Does lineage matter to you?

""""You mentioned your "AWE Rouge"- what is the definition of what this coral is? IE- How is it identified? Secondly, where can I buy one, and be "assured" that it is whatever you are saying it is (per the answer to my first question)?""""

The color on the AWE rouge mill stands out. It is a rich pink that borders on red. Polyps are a light green in color. I sell them, as does tyree and a handful of other vendors who have picked up pieces from me. This coral came in a Kupang Shipment I received is '02. If you want to be assured that you are buying the real thing, then buy from me , tyree or another vendor who you feel you trust will be honest with you. Compare the pictures of their colony to my pics. If you just like a rich pink/red mill with green polyps and don't care if it's off the original "AWE Rouge" then just buy one you think is pretty.

"""""The points I am trying to make is this- your corals is likely a very colorful, very lovely variety of Acropora millepora. But how does "AWE Rouge" gain you any value over a simple "pink Millepora", especially if you are the only person who can decipher it, and you are the only person that can supply it? Apparently, there is nothing to stop me from selling my pink millie as "todd's AWE Rouge", right? Because there is no valuable documentation or lineage to sow so. All would have to do is say I bought it form you, or bought it from Joe, who bought it from you, etc. You get my point.
Again, what is a "look a like"? If it looks like a coral, why is it different? Because it didn't come from you? """""""""



First, I am not the only person who can decipher it. Any consumer canlook at pics and notice the difference. I am not the only one who can supply it, either. What should stop you from selling your pink millie as my "AWE Rouge," is your morals and ethics. If you want to lie and say it is the same that's on you. If you want to say it is similar then great. I have a "AWE Monster Inc loripes" That I have often told people is very similar to Purple Monster. I am growing a frag of each in my system right next to each other so I can photograph the differences (or similarities). Like I said in my original post. The "Seller" who is dishonest will weed themselves out. Compare pictures and find people you trust before you buy.


"""""""""I agree "Don't market RC Cola as Coke". Although, being in the Atlanta area, everything that is brown and carbonated is "coke"!! (You get asked at restaurants, "what kinda coke you want with your burger?"). But I digress. Coke and RC are two established, visually differed products that have a marketed and obvious difference. If no one can establish what the difference between the two was in a scalable way, then by al;l means, market RC as Coke! Because, for all intent purposes, they are the same.""""""""

If you can't find a difference, I don't disagree. We could pour a glass of RC and sell it as coke to a customer and hand him it. He won't know until he tastes it if he got what he ordered. Now it's his. Was he lied to? Yes. If it's close or near identical, is it wrong to sell like this? I believe it is. Here in CA, I order a "diet Coke," and the server replies "We only have Diet Pepsi." I don't really care but I do like knowing what I am getting.


""""""I appreciate you wanting to "own" something unique, and creating a "brand" for a product you can market. But taking ownership of it under the current established "guidelines" is flawed in my opinion. How many other vendors could've gotten the exact colony that started your Rouge? Do they need to call it AWE Rouge? Or Do you need to call it Saltwater City Turbo Red (or whatever)?""""""""

I don't see it as ownership. As I stated above. I am not worried so much about "Credit" as I am worried about the customers who bought the same coral twice at the same show, or that bought a coral from John Doe as the "AWE Rouge" because they saw pics of my colony and wanted a piece. When they get it home and it is not coloring the same as the pics they have seen and there are brown bushy polyps. Color is faded pink almost brown except the tips. Then they tell their friends "The AWE Rouge suxxors!!!" Now if they got a coral that looks to be similar to "AWE Rouge" and all that happens, then they know they took a chance and it didn't work out. I don't think is flawed to offer frags off my colony as "AWE Rouge" or whatever name I see fit. I am simply trying to create a known product for the consumers. Customers deserve some degree of consistency in the products they are receiving. Is it ok for someone to call their millie "AWE Rouge." If they can confirm it's origin in the hobby to my colony, then no it's not wrong. If they just think it's similar or maybe even they think it's identical, but it's known lineage is not to my colony then YES it's wrong to mislead the customer. Say what it is "similar" ""Looks to be identical"" Opinion is not fact.


