VHO Lighting

harleybmw73

New member
I'm setting up a 75g tank, transfering from a 46g, I'll be putting my torch, frogspawn, wall hammer and bubble coral in there with my live rock and fish. I'd like to get away from pc and am looking at a VHO retro kit. I've got a choice, so am I better going with 2 or 4 bulbs? The difference is 220 - 440 watts. I don't want to "under" light the tank, but I don't want to burn up the corals either.

Tracy
 
I have 6 bulbs crammed in the canopy on my 75. There are 2 ballasts (both on timers) so 2 bulbs come on first, then the other 4 on the Icecap 660 come on an hour later so there isn't the shock of all that light at once. I reverse the order at night - it's kinda a dawn/dusk effect. The bulbs are by UV lighting (formerly URI) - 3 actinic white, 2 super actinic and 1 aquasun. HTH
 
I used a 4 bulb VHO setup on my 55 when it was running. The bulb combination I liked was 2 UV Lighting (URI) Actinic Whites and 2 UV Lighting (URI) Super Actinics. This gave me a nice white look w/ a little blue. I ran the lights on a URI A-4 (IceCap 660) ballast.
 
I really liked the 90 and 75 I saw with 6 VHO's (the 50/50 mix of actinics and whatever those aquasuns were) the acros really liked their lights too. but yeah, the fat diameter VHO's may be becoming some old-tech stuff now, along with limewood airstones
 
Old-tech ...maybe . but the T-5's will have to come down in price a HUGE amount to make me change. I just installed 2 - 6 foot VHO's on my tank to help the metal halides.

Bulb replacement costs were the deciding factor. 2 bulbs versus many more bulbs at roughly the same price per bulb.
 
I don't understand how T5's would be a "HUGE" price increase? As far as I can tell, VHO's and T5's are roughly the same price per bulb (~$20). And T5 cost less to run be being lower wattage. I have a 6' foot tank as well, and have a single IceCap 660 running 3 5' bulbs.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10247423#post10247423 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by mkarston
I don't understand how T5's would be a "HUGE" price increase? As far as I can tell, VHO's and T5's are roughly the same price per bulb (~$20). And T5 cost less to run be being lower wattage. I have a 6' foot tank as well, and have a single IceCap 660 running 3 5' bulbs.

It is the reflectors, they double the cost for the most part... 20 bucks for the bulb, and 20 bucks for the reflector....
 
I have yet to see a T5 that will match the color of a URI Super Actinic VHO. Nothing fluoresces like a actinic VHO.
 
Thats what I am talking about....How many T-5's to equal the pop of a Actinic VHO ?

I don't run them for the light, but for the glow it gives corals
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10248538#post10248538 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Reefghoul
It is the reflectors, they double the cost for the most part... 20 bucks for the bulb, and 20 bucks for the reflector....

Bulb replacement costs were the deciding factor

Reflectors do not have to be replaced with the bulbs...
 
go to the t-5 thread in the lighting forum you will learn more about them
there are t-5 actinic that work as well as the vho
of course vho ballest will fire t-5's so you could put one vho and the rest t-5 if you like
also they say you cant grow sps with vho lighting thats not true
i have a friend that has almost all sps in his 60 gal and they do fine
he put mirrors above the lights and he gets alot of reflection
 
Back
Top