Wow that's some nice PAR off those.... From the readings though it doesn't seem to spread very far even with the wide-ish optics STU used. Wonder if it could cover a 3'x2 from 48" above without a huge spotlight effect.
Ok I have a 10A max multimeter. If I turn it to 10A reading in the series nothing comes up. If I turn the meter to VDC and hook it up to the series it makes one LED turn on VERY lightly and it reads 16.7.
Any clue?
-Dave
Grim - Thanks!
I used the ledsupply "wide frosted lens" http://ledsupply.com/10509.php
I shows a 36.7 degree illum. pattern.
So what is your conclusion? I was shooting for each of those pendants to be the equivalent of a 400 W MH. Do you think I made it, fell short, exceeded?
My rule of thumb was that you can get equivalent light with 1/3 the watts from LEDs.
Since those are rated to run at 150 watts each ( but I turn them down some ) I was hoping to be better than a 450 W MH on each.
Stu
Grim,
"How many LED's are on each one? I must be missing something here. Pic shows 16 with room for 8 more. Are the drivers wasting a lot of power?
I'd say they are easily in line with 250's but 400's? Not based on the readings I got over that front tank. "
Those pendants have 16 each of these:
![]()
So each pendant has 24 Cool White XP-Gs & 24 Royal blue for a total of 48 LEDs each.
Stu
Grim; Just for reference what's the PAR at a south Pacific reef at noon?
WOW.. So even bright setups... aren't.
Definitely not, but then you have people like Sanjay Joshi stating that numbers between 200 and 400 are probably more than enough for anything we're likely to keep!