"""""""I had an interesting discussion on a local board recently on this topic. A LFS had posted that they just got in some blue sunset monti. I said, "what is that? You cant have that. Sunsets aren't blue". But, I got to thinking- says who? What is the guidelines for Sunset monti, or any named coral that is? While I still believe it was a poor marketing campaign for a rather dull piece, but it really starts to open that big can of worms."""""""

There are no guidelines. You are bound by you own integrity and ethics.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12643598#post12643598 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by RichConley
Another problem is the habit of "LE Posse" attacks. In Boston, we had one of the largest Reef clubs in the country. Several of Tyree's LEs were originally from corals in the tanks of reefers in my area. (there was a time when all you could get was wild caught).

Reefers who had the ORIGINAL colony try to sell a piece, and say "Same as tyree LE" and get blasted in public. The "LE posse" loves to keep their club exclusive, despite the fact that many of these LEs (or named exotics) are "weed corals" in certain areas of the country.

Haha, a very interesting fact. It seems to me that Steve Tyree is like a governing body for LE frags for many people.

Was checking out some online vendors, and my god, every coral is now named something. Doesn't that devalue their own product? Not in short term but in long term? When people start to view names as nothing more than letters without any meaning, they will stop this lineage thing altogether.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12645593#post12645593 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Atomikk

Was checking out some online vendors, and my god, every coral is now named something. Doesn't that devalue their own product? Not in short term but in long term? When people start to view names as nothing more than letters without any meaning, they will stop this lineage thing altogether.

I couldn't agree more.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12645619#post12645619 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Marko9
I couldn't agree more.

I look at it from a automobile perspective. Haven't you noticed that every vehicle is either Limited Edition, LE (luxury edition), XE (?), SE (special ed), etc, etc... Almost all cars have something on the back of them. So makes your more special than mine, and we both own the same brand?

Its the same thing with corals.

Unless you are physically there to unbag, or ship these corals, you have no idea with is rare (in the hobby, and not in the ocean).
 
And another thing.. while I am blabbing..

You want to prove lineage? Have two said pieces grow into each other. IF they sting themselves, they are not the same coral. If they grow into each other, then you got a match.

DNA is a beautiful thing.
 
Hey Todd:

I hope you weren't upset or aggravated by my post. I did not mean to do so, but instead was merely looking to get the insight from "the horses mouth", so to speak.

The color on the AWE rouge mill stands out. It is a rich pink that borders on red. Polyps are a light green in color. I sell them, as does tyree and a handful of other vendors who have picked up pieces from me. This coral came in a Kupang Shipment I received is '02. If you want to be assured that you are buying the real thing, then buy from me , tyree or another vendor who you feel you trust will be honest with you. Compare the pictures of their colony to my pics. If you just like a rich pink/red mill with green polyps and don't care if it's off the original "AWE Rouge" then just buy one you think is pretty.

This is the type of issue I see. You delinietaing feature are entirely subjective and personal. The only difference is a arguably subtle difference in coloration? That can be interpreted, or more precisely, misinterpreted excessively, would you not agree? Besides, with this coral retain this color in my tank? If it doesn't, is it no longer a AWE Rouge?

Also, only "a handful" of vendor are carrying this? How can this not be determined as elitist? Especially when the sole criterion for its determination is color, and, according to your claims, anyone can pick it out.



I don't see it as ownership. As I stated above. I am not worried so much about "Credit" as I am worried about the customers who bought the same coral twice at the same show, or that bought a coral from John Doe as the "AWE Rouge" because they saw pics of my colony and wanted a piece. When they get it home and it is not coloring the same as the pics they have seen and there are brown bushy polyps. Color is faded pink almost brown except the tips. Then they tell their friends "The AWE Rouge suxxors!!!" Now if they got a coral that looks to be similar to "AWE Rouge" and all that happens, then they know they took a chance and it didn't work out. I don't think is flawed to offer frags off my colony as "AWE Rouge" or whatever name I see fit. I am simply trying to create a known product for the consumers. QUOTE]

I guess our difference in opinion seems to be stemming from this type of comment. You seem to be comparing your AWE Rouge with a coke bottle, and the pink millie being sold as AWE Rouge as the RC Cola. However, your identifying criterion rely on visual aspects. So, what fool would buy Coke if the outside says RC Cola?! It doesnt make sense. Essentially, you're stating it obvious and easy to see the difference, but you're afraid of someone else selling it under "your name". If its so obvious, why is this a problem?

