chrishayes
New member
You left out one of the biggest advantages of LEDs over MH and T5-that is heat put into the aquarium. Since the lights are not 30' above the water the the heat transfer from those ligth systems is considerable. since swithcing to LEDs from T5 and MH My room temp has dropped 4 deg and the tank a 6deg.
The energy saved in this manner is part of the equation factored into the initial cost of the LEDs.
Yes all the lighting for the marine industy has come from other sources, but leds can and are made in just about every available temperature. As far as high intensity LEds are concerned three watts per diode seem to be plenty. I dont know what intesity it would take to light a 50 sq ft section of space but most aquariums are less then 10 sq ft.
Sometimes industry needs to recoup their investment faster then a hobbiest, afterall we not catering to stockholders and a board. Therefore, the use of flourescent gives a quicker return on investment. It also doesnt matter that if the T5 lights over a warehouse lose 1/3 of thier intensity or shift color in 8 months. That is what LEDs are supposed to prevent. Will it work that way? I hope so. I can wait the 6 years it will take to recoup my investment. Thats why I got them.
You make a good point. But my point is that until COMMERCIAL use is in play, then the tech is not going to get progressed to the point of being reliable and inexpensive. I admire those that are blazing the path in their basements and garages but just like the computer, its gonna take an IBM AND Apple to realize the goals above. Without the deep pockets and competition prices dont get push down and technology doesnt get pushed up.
BTW, pointing a small fan at the water of a tank with a MH more than takes care of any heat issues for many smaller and mid-sized tanks.
Exactly, and this is much more common these days than in the past. I mean, we dont have 12 maxijets for in tank flow anymore along with homes having ac and efficient heating that doesnt blow right out the window cracks. THe lights are about all we have to cool these days. Ill be happy to knock that off too once LED or some other tech comes along jsut like the rest of us but until then a fan is all I need for a 250w halide.
So, it appears the question isnt so much will LEDs grow SPS, its one of will the LEDs manufactured now be able to compete with the reliability of MH and T5. If so many other applications can use LEDs (traffic lights to televisions) and get nearly flawless service from these items for tens of thousands of hours, why shouldnt the lights we buy today do the same?
It was stated by chrishays in an earlier post that most of the lighting components come from commercial applications ( I tend to agree). With that in mind shouldnt the systems we get rival the other commercial applications for longevity and reliability?
These ites that you speak of do have led degridation, its just happening so slowly that you dont notice it. In a life support role, the degradation is unacceptable and thats what is holding me from using them.
Nobodys questioning if led's work. There questioning that led's do not last there said 10 years of useable light. I've read numerous reefers using led's say they will get the initial investment back after 3 to 4 years of use. After 3 -4 years you have to replace each bulbs and possibly heat sinks to whatever. Where is the savings?
Bingo