within the first year. I wouldn't personally put anything on a reef tank with that kind of failure rate. As with most things, you get what you pay for.