gone by 2050?

[greenbean36191]

Guys, just a friendly reminder- The UA prohibits political and religious discussion.

Whether you feel it's relevant or not, please leave politics and religion out of the discussion. Otherwise this thread will come to a very quick halt and this is an important topic to discuss.

 

[vitz]

i'm curious as to how this topic can be discussed without references to political/energy use/development policies that directly effect gobal warming and reefs ? It's largely in part to those very politics/policies that the issue exists still today altogether :/

it's kind of like saying you can't discuss the still ongoing use of cyanide without discussing phillipine politics- knowledge of one is required to factually/correctly understand the other

i understand that it's not allowed/frowned upon-but it really makes all discussion here exceedingly shallow/fairly irrelevant, and really makes it impossible to discuss completely/factually/properly

jmo

 

[buck50bmg]

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14290350#post14290350 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by vitz
climate change isn't 'going to happen'-it started as soon as the industrial revolution began

when it happens full blast-the planet will recover, eventually.WE won't

the scientific community on the whole has severely under-estimated the rate of glacial melting across the board, and has missed the mark repeatedly-the scientific community should be storming the houses of gov'ts around the globe, instead of letting oil profiteer puppets like the idjit last prez, try to trash the progress of science and plain ol' simple listening to the actual facts (bush did more to ruin the environment and try and suppress science/scientific knowledge than any other past prez)

100 sump bux sez that anyone born within the past decade will see the total end of reefs, and many other species (food) of fish, like tuna

the rate of decline is not linear

once certain feedback loops begin, they CANNOT be stopped by anyone, in spite of our naive foolish beliefs that people or scientists can correct everything

the general masses of this planet truly have no clue as to what the extent of environmental damage has been done to this planet, or what the large scale results will be-in fact, as is sooooo typical of our species, not only do we interfere and meddle with very dangerous practices/policies on a PLANETARY scale, our best ideas is to try and mess with them even more, instead of simply stopping the damage we're doing

there's absolutely NO reason why this country, and every other developing country (china and india, for example), shouldn't have completely eliminated the use of ALL fossil fuels for anything, decades ago.

have fun driving your suv's, and burning fossil fuels to keep a pretty tank in your house ! at least the cats at exxon will be happy and fat going to hell in the handbasket they're making

bottom line is, even if we completely stop ALL pollution YESTERDAY, it's too late-the wheels have been set in motion-enjoy the ride !

Take a look at this....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIq8eWpMQH4&feature=related

So funny

 

[billsreef]

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14299497#post14299497 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by buck50bmg
Take a look at this....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIq8eWpMQH4&feature=related

So funny

And completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand

 

[buck50bmg]

But still funny.....

 

[DgenR8]

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14298258#post14298258 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by vitz
i'm curious as to how this topic can be discussed without references to political/energy use/development policies that directly effect gobal warming and reefs ? It's largely in part to those very politics/policies that the issue exists still today altogether :/

You've made it quite obvious that if it can be discussed without political reference, you're not capable of discussing it that way. Seeing as I had just edited a post for political content, and warned against it, perhaps your best move would have been to just keep on going to a discussion that you could participate in without breaking our rules.
That's all water under the bridge, now.
Thread closed