I am not looking for this to turn into a discussion of why a person should quarantine or the right or wrong or whatever. That's not at all the point of this. I am asking because I know people on here who have said they don't QT and have never QT yet they've had (or seem to) very good success with fish. I'd like to know the long term success of people who choose not to QT. How old are your oldest fish and why do you think you have routinely dodged the disease bullet?
Thanks so much.
I only started in aquariums in Feb 2016, so new to all this, but it's funny because I have been looking at getting a small Red Sea Nano or E series (I know not cheap but I just love them!) to use as a QT tank.
I have been debating this for a month or so and the reason is because I clearly know it's the correct thing to do. But I don't really want to, because most of the time the tanks going to be empty of fish and then there is the maintenance for something not being used.
I was about to ask the exact same question as this, how many people actually do it? I know that I should do it for all the reasons stated, even being new, but in reality how many do?
I suppose if loads of people have never had problems, it sort of justifies not having a QT in our minds (because we don't really want one), but in reality it's just a matter of time until you have a problem, so it's just a gamble.
I think those of us not using a QT know we should get one and use it and are just trying to justify not having one.
My LFS here in the UK seem to be quiet good in that they won't release fish until they are happy they are ok (and until they know you, they vet everyone to make sure fish are suitable for your tank size etc which was very annoying in the early days). So I get a certain amount of reassurance from this but not complete.
I am probably rambling here but in summary I know i should use one, I probably will get one, I don't really want to but if I don't it will be my own dum fault if something happens...