Zoa/paly ID project -- Open discussion for possibilities

I'm pretty sure I know exactly why... it's because of threads like this, where the OP asks a simple question and gets attacked by the mob. It happens again and again and again. If we all spent half the energy it takes to hijack all these threads to spout our anti-name game sentiments and used that energy to answer the threads Mucho is referring to, I believe we'd see this forum flourish again.

This anti-name game mob has ruined this forum... plain and simple.

Nick


No offense Nick, but I can't honestly say I agree with that. If that were true, they would still log in, but just not reply. Or, they would at least log in to check their possible PM's. Usually people who don't log in just come to lurk/read, look at the pictures and ID's, do some reading of the threads, or just from other sites and maybe they don't like RC or want to be seen here, or maybe it's just easier not to log in. All of those reasons are fine I guess, but I guess I have always felt this way. If you can take something from this forum, then I think you should at lease try to give a little something back. Hey, maybe I'm wrong, but that's just me.


As for this thread, and I have already spoken to the OP personally about this thread, but he did indeed open the floor up with a question on, "Zoa/Paly ID Project, Open for discussion". I think that's exactly what happened. Rokie was the OP, and I didn't see him attacked. I know someone else who was, but not Rokie. I just don't see this thread hijacked, if so, I think the OP who is a mod would have intervened and he did issue a warning for cooler heads to prevail. To be honest, every thread goes a bit off topic, it happens sometimes. I use to hate it myself, but have come to accept that it is going to happen.

This issue and many others like it will never go away, just as many feel names and high prices will never go away. There are 25 thread spaces on each page, I see one topic on this issue and those like it on each page of the next 3 pages, that is not a lot. Often we will have redundant topics on a single page, sometimes the same topic everyday, hey, it happens folks. I just think we all need to be civil and respectful and you're right, we need to channel some of this energy to the forum and the many questions which go unanswered along with what we can all contribute.

I don't think the forum is ruined, I think cooler heads need to prevail. Lets all speak our collective minds and pump the breaks on the heated adjectives. :wavehand:


What-ah-yah-say ?


OK, back on topic.:beer:


Mucho
 
Last edited:
Wasn't going to say anything in this thread/forum anymore, but couldn't let this comment pass without throwing up my $.02 worth. No offense intended organism, as I agree with most of what you have to say.

Thing is the vast majority of zoanthids have the same or similar needs, all of which can be found by searching the forums, and most don't look like the "original" in most tanks. There's no specific need for each specific zoanthid, it would just be a marketplace where everyone that has available frags posts pictures under the guise of information.

My humble opinion on the above . . . while many zoanthids have the same or similar needs, the simple truth is that not all of them do. By promoting this position, we contribute to an idea that I absolutely hate; zoanthids are a good beginner coral because they all have the same basic needs and they grow like weeds (not at all true IMO/E). Further, by promoting this view, we IMO actually stiffle the desire/need to answer threads or participate in informational discussions. Why bother? They all have the same basic needs as every other coral, and if someone would just search basic tank parameters, 99% of their questions could be/would be answered. IMO, by stating/using the same retoric over and over again, all we are doing is stiffling the desire for participation in this forum. Sorry if I appear to be ranting, just had to share my opinion on the subject.
 
My humble opinion on the above . . . while many zoanthids have the same or similar needs, the simple truth is that not all of them do. By promoting this position, we contribute to an idea that I absolutely hate; zoanthids are a good beginner coral because they all have the same basic needs and they grow like weeds (not at all true IMO/E). Further, by promoting this view, we IMO actually stiffle the desire/need to answer threads or participate in informational discussions. Why bother? They all have the same basic needs as every other coral, and if someone would just search basic tank parameters, 99% of their questions could be/would be answered. IMO, by stating/using the same retoric over and over again, all we are doing is stiffling the desire for participation in this forum. Sorry if I appear to be ranting, just had to share my opinion on the subject.

That's a good point, I was thinking about the same thing yesterday too, but I think the issue is that most zoanthids really do have the same care, some are just more prone to problems than others. Like the African blue zoanthids and some Indo palys tend to come in with this powdery brown fungus on the stems that the majority of hobbyists don't know how to treat properly, so automatically those get classified as hard to keep or that they die easily when it's actually not the zoanthid but the fungus.

