For what ever reason, I believe you knowingly and willfully posted misinformation and falsehoods on the worlds largest international web site directed to marine aquarium keepers regarding me personally as well as some of our accomplishments.
***Lets talk about the S-15 report and what is means and does not mean and get off the bother-in-law click. Is that your only reason for not answering questions ? The bother in-law click is all you may have on me. Give me that list with all my posted misinformation and falsehoods without gibberish and I will answer them.
You did not. In fact, you continue to post the same things over and over. As well as taking things out of context and/or put your own spin on what was clearly posted.
***Well that is because you never answer the questions asked. Read my post and answer all questions or leave and move on. Personnel attack, well you keep talking about how all others are taking gibberish but you are not. Apparently you are or think you are the only one that knows anything about salt mixes. I see and I'm sure most see it as you are the spinner, not me.
1) Please enlighten me as well as other RC'ers how 14 pounds of marine salts can hydrate the same amount of working solution (same salinity and same temperature) as 15 pounds of the same balanced marine salt chemistry?
***Balance is in the mind of the beholder
It is enlightening to discover which brands of salts have declined in integrity as well as lowered their net weight. E.g. 15 pounds of balanced marine salt chemistry is required to hydrate 50 US gallons of working solution at a SG of 1.024-1.025
When Boomer satisfies the answers to how 14 & 15 pound packages of like chemistry's ability to produce the same salinity at the same temperature (all in the name of reef aquarium chemistry), can the many other statements he has made be addressed.
***More of your spin where is it stated 14 lbs vs 15 lbs.
I said
That means nothing and nonsense . Just because some salt hydrates to 1.024 -1.025 ****means nothing in regards to its components****. Having a salt mix solution at 35 g /Kg = 1.024 or even 1.026 says nothing
Let the data speak for its self.
Now you are discrediting Dr. Hovanec and Inland. All salt studies are bad accept yours. Nobody else knows what they are doing. Do you have any proof about these studies being misleading/wrong/ errored other than just talk ? And who are you to judge them but we should not judge you. Looks like a double std to me.
These salt studies pretty much prove my point
Feature Article: Inland Reef Aquaria Salt Study, Part I
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2005/11/aafeature1
Feature Article: Inland Reef Aquaria Salt Study Part II
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2005/12/aafeature1
A Chemical Analysis of Select Trace Elements in Synthetic Sea Salts and Natural Seawater
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/issues/sept2004/feature.htm
2) Provide any type of proof that I ever had or currently have a brother-in-law working in any capacity at Anresco Lab.
***Maybe it was not you brother in-law but some one else. Sorry, maybe this is an error but was what I was told. And in the past you have never answered the question. Are you happy now ?
You must support this statement before we (RC) can move on with the many other falsehoods you posted.
***More excuses, you always have one. I don 't have to prove anything. Besides you have proved nothing just talk, so you are no different than I.
User agreement, you always have an excuse of not reading the user agreement, after the fact. So don 't give me that crap. It is why you have been warned here by Bill. And why you were almost booted off RAG, and will if you ever enter RS or RF would be banned.
If you cannot provide documents or evidence to this claim, it can be simply regarded as one more of your posts without base and with malice. Therefore, it is highly possible a great number of other things you post on this and other threads (as well as other web sites) cannot be believed.
***It is your opinion vs my opinion and you can not do much about that. You are posting gibberish and doing the same as usually, refusing to answer the questions at hand as usually. Your excuses will be me asking the questions so you will not post answers as usually.
Don't be giving me that malice crap.
I believe you knowingly and willfully posted misinformation and falsehoods on the worlds largest international web site directed to marine aquarium keepers regarding me personally as well as some of our accomplishments
***That is nonsense and quite trying to make yourself, as usually, as the good guy that got beat up..............poor me
1. Where is a list of GSP people ?
2. Where is a signed /dated document from Anresco Lab. Looks like a claim to me IMHO.
3. Where is an signed document form Environmental Trace Substances Research Center. Sounds like a claim IMHO.
4. You raised clown is artificial seawater before Martin Moe, where is the proof. It is claim IMHO.
5. Where is proof from the Dr. Hovanec study
5. Where is the proof from and Inland
You ask me to provide documents where are yours ? All you do is make claims
Read and answer the question on the my past start
Oh, I forgot something
How are you going to ignore your own facts on your own website.
Boomer to support his many statements that I know to be false.
You have not supplied any/documents so what is your excuse
It is just you talking. What is good enough for the goose is good enough fro the gander.......correct.
Finally, I have never personnel attacked you. I disagree with your statements harshly, my right and think you talk gibberish. I can be just as arrogant as you. That is my opinion and there is nothing you can do about it. And if you feel the same about , which your posts show I could care less. You are no different.
