Australian/tongan import restrictions

Subject: Competent Management and Scientific Authorities for CITES Documents

Background: The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) requires each CITES Party country to designate a Management Authority and a Scientific Authority for, among other things, issuance of CITES documents. The treaty also requires each non-Party country to have competent authorities that can issue comparable CITES documentation. U.S. CITES regulations that went into effect on September 24, 2007 require the Party or non-Party issuing CITES documents to have designated a Management Authority and a Scientific Authority and communicated such designations to the CITES Secretariat. Such authorities must be competent to make the required legal and biological findings in order to issue valid CITES documents.

As of April 30, 2008, the following countries had not provided information to the CITES Secretariat on their designated Management Authority and/or Scientific Authority:

Afghanistan, Andorra, Angola, Armenia, Bahrain, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cape Verde, Cook Islands, Eritrea, Haiti, Holy See, Kiribati, Maldives, Marshall Islands, Montenegro, Nauru, Niue, Oman, Timor-Leste, Tonga, Turkmenistan and Tuvalu.

Action: The United States will not allow the import of CITES-listed specimens from countries that have not designated a competent Management Authority and Scientific Authority and communicated such designations to the CITES Secretariat. Any such shipments will be subject to seizure and forfeiture because of invalid CITES documents. The trade can check for updated information on these designations at: http://www.cites.org/common/directy/e_directy.html.
 
I'm betting it's all about paperwork, though some new 'guidelines' may have been added. We'll see...
 
Wow, first there's something fishy in Denmark and now there's something wrong-a in Tong-a.
From Philip's post it looks like the Marshall and Cook Islands are also on the list; some nice fish are imported from both places.
I wonder if any of the brilliant people who concocted this CITES treaty have in mind some particular south-sea islander who would be competent to make the required legal and biological findings? And I'm sure the Afghan people have 100's of extra Phd's in biology with nothing better to do with their time than fill out paper work for CITES :rolleyes: Meanwhile, collectors on these islands who are barely making subsitence wages as it is now have no jobs at all, and coral prices in the U.S. (which are already astonomical) will go up faster than milk and gas put together. Great!
Mariner
 
Just so you know fish are not CITES. There is a few but not what the hobby uses. The main cites items are coral, live rock and clams.
 
CITES covers mostly scleractinic materials (sonties, rock, etc.), as Philip stated. A lot of softies aren't covered, also.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12467195#post12467195 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Philip Root
Just so you know fish are not CITES. There is a few but not what the hobby uses. The main cites items are coral, live rock and clams.
I stand corrected...errrr...informed! Please remove all reference to fish in my previous post :)
Sorry to be so sarcastic/skeptical earlier, but the whole thing just smacks of overzealous eco do-gooders in Western countries (the countries that do most of the real damage to the environmnent) imposing a bunch of buearocratic nonsense on other nations to control the use of THEIR natural resources -- with little thought to the very real human cost involved.
FWIW, JMO,
Mariner
 
Back
Top