Batch of bad salt, foreign objects in salt -- 1.026 = 5.8 dKH
- Thread starter Rakie
- Start date
GoVols
Cobb Webb - 1989
Thank You!
I can see the charts but what does that have to do with buckets not matching the QC sheets?
I'm guessing AF salt looks good in these charts but how could TM Pro Reef be missing?
Thanks, GoVols
I am the author of the article, and I would like to bring your attention to the fact that you have no copyrights for publishing this translation without my permission.
Full translation of the document will be available in the next couple of days.
Please remove it immediately.
Regards,
Bart Stanczyk
Full translation of the document will be available in the next couple of days.
Please remove it immediately.
Regards,
Bart Stanczyk
120reefer
New member
Potatohead
New member
lol
120reefer
New member
For future reference I will remove it but I really have no duty to do so.
http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/faqs/copyright-protection/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/faqs/copyright-protection/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Potatohead
New member
Better put Google on your hit list 
GoVols
Cobb Webb - 1989
Why is Tropic Marin Pro Reef not in your testing?
GoVols
Cobb Webb - 1989
120reefer,
Can you start a new thread when it's in English?
I don't see any connection with this study to the issues on this thread.
Regards, GoVols
120reefer
New member
Here is the promised link .
https://reefhub.pl/test-of-marine-salts-which-one-is-the-best/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://reefhub.pl/test-of-marine-salts-which-one-is-the-best/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
plyle02
Active member
Hey Freddie,
Aquaforest will now include batch tests online instead of a QC slip in each bucket. This is in effort to move towards what the industry on a whole is doing. I think Debora was trying to indicate that the tests in these results were due to the salinity being 35ppt as opposed to 33ppt where the QC was indicated on this batch. Hopefully this will make things a bit easier on hobbyists. I am fairly certain that a batch out there was over fortified with minerals, this was several months back, I am not certain, as I do not have access to the equipment or manufacturing.
Cheers my friend!
Aquaforest will now include batch tests online instead of a QC slip in each bucket. This is in effort to move towards what the industry on a whole is doing. I think Debora was trying to indicate that the tests in these results were due to the salinity being 35ppt as opposed to 33ppt where the QC was indicated on this batch. Hopefully this will make things a bit easier on hobbyists. I am fairly certain that a batch out there was over fortified with minerals, this was several months back, I am not certain, as I do not have access to the equipment or manufacturing.
Cheers my friend!
Last edited:
GoVols
Cobb Webb - 1989
Moderator,
Please delete my last post #95 as I asked you in my PM.
Hi Perry,
I'm just done with the whole thing. We can argue until the end of time but I'm done.
We can all look a year from now and see if it's truly been fixed.
We are friends and I hope your new job is going well. Have you started your office build yet?
Regards, Freddie
Is this becoming a salinity argument now?
1) If my nutrients are high its better not to use AF Probiotic right? So one must not mix Reefsalt to 35ppt ?
2) If i use Probiotic & want to hit hard on some water changes because of issues once again its not a good thing to do that with Probiotic so you need to use Reefsalt BUT once again don't use 35ppt ?.
I DO NOT WANT MY TANK AT 1500 Mg
Note the test below done Oct 2016 by AF's own ICP @ 33.5ppt & its still 1514 mg
The same table is here
http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showpost.php?p=24924613&postcount=179
(you need to scroll down a bit)
This is not just a US thing - there's post's in a UK forum about it as well with people ditching AF because of AF's lack of openness about the issue.
Anyway i was happily sorted out by AF but i'm not hooking into water changes to have my tank end up at 1500 Mg so i've walked to another brand.
AF Rep's this ain't your beef,you guys do a great job,it's the people above that are still printing b/s QC card's that need to sort their end out.
My Reefsalt QC card said 34ppt & Mg 1300......
My Mg was 1550 @ 35ppt
1) If my nutrients are high its better not to use AF Probiotic right? So one must not mix Reefsalt to 35ppt ?
2) If i use Probiotic & want to hit hard on some water changes because of issues once again its not a good thing to do that with Probiotic so you need to use Reefsalt BUT once again don't use 35ppt ?.
I DO NOT WANT MY TANK AT 1500 Mg
Note the test below done Oct 2016 by AF's own ICP @ 33.5ppt & its still 1514 mg
The same table is here
http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showpost.php?p=24924613&postcount=179
(you need to scroll down a bit)
This is not just a US thing - there's post's in a UK forum about it as well with people ditching AF because of AF's lack of openness about the issue.
Anyway i was happily sorted out by AF but i'm not hooking into water changes to have my tank end up at 1500 Mg so i've walked to another brand.
AF Rep's this ain't your beef,you guys do a great job,it's the people above that are still printing b/s QC card's that need to sort their end out.
My Reefsalt QC card said 34ppt & Mg 1300......
My Mg was 1550 @ 35ppt
plyle02
Active member
Freddie,
I apologize regarding the Aquaforest products and not getting the consistency and results, but yes, at the end of the day we are all reefing buddies, despite our differences. I have the office build going, it is looking great, but used fresh air rock from fiji, and it is stinking up the whole place, lol...
Cheers
If you want a post removed, you need to report the relevant post. A moderator may not have the time to search for the post in question.
