Learning/rebuilding from my epic fail

ATM I don't have something to say about your tank bud...until the next batch of pics of course:):)

I have a question about your mh's though. Do you think that 150w would be sufficient for a 30inch deep(or even a bit deeper) tank? I'm happy with them in a 22inch deep but I'm a bit unsure if they will give me the same results in a 30+.
 
ATM I don't have something to say about your tank bud...until the next batch of pics of course:):)

I have a question about your mh's though. Do you think that 150w would be sufficient for a 30inch deep(or even a bit deeper) tank? I'm happy with them in a 22inch deep but I'm a bit unsure if they will give me the same results in a 30+.

Ok Mike, some pics to follow. ;)
That's a good question about the mh.. I think that 150w over a 30 inch deep tank would be pushing it a bit.. if I had 30 inches, I would go 250w de.
 
Ok.. little update on the never ending nutrient rollercoaster that is my reef..
I have reduce the photo period in my fuge by a couple more hours so that n will not be pulled down so much but I've continued dosing kno3.
I've gotten n back to around 10ppm..
The lanthanum chloride dosing has definitely produced results.
When I started, the Hanna phosphate test was giving me .24ppm. After a week it was .22 and a week later, .17. I felt that was a bit too rapid a reduction so the past week, I reduced it a bit. Today's tests using the phosphate test as well as a new ulr phosphorus test gave me .17 and .15 respectively.
I will continue at half the LC dose for another week and see where p is next weekend.
So far I am liking LC dosing. It is very controlled. And manipulating the photoperiod on the fuge is also very controlled......... so far.....

Ok.. some pics.. more macros from a few days ago..
Here's a grouping..
4c32e2cdf769f994538e8264b3200e70.jpg

1b99073dbf2866389d4dd276cd33a08d.jpg
0c4802f3aed8b81522daa27d188c0319.jpg
5306d5f507c94f8808eb18abedaf2340.jpg

This little piece has started to take off and the background doesn't hurt!
e6f924902f5663efb25d47caa5f49353.jpg

Ok have a close look at this pic.. tell me what you see...
f54a45047c348d070bed6556f7e82410.jpg

My other Robin Hood piece. Lower down in the tank..
a58be22e7e04e3576a09eb89476aa3d4.jpg

Waiting for this guy to blow!
0aa19048da72ca0c721c70ea6e389e77.jpg

Ice fire!
dacb8c5f868547668c4b5830915f0ba8.jpg

Few more to follow.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You better promise to take some blue shots as well Matt!! Haha

Stunning but nothing less can be expected from you my friend! :)
 
I must lost track here a while...
Lanthanum chloride dosing!? Any link that I can learn its benefit? Very interested.

BTW, excellent coral as always.

Cheers,
 
Thanks, Shih. Lanthanum chloride is simply a phosphate binder. The bound p is then either removed via skimmer or filter sock.
I dose it into a reservoir in my system that is just up stream from my skimmer and then filter sock..
I watched Mark use it for a year with great results.
There is always concern about the bound p settling in the system and what may happen to it but if you can use it in a way that allows for proper filtering, there doesn’t seem to be a down side. Like gfo or any phosphate remover, you just don’t want to over dose it and drop p too quickly.
 
Wonderful pics Matt.

I've used LC for over a year, no filter sock, first chamber of the sump. I think those that ran into issues overdosed, it's easy to do. I'm now at 1 drop every 3 days after dropping PO4 to undetectable on the Hanna ULR checker (1ppb). I read about people doing a lot heavier dosing and I think that's just asking for trouble, though a filter sock should mitigate some of the issues.

Just my opinion though, no data. I need to get another test done to see if it shows up. Does Triton test for it?
 
I looked into using lanthanum chloride years ago after a fellow reefer buddy in Canada was utilizing it so successfully. I think there are a few concerns with it though: 1) it can precipitously reduce PO4 which can result in severe adverse effect to corals 2) the precipitate can be detrimental to respiration of your livestock in particular clams, anemones, feather dusters and fish primarily tangs 3) it also binds with carbonate which will reduce alkalinity and 4) it can form a scale on your glass.

It seems the best way to prevent or at least reduce these potential adverse effects is use a diluted dose at a slow rate filtered through a 10 micron filter sock. I was too impressed by the potential adverse effects to utilize it. The more I read, the more concerned I became. But like many things, different approaches with a challenging material can bring about a good technique that maximizes the beneficial effects while minimizing or eliminating harmful outcomes. Although, I don’t think any test measures lanthanum chloride in aquarium water, it seemingly binds instantly to available phosphates and carbonates.
 
