the pump should be sized for the size of the skimmer, not the size of the tank.
I'll give you MY opinion. I have the SVS3-30" with the Mag 12. I have also an MTC 36" recirculating skimmer and have been changing them out from time to time. Prior to these, I had a Bubble King Mini 160 and a Bubble King Double Cone 150 on this same tank at different times.
To get my opinion across, I'm not going to say which skimmers performed better. I will just say that my tank always looked good regardless of which skimmer I was running and there has never been any change in terms of getting any algae. So maybe all of these skimmers are "good enough"?
Now with that said, both the Lifereef and the MTC are easier to run as they don't get the calcium deposits in the venturis that the two BK needle wheel skimmers did.
Ken
how much clearance do you need for the 30 I only have 31 inches of clearance under my stand will I be able to get the cup off
Ken , not to put you on the spot but in one of your earlier post's when you hooked up the MTC and the lifereef skimmers for the first week or so , you said that both skimmers outperformed your previous skimmers by quite a bit ? IE:darker skimmate and more of it .
Are you saying that you is not the case now ?
Also, I've also owned pinwheel skimmers in the past and quite frankly never really found them to clog up with salt creep faster than venturi's ?
Here's a quick tease from Jeff on my skimmer.
What pump and injector will you be using? I never thought of asking Jeff to go with a wider diameter body, I wish I would have done that
I will start out using a Panworld 40PX I have. This pump work great on my 48" so I figure it should be good for this skimmer.
Maybe this isn't the place to ask this question, I don't know.. But, that pump is rated at 1270gph, it seems like it's a bit underkill since people are running mag12's on 30" bodies, even then some people are running their 30" bodies up around 1800gph. Is it because it works well at higher head pressures? I realize this is what Jeff recommends on his website, but I'm just trying to connect the dots. It seems like that tall body could withstand a pump that is significantly larger.
My bad, will be using a 100PX which is the same as a Blueline 40HD, 790gph, pressure rated. I find the pressure rated 100PX pump work better then the 100PX-X. I ran the 100PX on a 30" and it was too much. When I stepped it down to a 50PX the 30" and 36" skimmer ran great. Forcing water through the injector with the pressure rated pump seemed to work better, IMO.
Can you explain the "pressure rated" part of these pumps?
Panworld 100PX = 790gph at 21ft Head Pressure
Panworld 100PX-X = 1270gph at 13ft Head Pressure
I find that when your pushing water through a small orifice like the injectors have the higher pressure pump works better. I also noticed an increase in air draw with the higher pressure rated pump (seemed to force the water through the injector with a greater velocity). I found with the higher flow lower pressure rated pump I lost a good bit of flow and air draw. One thing, you can't run to great of a pressure rated pump like the 150PS (I did this and the flow and air draw were too much for the 36" and 48" skimmer (never tried it on the 60"). I was pulling 45-50scfh on the air and unless you want a huge foam head (like 3-4" thick, unstable) this is not the pump to run. By the way, this skimmer will be in my sump plumbed to my external pump.
The velocity of water passing through the venturi would be the same as long as the GPH is the same between the two pumps?
So if you have a 1500gph pump pushing 1k gph and then you have a 1100gph pressure rated pump pushing that same 1k gph you should have the same pressure/velocity/flow?
So maybe what you were obtaining a more ideal flow with the pressure rated pump than you were with the other? Now if your outlets are different on the two pumps and one has to convert into a smaller pipe that could affect the pressure... but still the pressure/velocity would be based on the gph being obtained not the pump?