algaeguy
Over-The-Top- Reef Geek
jnowell:
Thanks for sharing your experience!
As Paul has mentioned, if detritus in and of itself was a huge detriment to water quality, it seems as though we'd see a lot more in the way of disasters with rubble bottom and rubble-zone-incorporating systems. And the "low-flow-rubble-bottom" seems like a neat idea, too. I don't think that super flow is an absolute requirement for this kind of system. I think that the fact that you can run insanely high flow rates without substrate blowing all over is just another feature of the concept, but certainly not a "rule"...No rules here- just ideas!
The fact that detritus appears in most every system over time makes me wonder about the perceived advantages of "cooking" rock. I'm not trying to provoke those who sucessfully employ this method, but I'm starting to be skeptical about any long-term benefit of this process. I don't think that there is anything wron with the concept, but it seems that our thoughts are in direct opposition to the idea, and systems seem to be working in both the long and short term.
If detritus can actually benefit a system in some way, I'd be hesitant to employ such a "sterilization" technique before using the rock in a rubble-based system. I suppose just the standard "curing" process would do. Once again, I'm not advocating neglect or lack of good husbandry, but I am advocating that fanatic cleanliness may not be essential; in fact- may be detrimental to a sucessful rubble system. Skimming, water changes, activated carbon, etc. all have their places. One thing that we do get from our bare bottom friends is an appreciation for sound maintenance, but the similarities seem to start diverging from there.
Anyways- keep throwing the ideas out there!
Scott
Thanks for sharing your experience!
As Paul has mentioned, if detritus in and of itself was a huge detriment to water quality, it seems as though we'd see a lot more in the way of disasters with rubble bottom and rubble-zone-incorporating systems. And the "low-flow-rubble-bottom" seems like a neat idea, too. I don't think that super flow is an absolute requirement for this kind of system. I think that the fact that you can run insanely high flow rates without substrate blowing all over is just another feature of the concept, but certainly not a "rule"...No rules here- just ideas!
The fact that detritus appears in most every system over time makes me wonder about the perceived advantages of "cooking" rock. I'm not trying to provoke those who sucessfully employ this method, but I'm starting to be skeptical about any long-term benefit of this process. I don't think that there is anything wron with the concept, but it seems that our thoughts are in direct opposition to the idea, and systems seem to be working in both the long and short term.
If detritus can actually benefit a system in some way, I'd be hesitant to employ such a "sterilization" technique before using the rock in a rubble-based system. I suppose just the standard "curing" process would do. Once again, I'm not advocating neglect or lack of good husbandry, but I am advocating that fanatic cleanliness may not be essential; in fact- may be detrimental to a sucessful rubble system. Skimming, water changes, activated carbon, etc. all have their places. One thing that we do get from our bare bottom friends is an appreciation for sound maintenance, but the similarities seem to start diverging from there.
Anyways- keep throwing the ideas out there!
Scott