Peter
I also think it is important to bring up the issue of the way you accomplish flow in your tank. I have always totally discounted the flow produced by the return pump in terms of the amount of turnover in a large reef tank for 2 reasons:
1. The flow from a return pump is entirely uni-directional.
Uni-directional flow is not typical flow pattern found on a reef in the wild and tends to work towards blowing the particulate food matter past corals rather than swirling the food around the coral.
Also, part of the benefit of erratic flow in a reef tank is that the coral (meaning the zooxanthellae within the coral) do respire and thus a layer of CO2 (normally a few microns thick) tends to envelop the coral structure itself. Uni-directional flow removes CO2 from only one portion of the coral structure while erratic flow encompasses the entire coral's structure, thus ensuring proper respiration.
2. Bigger is not necessarily better when it comes to flow from your main pump.
Presumably the function of your main circulation pump is bring water out of your DT to be filtered by your skimmer, refugium, RDSB, etc. In several of these filtration sources (refugium, RDSB, crypic zone, and whatnot) a very slow flow is desired for full effectiveness. Also, you skimmer has a maximum effective flow rate (for the purposes of this explanation let's say 1000 gph). If you skimmer can only process 1000 gph, blowing two or three times that through the sump accomplishes water movement in the DT but does not effectuate efficient filtration via skimming.
Why pay more to purchase and run a bigger pump (and add more heat to the water) if increased flow results in a more laminar water pattern and is no more effective in terms of filtration?