<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14786024#post14786024 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Reefer2727
I guess the ultimate question is how much flow through a 1.5" does it take to accomplish a quiet valved siphon? Assuming the valve is placed as close to the sump as possible.
At full siphon, with both ends of the pipe submerged, it will be silent. And with the full siphon, the flow rate does not determine this. It is the lack of air being introduced into the pipe that keeps it silent. On the open channel, the flow rate does determine whether it is silent.
It is the open channel drain in this system, and its function that make the distinction between this system and the "herbie" system. It is [the open channel drain, that allows the bandwidth (range of flows) in this system, and the stabilty of the water level in the overflow.
I think that the concept needs to be revisited, because it is not all that difficult to grasp, though through many iterations elsewhere, it has become clouded with too much information, and the continued association with the "herbie" method.
For clarity I have quoted BeanAnimals "Reader's Digest" version, it can be found early in the first half of the thread in response to a post by another member:
The readers digest version for melev
Siphons are silent but hard to keep balanced. Anything more than moderate flow in a typical stockman or durso standpipe is noisy.
The idea is to setup a siphon that does not handle all of the flow from the return pump. The second standpipe simply accepts that flow. The two work hand in hand to self adjust over a wide range. The outcome is silent and pretty much airless setup that is self tuning and safe.
The first standpipe is sealed and does not allow air in, that creates the siphon. The rate of the siphon is controlled by a ball valve.
The second standpipe is similar to a durso or stockman. It allows air in. It is quiet because of the very low flow.
The 3rd standpipe is for safety.
Both the second and third standpipe have features that allow them, to become siphons in the case of a backup in the overflow box.
And to answer your question as to pipe size, I.E. 1" or 1.5":
The smaller diameter pipe will mean a few things.
1) The overall siphon capacity will be slightly reduced due to increased friction in the smaller diameter pipe
2) The overall "failsafe" capcity will be sightly reduced due to increased friction in the smaller diameter pipe
3) The overall velocity of the water in the pipes will be increased for the same volume of flow. This may slightly increase the noise made by the water in the pipes.
But MOST IMPORTANTLY
4) The open channel standpipe will have a MUCH decreased capacity due to the lack of air space. As the water to air ratio in a standpipe increases, so does the noise and chance fo gurgling. The larger the diamter of the open channel standpipe, the quiter it will be.
You should be ok with 1" plumbing at the flow rate you propose. However, 1" unions (depending on brand) can be pretty darn restrictive.
You may want to consider leaving the open channel pipe 1.25" or 1.5" though.
I would also like to add, that your flow figures above are way low on what the various pipe sizes will flow at full siphon. I can add some quotes to support that, but I don't think it will be necessary.
Jim