As entertaining as this is, it's a little like leaving my kids with a task, only to come back 15 minutes later to discover a fight has broken out and the task hasn't even been started...
All of this is irrelevant... I'm not going to use t5. That may make me an idiot... I don't really care. The challenge has been set to use LED in my mind.
I've been testing a couple of frags under the 165w black box I've got... monti digi, porites and an acro... should give a decent indicator across the light demands of sps. The acro started to brown out at a par of 160 or lower, and coloured up again at 220... I appreciate that a large part of this isn't just par, it's spectrum too, but it's par being argued here. The monti and the porites are growing and coloured normally under both those par readings.
They all lose polyps from the underside of the branches (with the exception of the acro frag, which doesn't have branches lol. Short of mounting all my sps on mirrors, there's little I can do about this other than provide a more even spread of LED fixtures (test is directly under one 165w fixture, so very one directional light).
It's fair to say the acro has shown growth under the 220 plus par readings.
I toyed with the idea of removing the lenses, but that will equal a pretty bad reduction in par. Instead I'm going to butcher the 165 unit, replace the clear cover with frosted glass to act as a diffuser and put a reflector behind the leds to bounce back the light reflected off the frosted glass. I anticipate that this should provide a much more t5 type of light, better blending, less disco etc etc. All without losing the benefits of LED.
Dare I say that I largely agree that t5 is probably the 'best' lighting for SPS... However, for me, I can't get over the running costs vs cheap LED units. So if I can create t5-esque light using a black box, I'll be as happy as Larry.
Oh and does anyone have experience of the LedZeal Malibu lights... that was my reason for restarting this thread after all
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk