Gary Majchrzak
Team RC
well... here's my point, E... (bear with me!)
1) Wouldn't the Mg P treatment skew the matted PVC results? (For better or worse the answer is YES)
2) Killing off Bryopsis is well and good but this thread is about lowering PO4 levels in a marine system. Comparing the two is kind of like comparing apples and oranges. Mg can kill Bryopsis but LaCl3 limits PO4 (thus limits all types of nuisance algae growth)
3) I've used Mg (Tech M) on Bryopsis but the treatment was more detrimental to my aquarium animals than properly administered LaCl3 treatments....
so nowadays I choose to go after the biggie... PO4.
Significant levels of PO4 inhibit calcification in scleractinian (stony) corals and that's what this thread is about... reducing PO4 with Lanthanum chloride.
Limiting algae growth via LaCl3 is a side benefit.
1) Wouldn't the Mg P treatment skew the matted PVC results? (For better or worse the answer is YES)
2) Killing off Bryopsis is well and good but this thread is about lowering PO4 levels in a marine system. Comparing the two is kind of like comparing apples and oranges. Mg can kill Bryopsis but LaCl3 limits PO4 (thus limits all types of nuisance algae growth)
3) I've used Mg (Tech M) on Bryopsis but the treatment was more detrimental to my aquarium animals than properly administered LaCl3 treatments....
so nowadays I choose to go after the biggie... PO4.
Significant levels of PO4 inhibit calcification in scleractinian (stony) corals and that's what this thread is about... reducing PO4 with Lanthanum chloride.
Limiting algae growth via LaCl3 is a side benefit.