Salinity is huge for zoanthids too and can cause the same fungus out of nowhere... I feel like the info threads would go better overall if instead of names or colors we just focused on location, along with what's a common problem from each location and how to treat them. Like the fiji ones tend to come in with that white nasty smelling fungus, solomon islands ones have more pests overall which makes them look closed all the time but they're actually being eaten, etc... Either way it's going to be the same kind of deal though: dip, shake, dip, low light and high flow.
 
I think Scopus Tang has a valid point.

Also, to reply to the op, let me quantify what i think Mucho is talking about by showing some comparisons between names and overpricing.
I'll show this by posting links to various sites selling corals (zoas, LPS, sps).
In the example I'm trying to show that I can buy the same zoa for 70.00 at one vendor, and another seller will be selling for 40.00 per polyp".
I can buy a COLONY of them for 70.00...and a POLYP of it on another site for the same price.
Same zoas.
Can you spot the named coral? Can you spot how the named coral is more expensive than the colony of the same that are unnamed?

If you can, than you are a smart consumer *wink*
http://www.extremecorals.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Category_Code=Zoos

http://www.worldwidecorals.com/p-859-candy-apple-reds.aspx

To be clear, I am NOT focusing on these two vendors. It's one example.
I'll leave it up to YOU all to find more vendors. I guarantee, you'll find more BS.
 
I'm pretty sure I know exactly why... it's because of threads like this, where the OP asks a simple question and gets attacked by the mob. It happens again and again and again. If we all spent half the energy it takes to hijack all these threads to spout our anti-name game sentiments and used that energy to answer the threads Mucho is referring to, I believe we'd see this forum flourish again.

This anti-name game mob has ruined this forum... plain and simple.

Nick

Zoa/paly ID project -- Open discussion for possibilities

If you guys/gals want to do something like this, and there is something the staff can do to assist/facilitate, let us know. I think the dislike and 5-10x duplicate names we're seeing on many "ID" sites is making them less and less valuable.

Thoughts?


I believe we were answering the OP's question

Nothing wrong with that. I threw it out there as it's been mentioned multiple times. If you guys aren't interested in the idea and project, then it is what it is. I don't personally care either way.

The OP seems to be okay with our replies


Zoanthid Information Draft - Reef Central Online Community

We have this thread already stickied. Tons of really great information. Last replied to 12/16/2009.


Some very good info on care and ID pretty much sums everything up.

http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2003/2/inverts

Aquarium Invertebrates: Zoanthids: Polyps As Cute As A Button
By Julian Sprung
I have always been and will always be impressed by such common things as "œbutton polyps," the many-hued and mostly simple to care for zoanthids.

Contents
Genera
Reproduction
Competitive interactions
Zoanthus
Protopalythoa
Palythoa
Isaurus
Yellow Polyps
Acrozoanthus
Neozoanthus
Parazoanthus and Epizoanthus
Predators
A word of caution about Zoanthids
References And Suggested Reading


Another very informative link

http://animal-world.com/encyclo/reef/zoanthids/grnbutton.php

Everything you need to know about polyps care. If you need more information perhaps the person with the designer polyp should use the species along with the "Name" Certainly would be a heck of a lot more informative trying to access their care. Saves the person that's trying to answer them from having to figure out what the actual polyp is.


My humble opinion on the above . . . while many zoanthids have the same or similar needs, the simple truth is that not all of them do. By promoting this position, we contribute to an idea that I absolutely hate; zoanthids are a good beginner coral because they all have the same basic needs and they grow like weeds (not at all true IMO/E). Further, by promoting this view, we IMO actually stiffle the desire/need to answer threads or participate in informational discussions. Why bother? They all have the same basic needs as every other coral, and if someone would just search basic tank parameters, 99% of their questions could be/would be answered. IMO, by stating/using the same retoric over and over again, all we are doing is stiffling the desire for participation in this forum. Sorry if I appear to be ranting, just had to share my opinion on the subject
.


My question to you is are they more difficult because they're a fresh cut frags shipped the next day or because were not for filling some of their basic needs? Perhaps and most likely it's a combination of the 2.

I know and understand what your saying but unfortunately the rhetoric holds true in most cases. Stability plain and simple. I honestly feel that tank raise-aqua cultured coral of any type are the easiest to adapt to most systems provided and this is the most important aspect your system is stable and the frag itself was fragged and healed correctly.

