More nonsense and twisting.Don't put words in my mouth .
Please, you know that ammonia is not good for fish. Why would you want to take up a position that claims a bit of ammonia is not very bad? The fact is that it can be very bad and the impact may not show months later.
Of course it's harmful even at low levels,maybe as low as 0.1pmm, to repeat less than <0.1ppm levels are recommended; test kits don't show below .25 , so undetectable ammonia is the goal with them.
Ammonia is part of the nitrogen cycle . No fixed nitrogen equals no protein. peptides, dna ;and, no life.
Your claim that you never expose your fish to any ammonia is nonsense and shows a lack of understanding of fundamental facts. Fish and other organisms are always exposed to small amounts and produce it as waste to expel excess nitrogen the take in form foods.
The purpose of the UV is to vastly reduce the waterborne concentration of pathogenic bacteria and viruses.
Those small microorganisms that pass through an appropiately sized uv will perish including benificial organisms Those that don't pass through will grow faster to match the available food supply.
The UV destroys many drugs, so it is more preventive than cure.
Uh huh. Uv is contraindicated with copper medications like Cupramine btw. So,exactly why do you use it and copper together?
Ever since I started using the UV about 25 years ago, the incidents of bacterial infection has dropped by about 80%.
What kinds of bacterial infections? Do you have any specifics ? Ever since I put my uvs on the shelf about 6 years ago my tanks are thriving and I've not had a bacterial; infection in the 40 fish in them.I rarely see them in new qt'd fish but treat them appropriately with antibiotics when I do.
I would agree that a beginner should not be told too mch, more than he can digest.
That's condescending and evidently true of folks with more time in the hobby who refuse to learn and misdirect others ;maybe more so in some cases.
Please, you know that ammonia is not good for fish. Why would you want to take up a position that claims a bit of ammonia is not very bad? The fact is that it can be very bad and the impact may not show months later.
Of course it's harmful even at low levels,maybe as low as 0.1pmm, to repeat less than <0.1ppm levels are recommended; test kits don't show below .25 , so undetectable ammonia is the goal with them.
Ammonia is part of the nitrogen cycle . No fixed nitrogen equals no protein. peptides, dna ;and, no life.
Your claim that you never expose your fish to any ammonia is nonsense and shows a lack of understanding of fundamental facts. Fish and other organisms are always exposed to small amounts and produce it as waste to expel excess nitrogen the take in form foods.
The purpose of the UV is to vastly reduce the waterborne concentration of pathogenic bacteria and viruses.
Those small microorganisms that pass through an appropiately sized uv will perish including benificial organisms Those that don't pass through will grow faster to match the available food supply.
The UV destroys many drugs, so it is more preventive than cure.
Uh huh. Uv is contraindicated with copper medications like Cupramine btw. So,exactly why do you use it and copper together?
Ever since I started using the UV about 25 years ago, the incidents of bacterial infection has dropped by about 80%.
What kinds of bacterial infections? Do you have any specifics ? Ever since I put my uvs on the shelf about 6 years ago my tanks are thriving and I've not had a bacterial; infection in the 40 fish in them.I rarely see them in new qt'd fish but treat them appropriately with antibiotics when I do.
I would agree that a beginner should not be told too mch, more than he can digest.
That's condescending and evidently true of folks with more time in the hobby who refuse to learn and misdirect others ;maybe more so in some cases.