I'm asking about sticking only high-kelvin whites over a tank of coral, with no blues. It won't work. And when you use high-kelvin whites, you are required to use more to get a nice 14k or 20k color- 1:1 seems to work for many.I do not know how much you know about LED and phosphorus technology but in general – if you want a lower Kelvin and higher CRI – you will lose more of the output from the original blue led in the transformation to a white look. If you look at Cree’s own table of the XM-L output you will see this. For Cool White (5000-8000K) they have 300 Lumen at 700 mA, NW (3000-5000K) – 260 Lumen and down to 185 Lumen for 85 and 90 CRI white (2700 K – 3200 K) My bottom line is that you lose a lot of energy when you transform the blue light to low Kelvin whites – therefore you can’t compare the way you do
I totally disagree with you - I have 4 years experiences with only high Kelvin LEDs over coral tanks. I have also experiences with Cree XLM on other tanks. You have to explain for me what makes a warm white LED better for growth compared with a High Kelvin LED. The last 5 months I have run 3 DC over the tank (420,430,445,455 nm blue, 10 000 and 16 000 K white). The growth has been very good.
It’s exactly what I have done for 4 years - and I have also seen what happens. And it is not what you indicate....
Wow, so your in agreeance with the white input from the other thread. I keep hearing about a new DC, maybe they need to cut back on white channel. Do you have your whites dialed up just at viewing times?
I'm asking about sticking only high-kelvin whites over a tank of coral, with no blues. It won't work. And when you use high-kelvin whites, you are required to use more to get a nice 14k or 20k color- 1:1 seems to work for many.
But, with lower kelvin whites, it doesn't matter if they are generally more inefficient. The fact that they are Cree, and the fact that you need to use less to get a nice color is a big plus.
So unless that 10k white is getting more than 2x the output of a single Cree neutral white(you can run NW in a 2:1 ratio of RB:NW), than it's not worth it.
Lumens are also not the compelte picture for whites. As I mentioned before, lower kelvin whites have a lot more "useful" spectrum in them than cool whites, especially 660nm red. It's not critical for coral growth, but it's there.
EDIT: Looking at this datasheet: http://www.wayjun.com/Datasheet/Led/10W%20Epistar%2045mil%20Chip%20High%20Power%20LED.pdf
and comparing it to the Cree XM-L datasheet, we can see that the Cree cool white at 1000ma gets 416lm in the highest bin, minimum. It runs at about 3v at 1000ma, so we get around 138lm/w. By contrast, the Epistar at 1050ma and 9.6v gets a minimum of 810lm, for an overall efficiency of 75lm/w minimum. That's a TON less. And those are at about the same color temperature.
<WARNING>assumptions ahead. Most of the following is probably flawed.
Now, accounting for the changes in luminosity with color temperature, we see that the lumen output at test current is 300lm for cool white, 260 for neutral, and 220 for warm. That's from 2600k, to 3700k, to 5000k. About a 1200k difference per step. And you get 18% more output with warm to neutral, and 11% from neutral to cool. So every step, percentages are multiplies by 11/18 to get the percentage increase for the next step.
To get to 10000k, we can multiply that 1200k step by about 4 to get to 9800k, which is close. So we calculate.
1. 416lm * (0.11 * 11/18 + 1) = 443.
2. 443 * (0.06722 * 11/18 + 1) = 461.
3. 461 * (1.04107 * 11/18 + 1) = 473.
4. 473 * (1.02509 * 11/18 + 1) = 480.
So, a VERY rough estimate is 480lm for a Cree 9800k minimum white when run at 1000ma. That's about a 15.3% increase, although the numbers are off by a bit. Versus a neutral white with 360lm at 1000ma, that's a 33.3% increase. But because you only need half the number of neutrals to get the same effect on color as a cold white, it's a better bargain and you can have more blue, royal blue, and violet.
lower kelvin whites have a lot more "useful" spectrum in them than cool whites, especially 660nm red
You will have more blue wavelengths with using high Kelvin LEDs - you forget that a high Kelvin LED by definition has more left of the original blue wavelength. And we are not talking about only 10 000 K - we are talking about 16 000 K also. You also totally forget that colours of corals is not only depending of reflection - corals are unique because much of their colours come from fluorescence. When you use low Kelvin whites you directly hit our eyes more sensitive parts (that the reason why they are developed from the lighting industry) and you will blind out the weaker light sources (a coral that use fluorescence is indeed a light source). To get the beatuful colours of the fluorescence you need to tune down the low Kelvin whites a lot and you will get at very blue tint in your aquarium. With high Kelvin LEDs and especially with the Pacific Sun method you do not need to turn down the white light (at least not so much with high Kelvin and not at all with the RGB method) and you will also get the reflecting colours because you will still have these wavelenghts with.
The 660 nm red is (IMO) of no value for corals - it has disappear already at a depth around 1.5 m in nature. If you are growing freshwater plants and macro algae - thats another question. Still I do not understand what you mean with more "useful" spectrum - please give examples
Sincerely Lasse
I don't think he's trying to promote his products. I personally see no real advertising there, unless it's subliminal.Lasse:
Why is it that you are unable to post without using subtle (weasely?) means to drum up business? Is that you simply have no respect for the rules or is it that you have no respect for the rest of us that follow the rules?
Instead of playing games and taking the time to CROP the screenshots AND ADD "CENSORSHIP" text to the tile, why not just crop the title bar out? One step instead of two? Showing the software you (or your friend, whatever) sells and pasting the word "CENSORED" over it is simply a means to generate interest said software/hardware... but you already know that.
While I enjoy your contributions to the discussion, your continued efforts (albeit subtle ones) to promote your products are getting rather tired.
Man, I've been away for 4 months and have now returned to RC and this discussion and you're still at it. If someone is getting tiring it's you, absolutely not bringing anything new to the topic, while seemingly the only reason you are here is to accuse Lasse of "subtle promotion of his products".While I enjoy your contributions to the discussion, your continued efforts (albeit subtle ones) to promote your products are getting rather tired.
I am very interested in this build....
My two 250watt Radiums have been online for about 3-months now and I am looking to go LED when the times comes to change the bulbs.
My question is, can I build a multi chip fixture that will match the Radium 20k color spectrum and have a little more PAR? And how much in terms of Watts could I expect to save in switching to this led setup.
If so, to save me from spending 2-months reading through close to 4000 post's, can some one Please post a parts list of the latest and greatest (led chip & power supply) for this type of build?
-Alex.
Good summary, SUMMERS! I might add this thread on the LLD's and boards http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2222702 and I'm using a Jarduino as a controller (Google it)