I can give you a general generic answer to the usual generic question: my new designer polyps won't open, where does everyone place theirs? So the answer more times then not is I put my designer ployps in a low light, medium flow area. But what does that mean exactly? You and I may understand what is meant by it but some newbie won't. In my system it would mean 30 inches from the light on the sand bed in between 2 outcroppings of rock. But again, their system most likely is different then mine and worse yet if isn't stable and it's a fresh cut frag it won't matter where they place it. More likely then not the polyps will remain closed. They must know their own system and get it stable first in order to succeed. These are things we should be stressing IMHO

There are still so many things to discuss when it comes to the care and health of these amazing creatures. We should be sharing the proper techniques for fragging,gluing and healing, and how to spot health problems. Or how about what nutrients are needed if you're using a carbon source? We as experienced reef keepers know that there's no one answer to why. All we can do is guide through experience and give basic care tips as to what worked for us. Unfortunately what works for me may not work for you. So see there's still tons to discuss.

~Dee~
 
Kichimark will vouche for this as I spoke to a college student in L.A. who was taken to the bank for hundreds of dollars for 12 polyps, they all died. All were one and two polyp frags, all on white plugs, it happens. I have spoken to dozens upon dozens of people who have personally contacted me with this same scenario. Don't tell me it isn't true, you may not want to admit that it is true, but it is.


Man that situation still bothers me. That seller had low morals and no class doing that to that kid. I really hope they come back to the hobby and join or visit a local club. I will definitely hook him up.




I see Muchos point on how this can destroy the hobby. I used to breed leopard geckos. I would breed for color combinations and buy what I liked. As I got more into the hobby a new morph came out and flooded the market. People started breeding geckos before they even understood genetics and care. This destroyed the market and the hobbyists like me. I would sell the babies to pay for the food but since people were buying geckos from mass producers who flooded the market with fancy named geckos, we had no way to support our hobby and we had to sell most of our geckos (still have our original 4). The named animals split the hobby in half and we lost a lot of experienced breeders. Do we want this to happen in our hobby?

I didn't know you bred geckos Mallorie. I used to breed crested geckos a while back. My gf got me a pair last week and I fell in love again. I did some research on new techniques and man they have new morphs/names now for them too. When I saw that it reminded me of the corals haha.
 
Salinity is huge for zoanthids too and can cause the same fungus out of nowhere... I feel like the info threads would go better overall if instead of names or colors we just focused on location, along with what's a common problem from each location and how to treat them. Like the fiji ones tend to come in with that white nasty smelling fungus, solomon islands ones have more pests overall which makes them look closed all the time but they're actually being eaten, etc... Either way it's going to be the same kind of deal though: dip, shake, dip, low light and high flow.

I agree that origins vs. names would be an excellent resource, and while the overall info would be similar, helping those who need the info would go a long ways to cutting down on the "plz help" threads.

http://animal-world.com/encyclo/reef/zoanthids/grnbutton.php

Everything you need to know about polyps care. If you need more information perhaps the person with the designer polyp should use the species along with the "Name" Certainly would be a heck of a lot more informative trying to access their care. Saves the person that's trying to answer them from having to figure out what the actual polyp is.


.


My question to you is are they more difficult because they're a fresh cut frags shipped the next day or because were not for filling some of their basic needs? Perhaps and most likely it's a combination of the 2.

I know and understand what your saying but unfortunately the rhetoric holds true in most cases. Stability plain and simple. I honestly feel that tank raise-aqua cultured coral of any type are the easiest to adapt to most systems provided and this is the most important aspect your system is stable and the frag itself was fragged and healed correctly.

I can give you a general generic answer to the usual generic question: my new designer polyps won't open, where does everyone place theirs? So the answer more times then not is I put my designer ployps in a low light, medium flow area. But what does that mean exactly? You and I may understand what is meant by it but some newbie won't. In my system it would mean 30 inches from the light on the sand bed in between 2 outcroppings of rock. But again, their system most likely is different then mine and worse yet if isn't stable and it's a fresh cut frag it won't matter where they place it. More likely then not the polyps will remain closed. They must know their own system and get it stable first in order to succeed. These are things we should be stressing IMHO

There are still so many things to discuss when it comes to the care and health of these amazing creatures. We should be sharing the proper techniques for fragging,gluing and healing, and how to spot health problems. Or how about what nutrients are needed if you're using a carbon source? We as experienced reef keepers know that there's no one answer to why. All we can do is guide through experience and give basic care tips as to what worked for us. Unfortunately what works for me may not work for you. So see there's still tons to discuss.

