BlueRoofTang
New member
It wont. Think about siphoning from a bucket.....you only need yo get it started. The bottom end does not have to be in the water it does make it quieter though.
There are several potential problems running the siphon to a manifold running reactors. First, the back pressure caused by the reactors will slow the flow and also not be constant, causing the siphon flow to slowly 'drift' over time. The system can accommodate this to a degree but if you're only using 1" pipes for the open channel and dry emergency you can't put a lot of flow down the open channel before it starts caveating and creating noise.
During startup, the reactors will tend to trap air, which may interfere with the development of the siphon. In addition, if the total resistance is too high, the flow will be too slow to effectively clear the air, preventing the siphon from starting at all. It may work, but you can't depend on it. Keeping it like you have it (tee'd off the return) is a better bet IMO.
By leaps and bounds, your original idea in your first post is the better idea, than subsequently suggested following. Run the return over the top, (the best performing return) and plug the oddball hole (with a plugged bulkhead.) You can pretty much be assured that it will work out of the box, without having to mess with it.
Looks like a flood waiting to happen to me. But folks are doing their own thing, deviating from the design, and they are welcome to do so. We cannot test each idea that comes along for flaws and possible issues. We would spend all our time testing these concepts and have no time for anything else.
The box is too small to start with. This type of system (internal/external) was designed 5 years ago. The basic layout and dimensions have been published in this thread several times. It was intended for a rimless tank, that has an external box that is 8.5" tall, and even with the top of the tank. There are no bulkheads between the internal and external. The system worked flawlessly. After all the fabrication work that went into it, the results where not worth the effort required to get there, and had I to do it all over again, I would not have bothered. It just is not worth it, and the goal (to save a couple inches at the top inside the tank) is rather ridiculous. In a nano tank where it would make a difference, this type of system (siphon) is a waste of time.
.
As far as drilling bulkhead holes in acrylic the answer theoretically is as close as you want provided you have room to work. I prefer schedule 80 because of beefiness of bulkhead and the added cost is negligible in my opinion. I surely wouldn't use schedule 40 if I was drilling the bottom of my tank for a closed loop as well.
The other post the overflow position in my opinion depends how the tank will be setup.
I am in the process of having a 180 gallon 6 foot aquarium built and wanted to incorporate a beananimal system. I have been reading through the threads and have a couple of questions. Is the back glass the best place to build the internal weir and external overflow or can you use the side.
What are best dimensions to use for the internal weir and external overflow box. My plan is to have the internal weir built coast to coast along side pane or almost coast to coast if using the the back pane. The water would enter the external overflow box which I am also having built via 3 holes in the back or side glass. I plan to 1.5 inch bulkheads and PVC piping which flows down to my sump.
As I having everything built from scratch including the sump I wanted to incorporate best practices so any guidance would be appreciated.
As I stated in my previous reply, the dimensions of the overflow box depend on the plumbing (and the materials from which it is made. 1.5" bulkheads are pretty big. How much flow are you looking for? Does the picture I posted above help you at all?
Thanks everyone for your advice. My drain lines are planned to be 1.5” in the overflow box…my return lines are planned to be 1” in the upper right and left corner of the tank. The position of the return holes is why I can’t run the overflow “coast to coast”. However, given that the tank will be 7’ long, I suppose I could run it 4 or 5 feet if that would help? Does it help having more water in the overflow box…or less? Or does it not matter as long as the standpipe elbows are at the right height? Or does it help to have the downward facing standpipe elbows relatively close to the floor of the overflow box (like the ¾” distance in the drawing above).…to avoid junk settling on the floor of the box?
Regarding flow, the manufacturer of my tank tells me that each 1.5” bulkhead will drain about 1500 gph given my 6’ drop from top of tank to bottom of sump. Is that not accurate? Given that I’ll have about 250 gallons of water in my DT and another 75 or so gallons in the sump…and trying to achieve about 10X turnover per hour, that’s how I arrived at needing about 3000 gph. I also plan on Tee’ing off one of the drain lines to feed the refugium section of my sump. This is where I got the idea I might need to full siphon drainpipes running at 1500 each…….along with the one open channel standpipe and the one emergency standpipe. I also figured that if I end up needing only one of the full siphon drainpipes, or if having 2 causes an issue, I can just cap one off. Seems easier to cap one off later rather than drill one later! Am I way off in any of my thinking on this?
The drawing of hole dimensions was VERY helpful! So thanks for that. Can I ask if the pipes in the drawing were 1”, 1.25” or 1.5”? If the drawing reflects pipes that are smaller than 1.5”, then I guess I need to adjust a bit for that? Does anyone already have that computed?
Any harm in putting strainers on the ends of the standpipe elbows?
Regarding the Open Channel standpipe, does it help to install an Airline valve on that line….or is fine-tuning of the air flow not necessary with this design?
Thanks again for all the great ideas everyone…and your patience with all my questions!
See my reply above. Bean's system uses 1" bulkheads and flows over 2000 gphI was looking at 1500 gbh flow.