Customers deserve some degree of consistency in the products they are receiving. Is it ok for someone to call their millie "AWE Rouge." If they can confirm it's origin in the hobby to my colony, then no it's not wrong. If they just think it's similar or maybe even they think it's identical, but it's known lineage is not to my colony then YES it's wrong to mislead the customer. Say what it is "similar" ""Looks to be identical"" Opinion is not fact.[/

This actually leads more to the topic of the thread, which is lineage. In your own words, essentially no one can be guaranteed of lineage, unless they buy the coral from you, Tyree, or the handful of other vendors who have, what yuo deem to be, the correct product. After that first degree of seperation, it is all heresay and word of mouth, correct? That is why naming and lineage is counterproductive for establishing lineages. There is no real way to cofirm or establish any truth, without conforming to som,e arbitrary guideline.

But, to let me clear the air- you have every right, ability, and expectation to name a "unique" coral you possess, market it appropriately, hopefully have a huge demand, and make a good profit. That is the American way, and if it works for you- kudos. In my own personal and humble opinion, it serves the hobby and consumer no greater benefit. As such prdoucts can only "techinically" be acquired by certain outlets (as specific businesses control the name, the deciphering qualities, and the "verifiable" stock), I see that as an elitist attitude. "If it aint mine, it aint real". Borderline monopolistic, also. But miore power to you. Heck, I dont know what AWE Rouge looks like, but it soundsvery pretty. I'm guessing I would like to have one. You know where I can get some?!:D
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12645758#post12645758 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Atomikk
And another thing.. while I am blabbing..

You want to prove lineage? Have two said pieces grow into each other. IF they sting themselves, they are not the same coral. If they grow into each other, then you got a match.

DNA is a beautiful thing.

ehhh...I have a "superman" monti, and a Monti confusa growing into one another, and they arent stinging each other, just pushing. Does that mean they're the same corals?
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12645758#post12645758 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Atomikk
And another thing.. while I am blabbing..

You want to prove lineage? Have two said pieces grow into each other. IF they sting themselves, they are not the same coral. If they grow into each other, then you got a match.

DNA is a beautiful thing.

Maybe not quite, as you can have different morphs grow together that are not the same, and corals like the grafted simplex are around. Maybe just a few exceptions to a generally sound rule/guideline.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12645794#post12645794 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by jmaneyapanda
ehhh...I have a "superman" monti, and a Monti confusa growing into one another, and they arent stinging each other, just pushing. Does that mean they're the same corals?

Well, they are not fused together to form one coral, so the answer is no.

If you take two frags, and place them 2" apart. If they fuse together and form one frag, then you have the same coral. Anything but that you will have seperate corals.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12645758#post12645758 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Atomikk
IF they sting themselves, they are not the same coral. If they grow into each other, then you got a match.

DNA is a beautiful thing.

Not necessarily. I've seen corals that are different genus grow into each other, and not sting. I've seen corals of different genus pass pigment around.
 
Also, I like the corals having names, as it makes it easier to differentiate one from another. Imagine a ccnversation with a friend " I just bought the green monti cap from fragfarmer", "Oh yeah, which one?" If I can put a name to it, it's much easier.
LE status is another thing altogether, and should be limited to the truly spectacular.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12645866#post12645866 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by jtarmitage
Also, I like the corals having names, as it makes it easier to differentiate one from another. Imagine a ccnversation with a friend " I just bought the green monti cap from fragfarmer", "Oh yeah, which one?" If I can put a name to it, it's much easier.
LE status is another thing altogether, and should be limited to the truly spectacular.

I disagree. If the coral is properly identified, there isnt going to be 50 different variants of it. The example you used (M. capricornus) is one of the most ferquently misidentified corals. Essentially any monti that grows in a plate is called a monti cap. There are many species of montipora that plate.

But nonetheless, its really a chicken and the egg thing. Citing your example again, Why did the second person not know which type opf green monti? Because of all the silly names. If there was justr a color and a species, this would not be the case. Or even more so, would you not get the same if he respponded, "purple polyp, green Montipora"? I dont get how hearing a nickname give you a better understanding of the coral than a description.

