Saltwaternooby
SPS junkie
Why am i not surprised that the price will go up by 50%
Not down the street from Aquarium depot for long.
How can I convince you to move to Roseville? 1. 10 minutes away from yourreef and aquarium depot 2. Water comes from Folsom Dam collected from pure snow - 30 Tds straight from tap 3. Closer to Folsom round table pizza so getting to the mars meeting is a breeze. 4. Haven't had anybody steal my garden hose yet since I moved out of Sacramento. 5. I pay less in utilities than SMUD and sac utilities.
It's $26 for shipping right?
I'm wondering if I'll have enough flow for my tank with the 2 Tunze 6105's
If you check out my other thread , you could never have too much random flow.
The pumps are for nutrient reduction in the display.
I used the koi pond filtration principle derived from city water purification where water flows into multiple chambers but the bulkhead connecting the pipes is located on the top of each chamber. As water enter from one chamber to the next, the heavy particles falls down and get trapped in the bottom of the chamber. By the time it gets to the last chamber there are minimal particles left over to filter. Some people employ filter socks to trap detritus. I just siphon my sumps bottom as part of my water change routine. There is one guy from South America that uses this principle and uses trays of siporax to hold bacteria in the last chambers. There was a thread here somewhere maybe the sps forum or the large tank forum. That is the reason why I use multiple tanks rather than a baffled sump.
The newer vortech has that nutrient export mode that literally suspends the particles trapped in the live rock in the display and the particles eventually exit the overflows. It works better with the mp60es than the mp40. The mp40 is really weak and you won't notice the mode in tanks bigger than 120gallons. I want those particles trapped somewhere but I do not want to have to clean and replace filter socks. I also employ the wet skimming water change technique when I start seeing film algae in my display. There is a guy here named gyr which employed this method. I intentionally raise my sump volume an inch by adding new saltwater in and shoot vodka in the system at the same time. Since I use a cone skimmer the skimmer tends to overflow slowly due to sensitivity with the water level. My skimmer cup drain using a hose that exit the side of my house so my skimmer never overflows. The next day the water level goes back to normal since the excess water is skimmed out of the skimmer. This is how I lower my nutrients. I also use a 250watt metal halide in my chaeto refugium. I harvest a bucket of chaeto each month and donate it to the local Lfs.
View attachment 224570
The pumps are for nutrient reduction in the display.
Hi Mark,
Sorry i use nutrient and detritus/excess food interchangeably. The real nutrient reduction is done via bacteria/carbon dosing/wet skimming water changes and algae export.
Glenn
The pumps are for nutrient reduction in the display.
Thanks Mark. I just want to add lastly that there was a time when I had to remove most of my rocks to try to catch a rabbit fish and to my amazement there was no collection of detritus whatsoever in all eight foot length of the display which I attribute to my closed loop. I run two closed loop in the tank, one reeflo hammerhead and a snapper feeding the chiller. I basically have a pipe running across the bottom of the 8 foot length of the tank that is hidden by the rock work with loc lines pointing down. Flow is literally coming out of the rock work so nothing settles under the rocks and with the help of the wave makers and flow above, all of the detritus and excess food never settles in the display. They just go out of the overflow. I cannot say my sump is cleaner because all of the mulm settles there where I can easily access it for cleaning. I just siphon them Friday nights.
Glenn
comment.The pumps are for nutrient reduction in the display
comment before the justification.The pumps are for nutrient reduction in the display