Hi all,
Certainly I am new to posting on this topic, yet old at thinking about the optical needs of our wet friends. I must seriously ask the question below. It arises as an engineer/quantum-physicist very much aware of the specific attributes of natural light at water depth & optical generation sources, growing up much of the time in the Bahamian waters & having a 240g reef or 12 years.
Given the following observations:
-- Countless post asking for the ââ"šÂ¬Ã…"œWhat is the right amount of lightââ"šÂ¬Ã‚Â, ââ"šÂ¬Ã‚ÂWhat is the best lighting,ââ"šÂ¬Ã‚ Ã¢â"šÂ¬Ã…"œWill this be enough or too much lightââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢"šÂ¬Ã‚Âââ"šÂ¬Ã‚¦.
-- Ditto same question for filtering, water movement, additives, feeding, co-inhabitants, and many ore very critical husbandry parametric.
-- Every we are asked about what is the ââ"šÂ¬Ã…"œbestââ"šÂ¬Ã‚ for some specific environmental controlling contrivance, or the cause of some specific problem, we instantly ask about many other equal or greater critical methodology
-- We all would expect and accept radically different results between identical systems maintained by different people, and even greater divergence when the systems are similar in one specific domain, but are either different or unknown for others.
I have this question:
What are the other ââ"šÂ¬Ã…"œthingsââ"šÂ¬Ã‚ the ââ"šÂ¬Ã…"œotherââ"šÂ¬Ã‚ aquarists are doing that are necessary, but not sufficient, and are of great importance perhaps far greater that the ââ"šÂ¬Ã…"œlight bulbââ"šÂ¬Ã‚ being used?
These boards are so fantastic for our ââ"šÂ¬Ã…"œhobby.ââ"šÂ¬Ã‚ No longer held prisoner by the LFS.
Absolutc, Amazing work you have accomplished, what do you seriously believe is the ââ"šÂ¬Ã…"œone thing that make the difference? And thank you also for contacting the other aquarists.