That being said, the nicknames are here and being used, so right now, that is the way it is. Hypothetically, I wish it were different.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12645784#post12645784 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by jmaneyapanda
Hey Todd:

I hope you weren't upset or aggravated by my post. I did not mean to do so, but instead was merely looking to get the insight from "the horses mouth", so to speak.


Not at all. I think this is a great conversation. I don't find anything offensive about with what you said. I simply don't agree with you.



This is the type of issue I see. You delinietaing feature are entirely subjective and personal. The only difference is a arguably subtle difference in coloration? That can be interpreted, or more precisely, misinterpreted excessively, would you not agree? Besides, with this coral retain this color in my tank? If it doesn't, is it no longer a AWE Rouge?


I guess how arguably subtle the color difference it depends upon whether or not you are color blind. But then again it doesn't matter for this conversation. The AWE Rouge originated (in this hobby) from a colony imported from Kupang in '02. This coral has alot of history in many tanks here in so Cal. Under different lighting, current, water chemistry there are mild variations. It is a coral where you are gauranteed that every coralite has been grown under captive conditions. Now if we can call any coral with similar color and growth form the AWE Rouge great. When the consumer buys they can worry if it is just a fresh cut frag from a recently wild collected colony. They can wonder if the color will hold true. They can wonder if it will live. The name is not patented. Like I said before .. it is a matter of ethics or morals. If the AWE Rouge doesn't retain color in your tank, it is still the AWE Rouge. We just need to compare water chemistry, lighting, cuurrent etc etc and fins out why. Or you bought some other coral that claimed to be a tried and tested coral in this industry. Bad lineage....!! =)

This actually leads more to the topic of the thread, which is lineage. In your own words, essentially no one can be guaranteed of lineage, unless they buy the coral from you, Tyree, or the handful of other vendors who have, what yuo deem to be, the correct product. After that first degree of seperation, it is all heresay and word of mouth, correct? That is why naming and lineage is counterproductive for establishing lineages. There is no real way to cofirm or establish any truth, without conforming to som,e arbitrary guideline.

They can be gauranteed by buying from a trusted vendor or hobbyist, trading with somone they trust. They can also compare pics I have posted with the pictures from their supplier, or even with the colony they see in a tank. I do believe they can pic up any named coral with some degree of confidence that it is from the proper lineage. Vendors and hobbyists alike NEED to be RESPONSIBLE and NOT Mislead people. Is it fool proof.. NO.


But, to let me clear the air- you have every right, ability, and expectation to name a "unique" coral you possess, market it appropriately, hopefully have a huge demand, and make a good profit. That is the American way, and if it works for you- kudos. In my own personal and humble opinion, it serves the hobby and consumer no greater benefit. As such prdoucts can only "techinically" be acquired by certain outlets (as specific businesses control the name, the deciphering qualities, and the "verifiable" stock), I see that as an elitist attitude. "If it aint mine, it aint real". Borderline monopolistic, also. But miore power to you. Heck, I dont know what AWE Rouge looks like, but it soundsvery pretty. I'm guessing I would like to have one. You know where I can get some

Thanks for your permission =). I don't see it as elitist at all. Nor do I see it as borderline "Monopolistic."

In my own personal and humble opinion, it serves the hobby and consumer no greater benefit. As such prdoucts can only "techinically" be acquired by certain outlets (as specific businesses control the name, the deciphering qualities, and the "verifiable" stock), I see that as an elitist attitude. "If it aint mine, it aint real". Borderline monopolistic, also. But miore power to you.

I do find this to be faulty, illogical conclusions. If you feel that the numerous reason I have offered give the consumer no greater benefit yes that is your opinion. "technically" If lineage matters to you there are MANY honest vendors and hobbyists who have acquired the "AWE Rouge" from me. If anyone would like the "AWE Rouge" and they care about lineage they can find it from numerous sources. I get no kick backs...lol. HARDLY MONOPOLISTIC. "If it ain't mine it ain't real" LOL first: if you want to sell a coral. Represent it for what it is. Be honest. If you opinion is it's the same.. then state that as your opinion. Let the consumer decide. To LIE to a customer is just dumb. There is nothing elitist about making sure you always represent honestly and ethically. Nor is it elitist wo hope other people in this hobby do the same.


I do find it interesting that you seem to be against the attempt (foolproof or not) atgiving consumer consistent choices of tried and proven coral species and color morphs.

