I believe someone mentioned that the flow should start from the bottom up as it will prevent detritus from settling on the siporax media itself.
650lt net volume system, reactor with 7lt seachem denitrator since mid of January , flow the first 3 months was ~ 450 lt/h, the next 3 months reduced to ~300lt/h and the last month is less than 150lt/h, still with no measurable results! The water supplied to thr reactor is filtered through a sponge.NO3 was 0 when I filled the reactor and now are 5-8, but I increased the number of fish from 15 to 35, mainly small ones, and also started feeding dailly live phytoplankton and rotifers, so I really wonder if anyone has measurable proof that denitrification does occur.
For nearly 10 months I continued to run seachem denitrator ,as described above, having no evidence decreasing or increasing my system no3. But since last Friday I took it off, to try a different way achieving denitrification http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2587610, I can definitely say that it was just producing no3. Even I was filtering the water supplied into the reactor, when I took out seachem denitrator , I realise how much detritus was trapped into there!. In just 3 days, no3 reduced from about 8 ppm to 2.5ppm!!
Detritus accumulated inside those media can increase NO3 for sure. Even with 2 stage filtered water , supplied in the reactor, through sponges, I couldn't avoid that.I can see how this media could work like a mechanical filter when used in a reactor. I just got 8 liters in the mail yesterday. I was planning on using it like live rock in the sump (in nylon media bags). I will have to make sure it doesn't accumulate detritus.
I can see how this media could work like a mechanical filter when used in a reactor. I just got 8 liters in the mail yesterday. I was planning on using it like live rock in the sump (in nylon media bags). I will have to make sure it doesn't accumulate detritus.
Hopefully your bags are mesh. I used nylon that was tightly woven and it kept my matrix from working.
Which bags did you use that worked good?
I looked on their web site. Is this the one you got?Mine didn't work at all. They got clogged and could not let water through. I got bins from Wal-Mart and used them! Works great, easy better than bags.
Just stumbled onto this thread a few days ago and finally finished reading through this. I think this is freakin fantastic!
Congrats to both rucnnefish and slin for successful implementation of matrix and siporax. I do wonder, if one has to dose phos and nitrates despite having a lot of fish does it not mean there's too much of the media in one's system?
Dosing 10ppm Nitrate and 1ppm Phospate twice a day
Feeding four large serves pellets and 1 cube frozen lobster eggs.
System current capabilities, a 30 ppm Nitrate to 0 ppm Nitrate in 10 hours
And 0.08 Hanna phos to 0.00 Phos in 10 Hours :celeb1:
No carbon dosing , just siporax in the coast to coast
Need more fish :beer:
Just wanted add to this thread. A few weeks ago I started my new tank with 10 litres of Siporax and 4 litres of Seachem Matrix. The tank was scaped with dead rock; Real Reef Rock and ReefFlowers Sand. The Real Reef Rock provide zero filtration as the stuff is pretty much solid and not porous at all.
All the tanks filtration is handled by entirely the Siporax and Matrix and whatever that is usually done by shallow sand beds.
I added the first tester Acropora frags after only 5 days of adding water to the tank. Within 2 weeks I had transferred 40% of the Acros. By week 3 I transferred over most of my Acros.
I had zero issues other than all the Acros (30 pieces at least) browning out; but thats not surprising the tank is less than a month old. Approaching week 4 I noticed some Acros starting to colour up. I also noticed new growth; broken tips had regrown and were with colour and bases growing as well.
IMO that is a real indication that this stuff is a very viable alternative to liverock; or at the very least, it provides a much needed boost to the filtration capacity when utilizing minimal rockscapes in the display.
Just a couple of quick shots to show how I have the Siporax/Matrix setup. Previously I dumped the Siporax in the sump. This works fine, but inevitably, detritus builds up. Hence I stacked the Siporax in a basket I made and all seems to be working well so far.
And a shot of my new tank. Tank is a shallow 4x2. About 95G.
That's a great set up and example of how to do it well. I'm sure that nutrients spiked at some point, how long before it started to lower and do you use any vinegar or other carbon dosing?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just wanted add to this thread. A few weeks ago I started my new tank with 10 litres of Siporax and 4 litres of Seachem Matrix. The tank was scaped with dead rock; Real Reef Rock and ReefFlowers Sand. The Real Reef Rock provide zero filtration as the stuff is pretty much solid and not porous at all.
All the tanks filtration is handled by entirely the Siporax and Matrix and whatever that is usually done by shallow sand beds.
I added the first tester Acropora frags after only 5 days of adding water to the tank. Within 2 weeks I had transferred 40% of the Acros. By week 3 I transferred over most of my Acros.
I had zero issues other than all the Acros (30 pieces at least) browning out; but thats not surprising the tank is less than a month old. Approaching week 4 I noticed some Acros starting to colour up. I also noticed new growth; broken tips had regrown and were with colour and bases growing as well.
IMO that is a real indication that this stuff is a very viable alternative to liverock; or at the very least, it provides a much needed boost to the filtration capacity when utilizing minimal rockscapes in the display.
Just a couple of quick shots to show how I have the Siporax/Matrix setup. Previously I dumped the Siporax in the sump. This works fine, but inevitably, detritus builds up. Hence I stacked the Siporax in a basket I made and all seems to be working well so far.
And a shot of my new tank. Tank is a shallow 4x2. About 95G.