Lets do this - 225+ reef bar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Brandon - yea, I just use the 2-part from BulkReefSupply.com (with mag) - its worked well for me.

kar93 - yup, got the tunze osmolator up and running. I must say its a sweet piece of equipment. It is one of, if not the first, reef gadget that I hooked up, and it worked right away out of the box.
 
mcliffy2, what is wrong with the Snapper? I was looking into getting a Dart but if your having noise issues I may hold off. I thought all of the Reeflo's were suppose to be quiet? Also, who built your tank?
 
The Christmas wrasse is awesome, a model citizen.

Not sure what is wrong with the snapper, but mine is definitely a lemon. I have a dart sitting next to it that is powering my skimmer, and the dart is dead silent. So far Reeflo's customer service has been great. They are shipping me a new Snapper - all I have to do is mail the old one back to them once I receive the new one.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12636710#post12636710 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by NewSchool04
I'm really liking the lights hung with the wire!

Tank is looking awesome!

Thanks Pat, now I just need colors like yours to go with all the cool gadgets ;)
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12622141#post12622141 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by RyanBrucks
you know I always wondered if there was something fundamentally chemically diferent about the alk/calcium that gets added with the various methods.

that would make for an interesting study wouldn't it???

set up a control tank with 100% NSW changes, and then a few other tanks with synthetic conditions. One with calcium reactor, one with ionic dosing, one with kalk reactor, and then one with calcium + kalk. then place same-sized frags of the same colony in each tank and measure growth as well as cal/alk consumption. crudely given idea but just an idea.....

This would be a great question to bring over to the chemistry forum, I bet Randy would eat it up.

It would be very interesting. The tricky part is flow...IME proper flow is the #1 most important factor for SPS growth. My non-scientific take on it is that the calcification of corals should be directly proportional to the amount of calc/alk they come in contact with, which is directly proportionate to flow over the surface of the coral. The calcification seems to me to be the base...and only then does light and food come into play as the skin grows around the skeleton.

Brandon - I was looking into the balling method, and I guess what I was thinking of is generally called balling method "light". Its essentially automated dosing of 2-part calc/alk/mag, then you hand dose some trace elements (which IMO could simply be weekly water changes :) ).
 
While your on the topic of flow, can you elaborate more? Do you mean more of a random flow like say the hydor koralia power heads provide, the somewhat automated feeling of a wavebox, or constant flow that may come from a return, or a manifold?
 
nice sps flow theory =) here's mine...

high flow "excites" the the sps's cells. They "think" they are in a turbulent area and thus must grow fast to keep up with repairs and damage caused by breakage, storms, turbulent areas type things. In our tanks though, they never experience a real storm or turbulent type things thus appear to just grow huge/fast!

of course lighting helps them metabolize and "keep up the pace" and then the current takes away the waste.

Low current, low light... and you get the slow growing deep water sps. They don't have the inherent "exciting" mechanism.

how did i come up with this nonsense? I thought about how our bodies, plants and children's bodies quickly react to dmg and how the nearby cells increase growth for "repairs"
 
I kind of agree with Chris' theory of flow. Though Ive never experienced it with SPS. I would put my smaller Xenia and mushrooms in a high flow area, and I would notice the stalks would get thick and branch, or the mushrooms would try to split. Almost as if they were preparing for survival. I can see that translating to SPS behavior.
 
I like and agree with your theory Chris. I've found my SPS has grown thicker with higher flow, but only some types. E.g. stags grow thicker, but birdsnest branches don't grow thicker, instead the branches grow closer together.

So what about random flow, vs. constant flow?
 
Id think random flow would have more to do with keeping detritus from settling in one place. Not so much to do with corals... just my thoughts though.
 
Wow great build. glad to see that the tank situation work out for you. I was wondering what they used for your black background and does it cover the inside of the over flow? Also are the teeth for you over flow removable?
 
I still think its more about calcification and/or nutrients (with soft corals). The more water the corals contact the more calcium (in the case of hard corals) or nutrients (in the case of soft corals) are brought to the corals. more "food" = more growth. I think the randomness is important because it allows the corals to "process" more. If its all from one direction the polyps close up, but if the polyps are blown back and forth and you take the absolute value of the flow, they can withstand greater velocity back and forth, than in one direction.

Here are some good articles on laminar flow v. chaotic flow, the conclusion might surprise...

http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2007/1/aafeature/view
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12642832#post12642832 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Dejavu
Wow great build. glad to see that the tank situation work out for you. I was wondering what they used for your black background and does it cover the inside of the over flow? Also are the teeth for you over flow removable?

The teeth are removable, but I'd have to superglue it back in :) The teeth are actually just black egg crate, but it works very well. They used some kind of paint that I guess is reef safe. The drawback is that it scratches off easily, so I'm going to need to touch it up in spots.
 
After rereading that article on flow I'm thinking of re-arranging my powerheads, thoughts?

AO%20Aquarium%20flow.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top