Short of DNA testing or something similar... This is all we as hobbyists have. If lineage does not matter ... Just buy the pieces that you think are pretty...


BTW none of this is new. Look at Guppies, Dwarf Gourami's, Cats, Dogs, Betta's..etc etc etc... The subject matter ...... CORAL... is however NEW.


BY the way.. I enjoy fun logical debate. hope I do not come off angry. I am not..

l_4dbdca82e9f82461fb89e278f50656a9


l_0fb2d9ba72b8553d1c0d667bd9e6e1a9


There you go
 
Then may we try this?

jmaneyapanda and any others of the same point of view: you seem to have clear ideas and opinions on the subject, please see below:

In a perfect world, how would you have things? Are all named as scientically as they were a few years ago like the ubiqutous "acropora sp." we used to see so often? Anyone notice we don't see that anymore, funny isn't it? Or to the exact definition? How would one identify and refer to one Blue Tortusa form another, without monikers evolving?

It seems lineage has been understood, I would like to speak of the more general "to LE or not to LE" question, as Atomikk has said.

Are all corals to be the same set price, or is there room for different price points from the common to the extravagent, or is it more of a "labeling" thing?

The main problem and issue I see with those who are very anti-LE/Naming, they never state WHY or give thier opinion on HOW things should operate. Now it appears quite often in these dissussions a common thing happens: LE's are mentioned, they are denounced for "elitism", and discussion stirs some actual thought about what it means to be a reefer, eventually the assumptions get to people and the topic is lost. As it has happened here, it is always the LE crowd that is on the defensive, whereas opposed to the idea are never challenged.



Lets try a little shall we? It will help me futher understand your point of view, and others who share it, which will aid all of us to start to see the middle ground we will come to most likely occupy in the end.

Disclaimer: These are meant to be thought provoking questions that will allow you to think about and explain your point of view, and are not personal attacks nor labeling. This has been a very informative, interesting, and productive discussion, thank you!! I hope we can continue to explore WHY people feel strongly about these issues to better understand each other.

Why is it bad in our Capitilist based market economy to have different price points and levels of quality? Disregarding however subjective that quality to be currently. Why is this any different to other collecting or limited editions?

Please explain your definition of "elitism", and exactly which "person", "group", or "population" claims to have the right, entitement, or obligation as such to have power or control of another population? If power and control is important how do we fairly consider those who make a living within this "hobby" of ours. In other words, what is this power, who has it, and who doesn't have it?

If ones does not believe that a piece may be "Limited" as there are "many other fish in the sea" and that they are the same, who may this group be holding a monopoly? Who is exactly holding "ALL the tea in China?"

Please explain the worst case scenario you see if the current trend continous, ie: slippery slope. In other words, convince me why this is bad for the hobby or our reefing culture.

If it is fair to assume if this is "elitist" and "monopolistic", would it be fair to assume those who are against it are egalitarists in which the only "fair" solution is Social equalism?

Which according to Wikipedia: (I know not the most academic of resources, but usually have straight forward definitions that are easy to find),


"Social equalism is a manifestation of equalism that seeks to end all unequal treatment of people through the elimination of capitalist competition"

This seems the natural evolution of such elimination, to create a fair and level playing field for all which is simple and logical, no?


Sorry if this is a little more "philosophical" than we get usually, but I am trying to fully understand the values, core beliefs, and assumptions of the hobby, that those who hold this opinion have, and value your opinions.
 
Last edited:
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12649185#post12649185 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by dots
Then may we try this?

jmaneyapanda and any others of the same point of view: you seem to have clear ideas and opinions on the subject, please see below:

In a perfect world, how would you have things? Are all named as scientically as they were a few years ago like the ubiqutous "acropora sp." we used to see so often? Anyone notice we don't see that anymore, funny isn't it? Or to the exact definition? How would one identify and refer to one Blue Tortusa form another, without monikers evolving?
The uber science names need to stay. Funny? No naming every coral after members of comic books, and ice cream flavors is funny...There are definitions, the taxonomists have laid it for us. It's up to us if we chose to pick up a comic book instead :/ Differentiating one blue tort from another could be done the same way they are now, and is a bad example as it does deserve an A for effort at letting the collector no exactly what it is, again, instead of looking up your DC to see what kind of Acropora an Incredible Hulk could possibly be?

