Jim, Jim, Jim, I know Bill very well. He lives by my place, I will talk to him as well tomorrow. In the mean time I will get the picture of my Kill-o-Watt & show you the power drawn by driver for 12 LED's.
Either case please understand AC input to the driver to DC output to drive the LED's.
So does that mean all AC to DC will draw more power?
Does this mean that my MP40 draws 2.5 and is using 300+ watts, not the 40 watts they claimed?
![]()
Here you go guys. This is the current consumed by
![]()
For
![]()
In case I did not mention earlier, I love the lighting everything set aside.
Why would people not want the most efficient light source?
Cause look at the price of leds? 700 bucsk for a good one to light a decent tank. so now i have to take a big loss and sell my mh and spend MORE money on the new led fixture TO SAVE FREAKIN 6 WHOLE DOLLARS A MONTH? while people are prancing around about all the money they save and its olny 6 bucks? how many years is it gonna take the 700 dollar fixture to pay for its self?
I don't argue with anyone here that anyone wouldn't want the most efficient method. Yet, I do argue that many people want the "latest and greatest" to stroke their ego on here -- a "mine is bigger than yours" of sorts.
With the way technology evolves and how there are many ways to skin a cat, pick a method that works for you and your tank. I've personally tried both methods with a MH and Par 38 LED and much prefer the MH for my tastes and personal use, but it doesn't mean I need to flame people for their methods just to make myself feel better.
Sorry, but when the first several pictures you post are of current again, when we are curious about watss, that is what happens.James, you got to learn some patience buddy LOL
With the posted links I now feel skeptic something could be wrong on my driver. I'm not sure, I have 3 gadgets confirming the same numbers. The driver certainly gets hot, but not screaming hot. I will be picking up new drivers for the other 2 sets this week, & I will be able to truly compare. Thank you for all the supporting links.
Your calculations are wrong and I have no idea what is drawing those watts, but it should not be that high. Looking at the meanwell driver it says that it will accept 100-240VAC and 1.1 amps. Looking below it puts out 48V at 700mA maximum. So if driven at full power 48Vx.700 Amps=34 watts. You only get charged for the watts going out, not the max volts and amps ratings.
This site has it down as 33.6 watts consumed:
http://www.trcelectronics.com/Meanwell/lpc-35-700.shtml
Here is a calculator:
http://www.jobsite-generators.com/power_calculators.html
What are you paying for an electric rate and are you in a hot area?
For comparison, my halides and led actinics cost less than $12/month to run and my skimmer costs less than$2 a month. An AI fixture would save me $60 a year in electric and $120 in bulbs, for a total of $1260 over 7 years. Even buying all my equipment new at $800, an AquaIlluminations setup still comes in more expensive at at least $2100.
LEDs can save a good amount of people alot of money, but blanket statements that they will save everyone money and pay for themselves in a few years cannot be made. In a few years, when that AI comes down by half? Then it will apply to alot more people.
Hi,
I have been working in power supplies almost 25 years and never see any fly-back switching power supply (or call buck driver) used that much input current (1.33A) at 110VAC to driver 34watt load. The input current normally increase per output load usage but it also increase by output shorted. Please check your LEDs solder carefully to make sure you don't have any shorted from + or - to the chassis ground (MH reflector). The best way is using ohm meter to check at each LED from + to MH reflector and from LED - to MH reflector.
Goodluck
There are many 120 watt (119x1 watt, 112x1 watt) imports on the market for around $200. What's the price issue? AI is currently <$600 to cover around 24" x 24".