Last edited:
The following article written by Daniel Knop is very informative. It is, however, quite weak on the potential risks associated with its use in marine aquaria. I read somewhere that this chemical irritates the gills of fish. Furthermore, alkalinity may be reduced (if I remember correctly).

https://www.reef2rainforest.com/2017/03/16/foiling-phosphate-a-look-at-lanthanum-chloride-use-in-the-aquarium/
Very informative and interesting article, Bulent. Thanks for the link.
I think the biggest take away from it is to use LC cautiously and with the proper filtration methods in place.
Wonderful pics Matt.

I've used LC for over a year, no filter sock, first chamber of the sump. I think those that ran into issues overdosed, it's easy to do. I'm now at 1 drop every 3 days after dropping PO4 to undetectable on the Hanna ULR checker (1ppb). I read about people doing a lot heavier dosing and I think that's just asking for trouble, though a filter sock should mitigate some of the issues.

Just my opinion though, no data. I need to get another test done to see if it shows up. Does Triton test for it?
Hey Mark, thanks for your input. Your tank has been my trial tank ;)

And Watchguy Mark, thank you as well..
It would seem that most of the potential advers effects come from extreme use like over dosing and when treating very high phosphates.
Markalot Mark is only using a drop per day ..
Mark could you tell me which product you are using again? Is it phosphate rx?
Clearly it is pretty concentrated..
I am using Brightwell’s phosphate e which must be a little more diluted. I was using 6ml per day and now I will use 4ml per day to try to slow the reduction..
Once I get below .1, I will play with getting a maintenance dose..
I have had no side effects concerning my yellow, purple, or Kole tangs..
I would consider the amount I am using to be quite small and with the skimmer and filter sock downstream, I am confident enough to use it going forward...
I hope that like Mark, I will have to reduce my dosage to maintain a low phosphate level, in the future.
Well.. I will continue to post a weekly update on the phosphate situation..

Now, I just have to get my shy melanurus wrasse out of the frickin tank before my flatworm issue becomes a real concern.. he is eating any shrimp that goes into the tank and I NEED to get some peppermints in there soon!
 
Ok Mike, some pics to follow. ;)
That's a good question about the mh.. I think that 150w over a 30 inch deep tank would be pushing it a bit.. if I had 30 inches, I would go 250w de.
Awesome pics bud,pic quality and acro's health is something I will never get tired of seeing in your thread:thumbsup:

As for the mh's, that's what i was afraid of hearing.
ATM I run 3 150w on a 22inch tank and I'm really happy with that. But soon I will upgrade and tank will be 30inch and I wanted to avoid buying new balasts,bulbs etc.
Plus I thought that it would be better to have 3 sources of light(more cover area) instead of two of 250w.
Well what can you do:p
Thanks for your input bud:beer:
 
Hi Matt

I have been trying to steer away from the catching the acro bug again and go lps for ease of maintenance and less heartache. Thanks a lot for inspiring me and infecting me with the acro bug I suppose it never leaves you.
Your tank and coral care is stunning and a real credit to you well done!
Now I will have to reassess my tank:rollface:
 
^ PhosphateRx is what I use.
Thanks Mark.
Hi Matt

I have been trying to steer away from the catching the acro bug again and go lps for ease of maintenance and less heartache. Thanks a lot for inspiring me and infecting me with the acro bug I suppose it never leaves you.
Your tank and coral care is stunning and a real credit to you well done!
Now I will have to reassess my tank:rollface:

Thanks! Appreciate it. Very nice of you to say.
It's my absolute pleasure to inspire you! I don't think it does ever leave you.
Don't reassess, just add acros! ;)
 
Awesome pics bud,pic quality and acro's health is something I will never get tired of seeing in your thread:thumbsup:

As for the mh's, that's what i was afraid of hearing.
ATM I run 3 150w on a 22inch tank and I'm really happy with that. But soon I will upgrade and tank will be 30inch and I wanted to avoid buying new balasts,bulbs etc.
Plus I thought that it would be better to have 3 sources of light(more cover area) instead of two of 250w.
Well what can you do:p
Thanks for your input bud:beer:

Oops. Missed this.
No problem Mike!
For what it's worth, my tank is 26 inches high (25 inches of water) and the mh are probably a foot above the water... I have acros literally on the bottom of my tank..
Now, I also have 6 t5s and some decently powerfull but not crazy strong leds... if the mh will be your only light source, you may be pushing it a bit..
If you end up doing a super sexy/spooky scape like your current tank, maybe you'd be ok.. most of your current corals are fairly high up in the tank.. if you scape the acros up high, you might be just fine.
 
Back
Top