<sigh> I would think that on a board whose purpose it is to share thoughts, information, etc., about the hobby, and whose members, one would think, are dedicated to the hobby, that this discussion would not even need to take place. What does it matter if you can possess an endangered or protected species through a bunch of legal red tape? Why would you want to contribute to the private possession of such an organism? Cetainly most hobbyists do not have the facilities (or legal documentation) to attempt propagation for release/repopulation of wild colonies, right? When a species is placed on a CITES list, or when laws governing its collection, etc. on a local level exist, can you not respect that? Would you not say that only those specimens that should be taken are those intended for research? And only those that are possessed in captivity should be for research and/or reintroduction purposes? Do you not want to help save that species? Or is it better, in your opinion, to possess it? To "own" a specimen of a living being whose species is in peril?
I used to see this all of the time when I was into Herps, people looking for illegal reptile or amphibian species. I could not fathom why they would want to possibly contribute to the species destruction then, and I can not now.