Silent and Failsafe Overflow System

It is complicated. If you can not keep the flow constant into each of the boxes they will keep getting out of tune. To illustrate image the tank can tip. Now adjust it level with half going to down each. Imagine it tips a little. The higher siphon will break and cause a vortex and noise. Tip some more and the all the water goes into the other box. Open channel may vortex or it may siphon and break the siphon and repeat. Who knows? There are lots of possibilities.
 
WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM THE EXPERTS...before I fill my acrylic 450g DT,(96"X40"X27"h) I just want to be sure, I've got it right.
I have two 24"x6"x6" corner overflows, each drilled with three 1 1/2" bulkheads. I'm planning on using a 5500gph hammerhead pump for returning water from separate 150g sump,and 120g refugium,(each fed by 1 overflow) in addition to two 20-30g random surge tanks (some of the pump output will be diverted to the skimmer/surge tanks/reactors/frag tank)....From all the flow charts I've seen, the 1 1/2" plumbing should be more than adequate to handle the flow, from the pump and surge tanks...NOW THE QUESTION...for that extra measure of safety, should I redrill 1 hole in each overflow, to use a 2" bulkhead and piping, and if so, should it be used as the siphon, open channel or emergency standpipe?

Thanks, Alfie


.

Alfie,

The system is fairly stable over a broad range of flows. However, predicting stability in a surge system is tough. If you are going to enlarge a bulkhead and standpipe, it should be the open channel.

Reasoning:
The siphon rate is dicated by the amount of head that pushes against the siphon standpipe. When the siphon rate changes, the so does the water level in the overflow box that feeds the siphon. If you stop and think about this, the 2 parameters (height of water and siphon rate) are connected in a feedback loop. One directly affects the other.

So imagine a system that is set to stable at the lowest flow rate. That occurs when BOTH surges are filling and not flowing into the tank. THIS MUST be the callibration point. If it is not obvious why, then I can explain.

Now imagine the worst case flow: BOTH surges firing at the same time. We don't want the siphon rate to increase significantly, otherwise when the surge wanes, the siphon my not react fast enough and will overshoot the needed flow. This will cause intermitant flushing. Depending on the rate of surges, the siphon may never fully recover to a stable state.

How do we fix the issue? If we increase the capacity of the open channel, then it will resond quicker to the surge flow and decrease the chance of the siphon flow rate reacting to the surge.

Secondly, the open channel may need to drain into the dynamic area of the sump and not the inflow compartment that runs at a fixed height. Changes water level of the inflow compartment of the sump will also affect the siphon rate. The inflow compartments baffles need to be large enough that the surges don't cause significant changes in height, or they need to be routed to another compartment of the sump.
 
BEAN, THANK YOU, SIR! Just the man, I wanted to talk to! (figuratively speaking)... It took me a few minutes to figure out how to re-drill the holes to make them bigger (made a template from some scrap plexi) but it's DONE, 2" bulkheads are in, will pick up the rest of the plumbing at HD, tomorrow. Only need 450g of RO/DI water and I'm 'ret to go'!




.
 
@wbstyles:

I am not sure what "lots of flow" is :)

You may have issues getting siphon overflows on both sides of the tank balanced. There are too many variables to be able to predict what will happen. There is simply no way to ensure that BOTH boxes always get the same ratio of flow from the return pump.

With regard to the dimensions of the overflow boxes and the wier height in relation to the trim, that was all covered in the first post of the thread and on the article on my website :) Reading both will help you to understand how the system operates and what decisions need to be made.
 
Hi T-Hunter

Malcomm -
You mention that on restart that the open channel flushes/gurgles while the full siphon remains locked. Unfortunately, once the flushing is occurring then you have alleviated a great deal of the pressure (hydraulic head) on the full siphon - so it can then never purge itself.

In the case where you then close the secondary (open channel) line - you can accomplish it. This is REALLY good news. By doing this you put enough pressure on the full siphon to kick it in. Even with the back up engaged.

In your case (due to the T) and horizontal connect into the skimmer, you have a challenging purge - but not to challenging since you have demonstrated that it will indeed purge. So you would need to figure out how to give it more advantage. These are the things I would try in order:

1. Be sure that the full siphon line is a small amount (no more than 1/2 inch) below the water level in the sump.

Adjusted to approx 1/2". Was some 6-7"
Actually made no difference but the theory makes sense so I'm happy with that change.

2. Drill a couple of 1/8" holes in the full siphon line just above the water level. This will help get it started - but obviously water will flow out of these holes - under a lot of pressure once it starts. Be sure that they are directed in a way that you can live with in the sump.

