Not hung up or upset, again if you read my post, I stated Reef Dynamics was a great skimmer, I was disagreeing with the other poster's statement of not a brand for $200-$300 range that performed as good or better. Then you piped in with your $.02.
Obviously, you don't know your skimmmers, as what I showed is not an XP, it is an SRO.
You are correct, air alone does not make a great sikimmer, but I just proved that the hybrid design of my SRO is very good at making a "stable, pulsing foam head" as you put it, BY DESIGN from the "man behind the curtain" at Coralvue. More air, is always better, if you design the skimmer body in proportion to the intake volume of water, or could even fall short. As ************ states
HERE on the Warner Marine skimmers, "given the choice between air volume and contact time we'll take the extra air any day of the week".
Have a good day also...:wavehand:
You didn't really "prove" anything. A picture cannot convey a stable foam head, only that you can make one, as all skimmers can. A 10 - 15 minute video...maybe. I didn't even say that
your skimmer couldn't make a stable foam head, only that the R&D of copycat designs don't achieve the results they often try and mimic from the original design.
I also can't read your link because the address of where you're trying to direct me is invalid.
You seem to be hung up on my Wizard of Oz reference to the "man behind the curtain". I can't take credit for that one. Also, for being so knowledgable about skimmers you didn't recognize that Reef Dynamics uses what is arguably the most recognized skimmer pump in existence....Eheim. As for me not knowing skimmers...au contraire mon frere. I've had more skimmers than I care to admit. They all pulled skimmate...some are just better at it than others. I still stand behind my statements. Whether you have a SRO, SRO XP, or any of the others I may have had is irrelevant. The OP asked if anybody has had experience with Reef Dynamics skimmers.
You're the one who chimed in plugging your SRO by not agreeing with someone's statement because you subscribe to the "more air is better" camp.
I, however, have had a Euro Reef skimmer when I first got into the hobby. It was an INS80 on a 40 gallon breeder and worked great. In fact, I didn't know how good I had it because it was my first skimmer. I've also had an ETSS 900 XR that pulled more skimmate than anything I've had to this day. It was on a 150 gallon reef tank and pulled a solid gallon of skimmate per week. In my current build thread I asked people which of the skimmers I listed would be good for my upgrade. I didn't want to continue with an ETSS because of the power consumption and large external footprint it requires. I went with an SRO XP temporarily and developed surging (even with stable water depth per the distributor's direction) and it would never stop skimming...which is a clear indication that you're skimmer is not up to snuff for your system...even though it's rated for it with nothing else changing. After a lot of research on this board and others I decided that I would explore going back to Reef Dynamics, specifically the INS350E. I was also thinking about some others like the the ATB 1050a, Alpha Vertex 200 or even maybe going to a Beckett skimmer. I was starting to realize that cones probably needed to be bigger than what they are rated for because I was experiencing problems. This was re-affirmed when I saw Jeff Macare's video on Youtube mentioning that a cone would work well if it was a very large diameter and very tall. I decided that I was not going with another cone so I eliminated them from my list. My budget kept my dream skimmer (Bubble King Supermarin 200) out of the question. I was ready to pull the trigger on the Reef Dynamics when a Bubble King Supermarin 200 showed up on the Used Equipment Forum for less than what I was about to pay for a Reef Dynamics INS 350E. Since the skimmer was in excellent condition and only a month old I jumped on it and it's sitting in my garage in a vinegar and RO bath right now....see thumbnail
/Users/alextjoumakaris/Desktop/IMG_0232.JPG
After a lot of research and talking to many people that have owned the BK I was confident that this would be a great, balanced skimmer for my tank. If I didn't get the BK, you can even read in my build thread that I was leaning toward the Reef Dynamics skimmer. If you include the link you tried to post, I'll read it, however I'll never agree that more air is better than contact time because I've seen first hand to the contrary.
You keep thinking that I'm trying to flame you for some reason, but started this debacle by rebutting and saying I was full of hot air and only worth 2 cents, when everything I said was based off experience, first hand knowledge and quite a bit of sound, industry supportive information. What kind of reaction did you expect from me? This is a discussion about Reef Dynamics skimmers. If you haven't owned a Euro Reef or Reef Dynamics, then what are you bringing to the table for the OP who asked for people with experience to offer up information in the first place?
You started this by disagreeing with someone and plugging your skimmer due to air draw. If you've owned a Reef Dynamics or Euro Reef offer up an experience other than the opinion that you don't like where the water output is situated. If not, what's the point?