~Dee~

Dee I'm talking about actual healthy corals, not fresh cut frags. While I agree with you that stability is the key, and many have similar requirements, there are subtle differences in what makes individual types thrive. I'd use the word species, but the simple truth is that so very little is truly know about scientific classification of these particular corals, that to try to reference scientific names is virtually impossible. I agree that a thread that focused on health issues, perhaps focusing on the area of origion and common diseases in polyps from those areas would be an excellent direction to go, rather than a thread focused on designer or common names. Please don't mistake what I said for meaning that I don't think there isn't plenty of topics of discussion. Mucho and I have exchanged PMs and emails several times on this very topic, as well as the whole lack of participation issue. My point was simply that by reciting the rhetoric, we give the impression that there is no need for further discussion, when in fact, as you point out, nothing could be further from the truth. I'm just trying to point out that we may in fact be cutting our own throats here.

the link I quoted above is an excellent example of what I'm talking about regarding scientific classification - sure the author has posted up a nice little list of scientific names in the article, but are there pictures of any of the IDed species shown? Nope. Why? Species ID of the members of family Zoanthidae that we keep in our aquariums are few and far between. There are pictures of wild colonies to be found if you google, but trying to cordinate that with the zoas we typically keep in our aquariums is virtually impossible. I posted a thread requesting pictures of Z. sociatus, supposedly one of the most common zoas in our tanks - guess how many responses I got? About three, and most admitted that they weren't even that they were posting the right thing, they were guessing based on the description. The author in the above article is referring all zoas/palys as button polyps, which doesn't help the issue, given that most of use with experience in the hobby, ID button polyps as members of the protopaly or palythoa genus (depending on which system of classification you currently adhere to) rather than the zoanthus genus.
 
Last edited:
Dee I'm talking about actual healthy corals, not fresh cut frags. While I agree with you that stability is the key, and many have similar requirements, there are subtle differences in what makes individual types thrive. I'd use the word species, but the simple truth is that so very little is truly know about scientific classification of these particular corals, that to try to reference scientific names is virtually impossible. I agree that a thread that focused on health issues, perhaps focusing on the area of origion and common diseases in polyps from those areas would be an excellent direction to go, rather than a thread focused on designer or common names. Please don't mistake what I said for meaning that I don't think there isn't plenty of topics of discussion. Mucho and I have exchanged PMs and emails several times on this very topic, as well as the whole lack of participation issue. My point was simply that by reciting the rhetoric, we give the impression that there is no need for further discussion, when in fact, as you point out, nothing could be further from the truth. I'm just trying to point out that we may in fact be cutting our own throats here. Again, simply for what its worth.

Perfect we are in agreement for the most part;) I guess in addition what I'm trying to say that perhaps part of the problem is we forget that some of our references and suggestions are given in the generic sense and perhaps we should elaborate. Instead of just saying med flow low light explain what you mean by those terms. There are quite a few people new to zoa care that this could help a bit.


the link I quoted above is an excellent example of what I'm talking about regarding scientific classification - sure the author has posted up a nice little list of scientific names in the article, but are there pictures of any of the IDed species shown? Nope. Why? Species ID of the members of family Zoanthidae that we keep in our aquariums are few and far between. There are pictures of wild colonies to be found if you google, but trying to cordinate that with the zoas we typically keep in our aquariums is virtually impossible. I posted a thread requesting pictures of Z. sociatus, supposedly one of the most common zoas in our tanks - guess how many responses I got? About three, and most admitted that they weren't even that they were posting the right thing, they were guessing based on the description. The author in the above article is referring all zoas/palys as button polyps, which doesn't help the issue, given that most of use with experience in the hobby, ID button polyps as members of the protopaly or palythoa genus (depending on which system of classification you currently adhere to) rather than the zoanthus genus.

I thought the link I posted was as good as far as teaching most the basics.
Also I'm not talking going crazy with exact species perhaps I should have used the word genera. IMO you should at the very least be able to identify the difference between Zoanthus, Protopalythoa, and Palythoa because this where some of the subtle difference come into play. So if we must use designer names perhaps knowing what genera would help when trying to solve a health issues, problems, and care.

I've got my granddaugter over and unfortunately at 19 months she needs my undivided attention

But other then that:beer:

~Dee~
 
Last edited:
Wasn't going to say anything in this thread/forum anymore, but couldn't let this comment pass without throwing up my $.02 worth. No offense intended organism, as I agree with most of what you have to say.



