Supporting the pipe from above is a good solution for the weight of the pipe for sure.
The hanging PVC flex and it's full water weight 'pulling' on the joint at the union is what I think you'd want to look at supporting? Not that I know of any joints pulling apart in such situations. I know on my PVC flex connection I tried to support the hanging flex. Not trying to make you worry and it may not even be a concern.
I did think about this briefly and decided to wait and see how the system acted under flow. The runs of flex are relatively short, and the glue sockets quite deep, so I wasn't worried about weight, but I did think weight plus constant vibration might be a problem over time. If the lines were visibly vibrating or I could feel significant vibration in them then I was going to look into supports. Fortunately, even at 150gpm, there was no visible or sensible vibration in the flex lines.
Looks great, excited to see how that Hydrowizard works. I wonder if the wall of Tunzes will give a more uniform flow, even if the Hydrowizard is the same strength.
I'm very curious as well. I hope the Hydro Wizard flow is just as good. Would much rather deal with maintenance on 2 powerheads than 6.
Are you using a vs, or vf model pump? Have you tried to disable the priming mode? You are below it so it isn't nessassary to have it enabled.
I'm not sure what model the Sparus is based on. It is described as self-priming in the product manual, but there is no mention of a way to defeat the priming. For that matter, there is no mention of any of the menu settings in the manual, only electrical and mechanical info. I'll poke around in the pump controller menus to see if I can find a priming on/off option.
i'm concerned about the Hydro wizard ECM 63 being a fish killer? my mp60 has killed two fish and one sand sifter starfish and i guess the Hydro wizard ECM 63 is much more power?
I'm hoping it won't be any more dangerous than the Streams, perhaps even less since there is a full grill in front of the prop. It does flow 3.5x more than the streams, so intake suction could be a concern. On this front, it has substantially more area over which to distribute the intake and the louvers are further apart, so I find it plausible that the intake surface area is at least 3.5x greater than on the Streams, meaning no more intake force than with the Stream. Exceptionally small fish could swim in the intake, but I won't be keeping anything smaller than green chromis.
erics3000, Chicago, mwilliams62, M Reed, rdevoe11 - thanks for joining the thread!
Last edited: