chrissreef
New member
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=11725035#post11725035 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by zemuron114
Most people who support the Bill have never been diving in Hawaii (i'm generalizing as im sure some have) Potters angels are abundant. 70 feet down on a reef slope there are hundreds (and that is just one spot) Flame angels in Hawaii are more rare then bandit angels...
Also, those who support should just shut down their aquariums now. How can you support a Bill that shuts down Hawaii (one of the few places who actually collect fish correctly without the use of drugs or explosives) when you currently keep an aquarium - when i bet you have a Hawaiian/marshalls/xmas fish in it (or inverts). the repercussions of this bill will effect EVERYONE in the industry. Your favorite LFS will go out of business because BOTH the aquarium staples (yellows and flames) will slowly cease to exist in the industry and become a 400-500 dollar fish retail. Fiji, Vanuatu, Solomans, etc dont supply nearly enough flame angels as Christmas island alone.
I hope some type of regulation is in place (i dont like how many yellows are collected in Kona) but definitely not this bill!
- Quick! bangaii cardinals are red listed on the endangered species list - any ban on them would spell doom to islanders so we MUST keep harvesting. These people can't survive without them!
- My LFS will go out of business if they stop selling yellow tangs/flame angels? those are the only two fish that keep this hobby affloat!
- Abundant 70 feet down? They used to be abundant at 15 feet down - where are those angels now? This makes as much sense as "rain forests are abundant in certain areas of the world!" - but is short sighted... where were they 50 yrs ago? Should we continue to harvest until they're only only small pockets left (i.e. like now)