My humble opinion on the above . . . while many zoanthids have the same or similar needs, the simple truth is that not all of them do. By promoting this position, we contribute to an idea that I absolutely hate; zoanthids are a good beginner coral because they all have the same basic needs and they grow like weeds (not at all true IMO/E). Further, by promoting this view, we IMO actually stiffle the desire/need to answer threads or participate in informational discussions. Why bother? They all have the same basic needs as every other coral, and if someone would just search basic tank parameters, 99% of their questions could be/would be answered. IMO, by stating/using the same retoric over and over again, all we are doing is stiffling the desire for participation in this forum. Sorry if I appear to be ranting, just had to share my opinion on the subject.




Clarification

1. Zoas and Palys are not easy to keep, they can be if one knows what they're doing.

2. Scopus, you are not RANTING buddy, I just kinda wish everyone would stop saying that. ;) You are just respectfully stating your opinion whether for or against others. That's all I see and again there's no harm or foul in that at all.

I don't see rhetoric. It's not rhetoric when the same questions are asked and discussed and answered in this forum everyday? It's not rhetoric when people come here and post their issues without posting the background needed for us to answer those questions. It's not rhetoric when the same type of threads, discussions and opinions show up day after day, week after week and month after month. It's the nature of the beast, or should I say, of public forums. I think we exacerbate these issues with the labels and adjectives we use, which have been used by others in this thread, which only serve to fan the flames of discourse. I keep hearing, "oh no, not this topic again", or, "here we go again", when everything posted in this forum and on the net is "here we go again". That's just the way it is and no one is going to agree with everything written here. Often when I see something which I don't like to see, tired of seeing or reading, don't agree with or choose not to involve myself in, I just look away and won't reply to it. I will never tell anyone they can't talk about it and I'm not saying you did, but others have.

3. Back to the original topic of creating a DB for classifications of all the polyps out there. To be very honest, I feel that it can possibly be very detrimental if newbies rely on this list for their captive care. Relying on a list via classification can never replace buying a good reference book, doing some simple research, testing, watching, monitoring and documenting your tank accordingly.

I have already stated my opinion on it so I won't go there again. If somebody wants to do that, then go ahead I say. Instead, I want to create a scenario and anyone for or against can answer these questions.


1st scenario

If a reefer, newbie or oldbie :D, it doesn't matter, has a 70 gallon reef tank, with 20 colonies or frags of zoas and palys and 50% of the rest of his tank was softies, and those 20 zoa colonies were 5 from the Caribbean, 5 are Indo, 5 from Australia and 5 from Figi and one colony of let's say....the Africans that Organism mentioned. My question is this, how will knowing their classification benefit the owner of this tank? Explain.


2nd scenario

Another reefer has a 70 gallon tank which consist of 20 colonies of Caribbean polyps only. Which tank would benefit the most or at all from knowing their classification? One, both, or neither, why?


I have a part two which is my reply, once I hear what you guys/gals think. I'm just asking, no fights, no darts, no flames and no tricks. I'm just asking.


I still feel the cart's before the horse. I have wanted to say this for a long time but I just know someone would say that it is rude, so I'm not gonna say it. Instead, I will say this, you can create as many list as possible on any of the above topics discussed in this thread, if there are reefers who aren't versed on the basics of even owning a reef tank, none of those exhaustive list will do a single bit of good when his tank is crashing and his corals are dying. There are reefers who got into reefing on a whim and many basic reefing practices are not being implemented or adhered to. "WHAT YOU TALKIN BOUT WILLIS ???". I spoke to Rokie last week and revealed that I have secretly been working on revamping the "Zoanthid Information Draft" at the top of this page. I want to do this for those reefers who lack and seek what they need to be successful in reefing in this forum.

Question, which will have a direct and immediate impact on the very issues which many are experiencing in this forum daily, the classification list or the Zoanthid Information Database?