It seems lineage has been understood, I would like to speak of the more general "to LE or not to LE" question, as Atomikk has said.

Are all corals to be the same set price, or is there room for different price points from the common to the extravagent, or is it more of a "labeling" thing? Sad but true the market will set the price as I think we can all agree. It is just unfortunate to the unsavy novice/beginner reefer somtimes. Where I can only speak for myself but feel like a lot of good people are being taken. Especially when you find out exactly how much these LE's were actually aquired for, then to see a 1/2" fragment chipped off of a 6x6" colony and turned over to 1-3x the price for which the got the colony was purchased for..Which, will not promote comradery but I fear degrade the potential for it. What many of us seem to forget or not recognize is that whatever someone got back in 04,05 down in So Cal where there is an obvious buzz regarding the hobby; another box was probably shipped to some mom&pop petstore up in some remote NW town that was 1of2 or 3 collections but when Fred up in the NW bought his, he wasnt big on handing out names for his sticks..So then we are to believe that it must a one of a kind, cuz Fred wont say anything different becuase he doesnt even have internet up there ;)
The main problem and issue I see with those who are very anti-LE/Naming, they never state WHY or give thier opinion on HOW things should operate. Now it appears quite often in these dissussions a common thing happens: LE's are mentioned, they are denounced for "elitism", and discussion stirs some actual thought about what it means to be a reefer, eventually the assumptions get to people and the topic is lost. As it has happened here, it is always the LE crowd that is on the defensive, whereas opposed to the idea are never challenged.



Lets try a little shall we? It will help me futher understand your point of view, and others who share it, which will aid all of us to start to see the middle ground we will come to most likely occupy in the end.

Disclaimer: These are meant to be thought provoking questions that will allow you to think about and explain your point of view, and are not personal attacks nor labeling. This has been a very informative, interesting, and productive discussion, thank you!! I hope we can continue to explore WHY people feel strongly about these issues to better understand each other.

Why is it bad in our Capitilist based market economy to have different price points and levels of quality? Disregarding however subjective that quality to be currently. Why is this any different to other collecting or limited editions? It's not, and when things go foul, things get ugly, then eventually things get fixed..I think were headed into the things get ugly stage..

Please explain your definition of "elitism", and exactly which "person", "group", or "population" claims to have the right, entitement, or obligation as such to have power or control of another population? If power and control is important how do we fairly consider those who make a living within this "hobby" of ours. In other words, what is this power, who has it, and who doesn't have it? I dont think my definition is any different than the standard definition of the term. You can't pin the term on the product, but the people who buy them and chose to act smug, or elite over someone else. I think that term is best coined towards certain individuals opposed to a certain collection of corals.

If ones does not believe that a piece may be "Limited" as there are "many other fish in the sea" and that they are the same, who may this group be holding a monopoly? Who is exactly holding "ALL the tea in China?" They dont, and I think slowly, ever sooo slowly, people are realizing other avenues of obtaining exotic specimens. I think we all can agree, all exotic shipments dont go through Bob's LE service, we supply Bob's LE service which he in turn supplies those who seek him out..
Please explain the worst case scenario you see if the current trend continous, ie: slippery slope. In other words, convince me why this is bad for the hobby or our reefing culture.Cant recall a more consistant period than as of late, which something other than this topic or a sublet of it has created so much animosity, feeling of contempt, rivalry, and scrupulous moral and ethical dillemas all in one lovely package..have you?

If it is fair to assume if this is "elitist" and "monopolistic", would it be fair to assume those who are against it are egalitarists in which the only "fair" solution is Social equalism?True?Not necessarily but, fair? Yes ;)

Which according to Wikipedia: (I know not the most academic of resources, but usually have straight forward definitions that are easy to find),


"Social equalism is a manifestation of equalism that seeks to end all unequal treatment of people through the elimination of capitalist competition"

This seems the natural evolution of such elimination, to create a fair and level playing field for all which is simple and logical, no?


Sorry if this is a little more "philosophical" than we get usually, but I am trying to fully understand the values, core beliefs, and assumptions of the hobby, that those who hold this opinion have, and value your opinions.

In good spirits, gave it a go dots :)

-Justin
 
Back
Top