Not going to do this due to other results - read on

3. Probably not an option for you ... but if you could place the full siphon line much lower than the open channel line it give you more time (as the water is rising) as well as more hydraulic head. This could give the full siphon a chance to kick in faster before the flow takes hold in the open channel

Due to vagaries of drilling glass, its between 1/4 - 3/8 lower. can't change it without re-drilling larger holes. Not really an option.

4. A costly approach ($100) was suggested to me by afgun for my system: see http://www.plastomatic.com/arv.html. These are purge devices. You would put this at the top your downpipe in place of the cap. The pipe would operate as an open channel with no water in it. Then as the water came up the float would engage and close the air line thus converting it to a full siphon. It would not highly reccomend this to you since I have never tried it. They are about $100. And you may need to be strategic with where it is placed. So I may just want to igmore this one altogether since this will liekly lead to even more complex engineering to get to work. But in theory it is there.

This might solve the problem but I'm not really prepared to explore it at this stage.

That is what my best guess is on what is going on and a few ideas on how to possibly solve it.

I hope one of these works - let us know what you settle on.

OK a weekend of cutting and trimming PVC. A total bodge job held together with thread tape and Gaffa tape to see what happens with different idea.
* Installed a bigger pump to see if more head pressure would help. It did a bit but nothing startling.
* Trimmed the excess of the pipes to approx 1/2" below sump water level. Again no difference at all.

Lots of playing with different settings and paying attention to what's going on shows that on a power off, the siphon line is sucking back the water from the skimmer branch. It then has a hell of a time trying to purge that air as well as the sump line. During this period the open channel kicks in as well as the emergency and empties the weir. This is all a matter of seconds.
The skimmer branch eventually purges but never regains its original flow, in fact the flow proportion after power off is completely unpredictable. If it starts at all, it may be a dribble or any amount of flow.
Due to the siphoning back from the skimmer, I feel I have three options only. 1/ fit a back siphon prevention valve =- not happy with that as it could fill with coraline etc and fail or 2/ bite the bullet and drill the 4th hole for a dedicated skimmer siphon. As this pipe will be a smaller diameter (3/4 versus 1") combined with the extra flow from the bigger pump, I feel there should be enough head pressure to trigger both full siphons.
3rd option is give up and fit a dedicated pump to drive the skimmer. More electricity etc...

Think I'll drill the hole and give that a go. I can always cap it if it doesn't work.
 
I'm still thumbing through the thread and the article on your website but I'm hoping for a quick answer to a question. How much volume will this setup handle? So far I've found "This setup, with the 1" bulkheads and 1.5" down plumbing will easily handle 2000 GPH silently with plenty of headroom to spare, while still keeping the emergency overflow dry.." How much headroom? I plan on running a Reeflo Barracuda and valving it back to get my desired flow. This will be on a 180G so 2100gph should be a good turnover number but the pump is capable of 4300gph depending on plumbing setup so it would be good to have some idea of the max capacity. Any info is appreciated. If I've left out info that will help with an answer please let me know and I'll post it up.

Thanks,
Mike
 
Somewhere here and on the website (I believe) bean post flow rated for different size pipes vs drop. I think that is the information you are looking for.
 
I suppose it leaves room for an upgrade if I decide I need one.

BTW...I think I found what I need...

Thanks,
Mike
 

Attachments

  • bulkhead_flow_rates.jpg
    bulkhead_flow_rates.jpg
    90 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:
t,

Just a question. If you block both siphons (unlikely until you go on vacation :)) is the open channel enough to handle the rest or does the emergency get some? What diameter pipe please?

Thanks
 
I used 2" on all 4 pipes - but I reduced the 2 siphons and the open channel to 1-1/2'' inside the overflow box. The emegency was left at 2''.

When I said test - I did turn off the ball valves to the siphons as part of that.

T
 
Well, the drain holes are 1.75" so they'll be 1.0" bulkheads. I'll run 1.5" pvc down to the sump. I suppose I'll simply valve the pump way back and open it up over a period of time to watch how well the setup is working.

Mike
 
If you look back a few pages in this thread, you should find a chart that Bean posted that will help you with your question. I don't remember the numbers off-hand.

T
 
Whats up guys. Got a quick question for you all.

The three bulkheads in this original design are 1" and I read that they can handle 5000 gph. If I choose to use 1.5" bulkheads I know my overflow will be able to handle more gph than the 1". Will 1.5" bulkheads and plumbing used beananimal style have a problem handling low flow gph's like 1000 gph while remaining silent and bubble free?

Thank you very much looking forward to my first beananimal overflow!

Kris
 
Cool. I'm going with the 1.5" bulkheads so I have the option for more flow. Thank you!

What dimensions for an internal horizontal overflow should I use? I'm doing 10" tall, 8" deep tanks. The 3 bulkhead holes/overflow will be on a 24" long x 10" tall side pane. Thank you again :)
 
Back
Top