Organism hits the nail square on the head, this is my point in a nutshell. Since I hate names, I won't use one, but there are 3 distinct polyps which I have heard reefers say for years that no one can keep them alive and they always crash. Organism says it best, salinity alone can cause problems and still many never check it, horrible parameters can be a killer, dropping polyps in a tank that have been shipped cross country in cold water at 50 degrees without heat packs in the dead of winter to Michigan, and placed directly into a tank whose temp is 79 degrees, is a killer. How many of those reefers who lost their polyps ever took the time to find out what the other reefers who lost them did right or wrong? How many even know to check? I know a guy who lost those bright yellow and black polyps everyone wanted last year. I stopped by his house and ask about his test kits, he replied, he didn't own any. He spent hundreds of dollars on a few polyps, and he didn't own a single test kit. He used a salt which I would never suggest using and he had a tank full of surgeons. He placed the cart, which was the purchase of those expensive polyps, before the horse, basic captive care for any corals.

Most polyp issues are due to stress, neglect and a lack of knowledge, not because they are neglectful reefers, many just don’t know. Also, improper parameters, a lack of basic husbandry skill sets and persistent moving and fragging. I use to order on line from a lot of stores prior to 2005/2006 when names were created and prices rose. Half of the time my polyps arrived dead, dying, with fungus/infections, water temps which dropped below 50 degrees due to no heat packs or those which did not activate. Some were so slimmed I had to nurse them back to health. Shipping and especially improper shipping can and will be stressful and sometimes to the point of causing mortality. Corals are not cut from the reef on Monday and arrived to a LFS on Tuesday. Someone correct me if the collection/expediting process has changed in recent years. If the focus was a shift from all that's been discussed, to some basic reefing 101 list and databases being created and discussed, I think you'd see a lot more support for this venture.


Not looking for a fight, let’s just continue to discuss this, no matter how redundant, no matter how long and often this issue arises.

While typing this, I just took a quick look at DEEC77's post a few minutes ago, as a result, I just deleted an entire paragraph as she is saying exactly what I wanted to say. + 100 DEEC77 as I agree with all you've stated. 80% to 90% of what's needed to know about keeping polyps can be found with a search in this forum, a search on Google or just participating in these discussion. The 5 topics I continue to mention over and over again will not do a single thing to keep your polyps happy, healthy or even a live.

Kichimark, that kid has most likely turned his back on reefing forever and will probably discourage others from pursuing this hobby as well.


Zoas are going to tolerate and/or prefer 2 types of internal current, med and high. But what's medium, and what's high? Larger disc polyps with longer shirts can tolerate higher flow. Small disc polyps with short nubby skirts can't tolerate the same high flow. But MUCHO, what is high flow vs medium flow. Random current which doesn't cause retraction in either polyp, 100 % each and every single time tells you what med and high flow is. I have grown zoas like this to the point they grew out of my tank. I know some reefers who have grown the most stunning array of diverse polyps that you can imagine, some OG's and some newbies. None have ever purchased a flow meter, none have ever not understood what either flow is. I have shared this with reefers for 15 years, random current which slightly wiggles/moves the polyps without blowing the long skirt over the oral disc to the point of causing retraction, conversely, smaller polyps with shorter skirts would tolerate less. That is it in a nutshell. Yes, it's just that simple.

In closing, no one can stop anyone from creating anything here as long as it doesn't violate RC's rules and regs. So I think someone show just go ahead and do it. Again, in the interim, I still wish we could get just as much energy, time and attention paid to all the questions which need attention, as oppose to the overwhelming attention to pictures, videos, ID's and names. That's all I'm asking. Knowing if it is a Sociatus or a hippopotamus means nothing if basic reefing practices are not implemented on a daily basis, a daily basis. Again, the knowledge is great, I’m all for it, but why not the same vigor with the meat of this forum? I yield the floor. :D


Mucho Reef
 
Last edited:
I think if we did this it needs to be species based and general guidlines about certain species. We can have pictures of named zoas and wild ones but I don't think it should be a morph guide and I think there should be no names ( like blue hornets, ect) under pictures. Just picture representations of the different species. If we do this there needs to also be wild habitat info like how deep a species grows etc so we can work on replicating it in the aquarium.

I don't think you all realize how difficult a species guide is going to be. Some zoas we don't even know what the exact species are and many are likely misnamed as a certain species when it is really another. If anyone has access to the zoa article from last year in Coral Magazine, the author goes on to say that there are certain species that we dont even know what they are. Who's to say just because it has a green mouth means that all zoas with green mouths are the same species? To be accurate, many of these zoanthids need to be DNA typed.
 
I keep thinking about it and a species or origin guide is really not going to help much, a troubleshooting guide would be much better. The main thing that makes zoanthids have issues isn't certain species needing certain conditions, it's them coming into the tank with some kind of problem.

