Hello,
regarding T5-bulbs:
I guess it is no secret that KZ and ATI bulbs are coming from the same manufacture and production line (could often read this here) . So there is no big difference in Quality.
But our Blue plus is a modified version of the "standard" blue (BAM Blue) that is normally used in blue fluorescent tubes. We made this smal modification appr. 5 year ago.
The main difference is that our blue plus has a maximumin @453nm. A normal blue bulb has a maximum at 450 nm. So there is just a smal difference of 3nm in wavelenght. But we had good reasons to do this. The reasons are more biologically.
If you look at the Absorptionsspectrum of the symbiotic algae (Zooxanthella in vivo) you know which light is the most (photosynthetic) useful light for corals.
The graph shows the Absorbtionsspectrum of the Chlorophyll-Peridinin-Chlorophyll (PCP) that can be found in the Zooxanthella in vivo.
There is a maxima at 435nm (coming from Chlorophyll) and 475nm (coming from Peridinin). The interesting thing is that the maxima at 470nm is higher (most useful light) than the maxima @ 435nm.
But what does this mean for us ?
It simply means that a light source with a wavelenght of 470nm has the most photosynthtic useful light for corals. Of course, a light source with a maxiam at 450nm is very useful, too. but if you look at the absorbtionsspectrum in the graph) you can see that the range of 455-470nm is a little bit better. This is the reason why we decided to modify our Blue plus to this side (453nm instead of 450). We did this in order to give our corals just a little bit more useful light. It is not a big difference, but there defently is a smal difference.
We are designing T5-tubes for corals for more than 14 years now, and we have good reasons why we do what we do. I just want to jump in here to explain this a little bit and I hope you understand what I want to say.
We are doing light for corals. Not just for the human eye... please keep this in mind....
regards,
Oliver
regarding T5-bulbs:
I guess it is no secret that KZ and ATI bulbs are coming from the same manufacture and production line (could often read this here) . So there is no big difference in Quality.
But our Blue plus is a modified version of the "standard" blue (BAM Blue) that is normally used in blue fluorescent tubes. We made this smal modification appr. 5 year ago.
The main difference is that our blue plus has a maximumin @453nm. A normal blue bulb has a maximum at 450 nm. So there is just a smal difference of 3nm in wavelenght. But we had good reasons to do this. The reasons are more biologically.
If you look at the Absorptionsspectrum of the symbiotic algae (Zooxanthella in vivo) you know which light is the most (photosynthetic) useful light for corals.
The graph shows the Absorbtionsspectrum of the Chlorophyll-Peridinin-Chlorophyll (PCP) that can be found in the Zooxanthella in vivo.

There is a maxima at 435nm (coming from Chlorophyll) and 475nm (coming from Peridinin). The interesting thing is that the maxima at 470nm is higher (most useful light) than the maxima @ 435nm.
But what does this mean for us ?
It simply means that a light source with a wavelenght of 470nm has the most photosynthtic useful light for corals. Of course, a light source with a maxiam at 450nm is very useful, too. but if you look at the absorbtionsspectrum in the graph) you can see that the range of 455-470nm is a little bit better. This is the reason why we decided to modify our Blue plus to this side (453nm instead of 450). We did this in order to give our corals just a little bit more useful light. It is not a big difference, but there defently is a smal difference.
We are designing T5-tubes for corals for more than 14 years now, and we have good reasons why we do what we do. I just want to jump in here to explain this a little bit and I hope you understand what I want to say.
We are doing light for corals. Not just for the human eye... please keep this in mind....
regards,
Oliver