Peter Eichler
New member
JUst out of curiosity, did you dose trace elements, amino acids, or anything like that when you were have problems with zoanthids Puff?
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12891740#post12891740 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Pufferpunk
I do 20% WC every 2 weeks & dose trace elements occasionally.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12892009#post12892009 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Trotter
AHH HA!!! Then there is no way that the Vitamin C is doing anything. It MUST be something else!!!! Hahaha.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12892103#post12892103 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by OCEAN SIZE
An anecdote that comes to my mind (fully applicable or not)...
Centuries ago, Turkish mothers used to load a tiny amount of smallpox from infected people on pins, then pinprick their childrens skin. Westerners thought this was completely insane; at best it was useless, worst it was infanticide.
The Turkish mothers had no concept whatsoever of microbiology. It was the 16th-18th centuries, the Ottomans did not share as much in the Age of Reason, and they were Muslim women. But unlike Western Europeans, their kids survived smallpox epidemics at an astonishing rate.
As much as science is about skepticism, the scientific method, and proof, it is also about acceptance that the universe is not wholly understood and repeatable observations are the basis of scientific law.
Peter- barebottom tanks, carbon dosing, and other trends have come back into fashion, and as there is greater understanding of reefkeeping because of the conversations and shared observations we discuss, the legitimate effects can be honed in on.
I mean this with the utmost respect and agree that a side-by side tank analysis with an identical water feed source, same maintenance routines would provide more observational proof.
Me, I'm inclined to err on the side of lab-grade Vitamin C dosing from what I've read. But I think its important to continue the discussion, even from the perspective of skepticism in my opinion.
SIDE NOTE - I had a system crash at the end of this post (GRRR!) but Firefox 3.0 recovered this message in the Quick Reply. F-yeah Firefox!
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12894246#post12894246 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Pufferpunk
In answer to a few of the Qs above:
I never dosed trace elements in any of my other tanks--just more recently (within the past 2 years) in the larger, main display tank I have now (90g) & only between WC. I never dosed alk, Ca or Mg in my 1st reef tank (55g), where the problem of losing zoas started. I had large colonies of close to 100 polyps, melt & are entirely gone. I have more recently (since adding VC), seen a single polyp I didn't even know was there, grow into a colony of over 20 polyps within a month. I do not think the larger polyps size, sudden growth rate & brighter colors are because of the natural progression of my tank.
Jeff said he had stopped using VC & could definately see a difference in his corals when he stopped & have since restarted the dosing.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12897336#post12897336 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Whalehead9
Peter - are you currently running any carbon sources to your tank at the moment? The reason that I ask is that I was thinking along the same lines and posted a few questions in the chemistry forum. I asked in particular what VC actually breaks down into. Holmes-Farley sent me a message back with the answer. I will try to find it later, and post it here. It might be posted in this monstrous thread somewhere, I cannot remember.
The gist of it was that is does not directly break down into any metabolic energy sources. However with all of the anecdotal evidence that it is acting as a carbon source, (bacterial mats, heavy nasty skimmate, etc.) I wonder if VC is acting as a more complex carbon source that can eliminate the worry of monoculture that many other vodka dosers worry about.
I this is a major stretch, but I wonder if VC acts to probiotically helps eliminate the nasty bacteria causing the melting zoos.
I know that this stuff is not a magic dust, but I am now considering using VC as a carbon source to go along with the Glassbox VSV recipe. One part iVSV in the morning and then dry VC later. Because of the ability not not acutely overdose this stuff when the tank is used to a carbon dosing regime, it could help be a solver to the monoculture.
Just my 2 cents.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12901778#post12901778 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by DEEC77
They tried to cure polio with mega doses of VC, on tonight's episode of House
I saw that too.![]()
It seems to me that every carbon source has a specific microalgea that it attacks. I would be really interested to see the results of dosing with all the available sources vinager,sugar vodka, and VC.
Puffy if I remember correctly you as well as some of the others said that you treated for cyano before starting VC and haven't had any since correct? I did try sugar a while back and it worked great except I got cyano after awhile. Which in turn had some of my Zao's close up but no melting. I slowly stop dosing sugar and the cyano went away and zao opened. So perhaps VC lowers your phosphates in some way? As sugar lowers you nitrates. Just a thought?
~Dee~
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12900282#post12900282 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Pufferpunk
Folks have already stated in this thread that their ORP levels drop after adding VC but no one has said it has caused any problems & it rebounds quickly.