It could be one of the many fungii, pests, salinity in the new tank, etc... All new zoanthids should start off the same anywas: moderately high flow, low light. After that we don't need people looking at the color or origin to find the problem since it's just going to slow them down, we need them troubleshooting what it might be by seeing if the polyp has brown stems, a funky smell, etc... Besides, the vast majority of zoanthid issues I've seen are "I put them right under my halide since the color was bright" or "I put them in low flow so they can adjust".
 
I keep thinking about it and a species or origin guide is really not going to help much, a troubleshooting guide would be much better. The main thing that makes zoanthids have issues isn't certain species needing certain conditions, it's them coming into the tank with some kind of problem.

It could be one of the many fungii, pests, salinity in the new tank, etc... All new zoanthids should start off the same anywas: moderately high flow, low light. After that we don't need people looking at the color or origin to find the problem since it's just going to slow them down, we need them troubleshooting what it might be by seeing if the polyp has brown stems, a funky smell, etc... Besides, the vast majority of zoanthid issues I've seen are "I put them right under my halide since the color was bright" or "I put them in low flow so they can adjust".

The only problem I see is that troubleshooting is dependent on the person's tank. I think you're right on though about not needing a color or morph guide and educating people more about care. The only reason I suggested a species guide is that species may come from different conditions and in order to keep our zoas happy, we need to replicate that wild habitat. Me, I just troubleshoot like you said, if it's irriated what do I do? Look for pests, move it into different light, and move it into different flow. There's not too much that we could write about a troubleshooting guide. I think a lot of hassle would be saved if people just did their own research and questioning vs. having someone else do it for them in a list.
 
If a reefer, newbie or oldbie :D, it doesn't matter, has a 70 gallon reef tank, with 20 colonies or frags of zoas and palys and 50% of the rest of his tank was softies, and those 20 zoa colonies were 5 from the Caribbean, 5 are Indo, 5 from Australia and 5 from Figi and one colony of let's say....the Africans that Organism mentioned. My question is this, how will knowing their classification benefit the owner of this tank? Explain.


2nd scenario

Another reefer has a 70 gallon tank which consist of 20 colonies of Caribbean polyps only. Which tank would benefit the most or at all from knowing their classification? One, both, or neither, why?


Anyone ??
 
Anyone ??

First scenrio no. You can't replicate 4 different needs and still have a stable system.

Second perhaps since they are all from the same location but your system still needs to be stable


I have my granddaughter again so answers will have be short and sweet:p

~Dee~
 
Second tank because you couldn't replicate all of those environments in one tank. I see what you are getting at though even with a species guide for helping. It's kind of pointless.
 
Clarification

I don't see rhetoric. It's not rhetoric when the same questions are asked and discussed and answered in this forum everyday? It's not rhetoric when people come here and post their issues without posting the background needed for us to answer those questions. It's not rhetoric when the same type of threads, discussions and opinions show up day after day, week after week and month after month. It's the nature of the beast, or should I say, of public forums. I think we exacerbate these issues with the labels and adjectives we use, which have been used by others in this thread, which only serve to fan the flames of discourse. I keep hearing, "oh no, not this topic again", or, "here we go again", when everything posted in this forum and on the net is "here we go again". That's just the way it is and no one is going to agree with everything written here. Often when I see something which I don't like to see, tired of seeing or reading, don't agree with or choose not to involve myself in, I just look away and won't reply to it. I will never tell anyone they can't talk about it and I'm not saying you did, but others have.

Indeed, nor am I saying that you did my friend.

1st scenario

If a reefer, newbie or oldbie :D, it doesn't matter, has a 70 gallon reef tank, with 20 colonies or frags of zoas and palys and 50% of the rest of his tank was softies, and those 20 zoa colonies were 5 from the Caribbean, 5 are Indo, 5 from Australia and 5 from Figi and one colony of let's say....the Africans that Organism mentioned. My question is this, how will knowing their classification benefit the owner of this tank? Explain.


2nd scenario

Another reefer has a 70 gallon tank which consist of 20 colonies of Caribbean polyps only. Which tank would benefit the most or at all from knowing their classification? One, both, or neither, why?

Obviously neither will benefit from knowing their classification. However, if individual #1 where to come onto the forum, describe his polyps, explain they are all being kept under the same conditions, and ask why some are not thriving, would that not help us in being able to help him?

