A General Guide to Salt Mixes

One article of interest:


Chemical composition of the sclerotized black coral skeleton (Coelenterata: Antipatharia): a comparison of two species
http://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...a3e55387e14c80b1c7fef4972e4ae3f5&searchtype=a

Walter M. Goldberg, *, Theodore L. Hopkins" , Susan M. Holl"¡, Jacob Schaefer"¡, Karl J. Kramer§, Thomas D. Morgan"  and Kiho Kim|

"  Kansas State University, Department of Entomology, Manhattan, KS 66506, U.S.A.

* Florida International University, Department of Biological Sciences, University Park Campus, Miami, FL 33199, U.S.A.

§ Washington University, Department of Chemistry, St Louis, MO 63130, U.S.A.

Received 20 July 1993; accepted 17 September 1993. Available online 3 February 2003.

Abstract

The chemical composition of the skeletons of two black coral species, Antipathes fiordensis from New Zealand and A. salix from the Caribbean, was examined to compare elemental and protein composition, and the chitin content both between species and between colonial tip and base. Of all elements surveyed, iodine and bromine were dominant in the skeleton. In A. fiordensis these halogens constituted 2"“3% of the skeletal weight, with different proportions occurring in tip and base. In contrast, the halogen content of A. salix constituted about 5% of the skeletal weight and consisted primarily of iodine in both tip and base. The chitin content of A. salix skeleton was about twice that of A. fiordensis based on 13C NMR analysis, but the glucosamine content was more significantly different between tip to base of A. fiordensis than between species, and suggests that the chitin content of both is about 10"“15% of the skeletal weight. The protein content of the two species was similar, constituting about 50% of the skeletal weight and varying by as much as 10% between the branch tip and base. Tip-to-base protein differences varied inversely with the chitin content. The skeletal proteins were rich in histidine, which constituted ca 11"“14% of the amino acids. Both species also contained a tyrosine-rich fraction associated with chitin. The most distinctive difference between the skeletal proteins of the two species was the disparity in the levels and types of diphenol as shown by 13C NMR and chemical analyses. In A. fiordensis, the skeleton contained about four and 12 times as much hydrolyzable DOPA in tip and base, respectively, compared to A. salix. Small amounts of 3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde were also present in A. fiordensis skeleton, but none was found in A. salix.
 
For reference taken from an online encyclopedia:

"The halogens or halogen elements are a series of nonmetal elements from Group 17 IUPAC Style (formerly: VII, VIIA) of the periodic table, comprising fluorine (F), chlorine (Cl), bromine (Br), iodine (I), and astatine (At). The artificially created element 117, provisionally referred to by the systematic name ununseptium, may also be a halogen."
 
Interesting Cliff....
But - Black corals are non-photosynthetic, correct? So their processes in general may be very different than corals that are kept in well lit aquariums?
If that is true, then the demand for different elements for growth and health may be different as well.
T
 
Bromine in Scleractinian Coral Aragonite: X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AGUSM.B31A..09P

Pingitore, N. E.; Cruz-Jimenez, G.; Wellington, G. M.
American Geophysical Union, Spring Meeting 2002,

abstract #B31A-09

Initial examination of Br K-edge XANES (x-ray absorption near-edge structure) suggests that the bulk of the bromine in these corals is present in the form of sodium bromide. We examined 12 coral specimens, including the taxa Porites lobata, Porites lutea, Pavona clavus, and Pavona gigantea, all collected live in the Pacific from Galapagos, Rarotonga, Fiji, and Gulf of Panama, and Montastrea annularis, collected from the Pleistocene of Marie Galante, Guadeloupe, in the Caribbean. The spectra of seven specimens provided sufficient detail to attempt to match the absorption edge and the first few peaks to those of the sodium bromide reference standard. The identification can be considered positive in the best sample since the match included the full XANES region and the first oscillation in the EXAFS (extended x-ray absorption fine structure) region. The quality of the data on the other 6 samples was sufficient to show consistency with the NaBr reference standard. Superficial sea salts from marine water presumably were lost when the corals were rinsed in tap water subsequent to collection, and when they were slabbed on a diamond-bladed slow-speed saw, using deionized water as a lubricant and coolant. This suggests that the bromine is present as a salt at a more intimate level of the aragonite skeletal structure, perhaps at crystal boundaries or in association with organic matter. Data were collected at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory on beam line 4-3 in fluorescence mode, using a Lytle detector and a Se 6 filter. A sodium bromide foil was run behind the Lytle detector as an internal reference.
 
Thank you Cliff!
As usual - you are the answer guy. I will try to keep a steady supply of questions so as to prevent your being bored! :fun4:

( Should not be a problem for me :rollface: )

PS - Somewhere in my rapidly failing memory resides parts of a research paper that discussed even photosynthetic corals switching their preference from calcium to strontium - based on water temperature. Seems that the same tropical species of acroprora (?) in the test showed a preference for strontium as the temperature dropped down a few degrees....
Can you remember such article?
Thanks again-

T
 
Last edited:
I probably have enough organo-phosphate pesticides accumulated in my system over the years, where I need to have my synaptic responses tweaked occasionally. :lol:
 
Randy's company is in the process of a possible hostile take-over, which means he has to devote more time there unfortunately. :(

He has said he should be back, once things straighten out. ;)

Nice to see you back. :)
 
I am thinking about trying the Red Sea Coral pro in my sons 34 Max. I have been using Oceanic in my main tank for about 2 months now and so far I like it. High Calcium keeps me from having to dose.
 
Is there anyway to update the first page of the first post (in the original thread). A lot of people still reference this and it's a couple years old now. I recently found myself totally hosed when I bought a box of Red Sea Coral Pro looking for something with a Low DKH, and it turns out they recently changed the forumla... I was excepting 7-7.5dkh ended with 16!!! I know i'm no the only one the keeps referencing this thread, but at this point no information is better then mis-information.
 
So..... whats the best salt mix?

Opinions and requirements vary. Higher price doesn't equal higher quality . What's the best beer?
 
Back
Top