Tony:
There are some "over-sized egos" among the supposed gurus in our hobby. And they all have things to add, that help us.
And I can tell you from knowing Sprung, Borneman, Goemans, and others that it seems more important to some of them to offer a different,opposing viewpoint, rather than an original thought - or heaven forbid to agree that the other "leader" in the hobby is right!
The problem is that human ego often gets in the way of sincere, pure dialog.
And, many, many times the castigated method ( in this case...DSB) is blamed for a tanks woes - when a thorough analysis would reveal that there were other factors which caused the underlying problems to point the hobbyist to the "bad old DSB".
I have seen "bare bottom" tanks that have all of the same issues of hair algae outbreaks, are difficult to maintain chemistry, etc. - but I don't tell the owner that they can't possibly be successful using this method.
Again - as I stated earlier, there are many roads to success. Pick the one you like. I have had using DSBs , and tanks without them - both do well, given they are managed in accordance with the perameters we create when we choose the given methods that we do. Just different - not really better or worse.
I am sure you have known of a hobbyist that set up a tank, and just could not keep it happy and healthy...? Yet, when you talk with him/her about what went wrong - it was a puzzle? This is the defining moment when we all tend to "reach for the blame jar" and pull out something anecdotal, without real proof - we just guess.
The tank featured in the 2001 MACNA conference program was one of mine. It was the poster, program cover and so on I just took it down 2 years ago to move into a new house. It had been set up for 7 years, heavily stocked DSB, no problems - but......................I am just "one guy"..........
Now - enough of the hijacking - I did not want to lose the focus that this is Alan's tank build thread
- Sorry Alan
T
T