Additionally, I personally would enjoy knowing the origin/classification of my polyps - not because I'm looking to sell them for extraordinarily high prices, but simply because as a biologist it is something that I enjoy knowing. Does everything here in the zoanthid forum have to only be for the benefit of the newbies who are having problems? Is it bad if we, more experienced hobbiests wish to take our reef-keeping to the next level? I guess for me personally, its similar to others who are interested in keeping fish - If I try to keep a colder water Atlantic wrasse with a warmer water Pacific wrasse are both going to thrive in my aquarium. Why not? The simply fact is that not all polyps come from the same water conditions, therefore, they are not all going to thrive under the same water conditions.

Question, which will have a direct and immediate impact on the very issues which many are experiencing in this forum daily, the classification list or the Zoanthid Information Database?


Organism hits the nail square on the head, this is my point in a nutshell. Since I hate names, I won't use one, but there are 3 distinct polyps which I have heard reefers say for years that no one can keep them alive and they always crash. Organism says it best, salinity alone can cause problems and still many never check it, horrible parameters can be a killer, dropping polyps in a tank that have been shipped cross country in cold water at 50 degrees without heat packs in the dead of winter to Michigan, and placed directly into a tank whose temp is 79 degrees, is a killer. How many of those reefers who lost their polyps ever took the time to find out what the other reefers who lost them did right or wrong? How many even know to check? I know a guy who lost those bright yellow and black polyps everyone wanted last year. I stopped by his house and ask about his test kits, he replied, he didn't own any. He spent hundreds of dollars on a few polyps, and he didn't own a single test kit. He used a salt which I would never suggest using and he had a tank full of surgeons. He placed the cart, which was the purchase of those expensive polyps, before the horse, basic captive care for any corals.
Mucho Reef

Who most frequently comes to this forum? Newbies with issues or a few old reefers day after day? If you want the forum to be active, we can't just focus on info for the newbies, we also have to focus on items of interest to us tired old reefers. Part of why I left another site is because I got tired of answer the same questions over and over again by newbies, and thats really all the site was about; I don't mind helping or answering a question once in awhile, but I want to expand my own knowledge base and share info/exchange ideas opening with other experienced reefers as well. Just my opinion.

I don't think you all realize how difficult a species guide is going to be. Some zoas we don't even know what the exact species are and many are likely misnamed as a certain species when it is really another. If anyone has access to the zoa article from last year in Coral Magazine, the author goes on to say that there are certain species that we dont even know what they are. Who's to say just because it has a green mouth means that all zoas with green mouths are the same species? To be accurate, many of these zoanthids need to be DNA typed.

Agreed species is almost impossible, origin would be far better.

I keep thinking about it and a species or origin guide is really not going to help much, a troubleshooting guide would be much better. The main thing that makes zoanthids have issues isn't certain species needing certain conditions, it's them coming into the tank with some kind of problem.

It could be one of the many fungii, pests, salinity in the new tank, etc... All new zoanthids should start off the same anywas: moderately high flow, low light. After that we don't need people looking at the color or origin to find the problem since it's just going to slow them down, we need them troubleshooting what it might be by seeing if the polyp has brown stems, a funky smell, etc... Besides, the vast majority of zoanthid issues I've seen are "I put them right under my halide since the color was bright" or "I put them in low flow so they can adjust".

I agree, but don't think one necessarily means you can't do the other.

I am very interested in a species or origin guide......

+1 :beer:
 
Dee and Mallorie, that's exactly my point. Unless you have an entire tank loaded with like regionally collected polyps, which I don't think anyone has, all of which might prefer a set of parameters, this list will not help solve the issues or answer the many questions here as it is being proclaimed. If someone has an entire tank loaded with polyps from the Caribbean, sure, it might have a direct impact. If not, you won't be able to have set zones within your system to accommodate the needs of polyps collected from multiple regions. I have always advocated finding a happy medium with documentation and minor adjustments until the happy medium is achieved when and where all your polyps are happy and thriving. My concern is that this list will give false hope to a lot of people and convince them that this list will be the cure all for whatever you are experiencing in your system. I just feel it should be portrayed as purely educational but not a cure as some have stated.

If this list is creative for simple educational purposes, then that's great, but it's misleading to say or think it will cure the ills of this forum and answer all or most of its questions.

Maybe someone should just volunteer and get started on the list.


Mucho
 
What if the list had an introduction date to the hobby?

I am interested in that as well as geographic locations etc.
 
Back
Top