For years and years I've heard that fresh water feeder fish are not adequate food for salt water fish. Is this based on science? Or is it based on assumption? Can anyone provide scientific documentation one way or the other?
I ask because it seems to me, with salt water fishes' osmoregulation, their flesh is no saltier than fresh water fish. So their flesh should be no different. If salt is not the issue, what is? What are the differences that make fresh water feeders inadequate?
And what about mollies? These are brackish to full strength seawater fish. They eat salt water algae, even dinos and cyanobacteria, which I have personally witnessed. These would seem to be ideal, being prolific live bearers, effectively turning algae into feeder fish.
Is this a long-standing myth that needs to be debunked?
I ask because it seems to me, with salt water fishes' osmoregulation, their flesh is no saltier than fresh water fish. So their flesh should be no different. If salt is not the issue, what is? What are the differences that make fresh water feeders inadequate?
And what about mollies? These are brackish to full strength seawater fish. They eat salt water algae, even dinos and cyanobacteria, which I have personally witnessed. These would seem to be ideal, being prolific live bearers, effectively turning algae into feeder fish.
Is this a long-standing myth that needs to be debunked?