White Knights....thoughts?

It just my personal opinion, but I don't really care much for the 'designer' clowns and the prices people pay for them is crazy. Everybody wants the newest, latest and greatest. Lets do more than keep up with the Jones', lets get something even more different. I'll just say a fool and his money are soon parted. It's your money and they will be your clowns, if you want them and the money isn't an issue, go for it.
 
Ron Reefman said:
It just my personal opinion, but I don't really care much for the 'designer' clowns and the prices people pay for them is crazy. Everybody wants the newest, latest and greatest. Lets do more than keep up with the Jones', lets get something even more different. I'll just say a fool and his money are soon parted. It's your money and they will be your clowns, if you want them and the money isn't an issue, go for it.
Click to expand...

I agree with you Ron, but I come at it from a slightly different perspective.

I've been keeping marine aquariums for over 30 years. In the 80's, there were only a handful of people who had successfully bred and raised clownfish, and almost no one who sold them (probably fewer than five). The problems were rife, and one of the most prominent was nutrition and flaws associated with poor nutrition. It became apparent that poor nutrition caused poor coloration in the fry, as well misbarring and other issues. Captive raised fish sold at a discount to wild caught fish because they were poorer quality. You were lucky if you got more than $2 per fish (wholesale) even if you culled aggressively and kept only the best. Every now and then if you were lucky you could find someone to take your culls as feeders.

And then a strange thing started to happen. People started buying culls because they thought they looked "cute" or were funny or interesting. Nutrition improved to the point that you COULD raise clowns that were at quality parity to wild caught - but it is still difficult and expensive. But why bother if there is a market for misbars or culls that require half the work, cheaper food, and actually (and here is the shock) can be sold at a premium.

Now anyone with a basement or garage can raise clowns with 50% success rate or higher, give them a designer name, and sell them to someone who thinks they are getting something "special". Misbarring hides the obvious flaws associated with poor husbandry. How can you tell whether you have a good quality fish when they all look like a poor quality fish from a wild caught pair?

Interestingly, it is the exact OPPOSITE of how people buy koi. Champion koi can cost tens of thousands of dollars - but the first criteria is and always has been PERFECT health - PERFECT body - PERFECT quality. Only AFTER these things are present do people start to look at color and pattern.

So if you want to pay $250 for a fish that cost $.25 to raise, and if it makes you happy, go for it. But be honest with yourself about what you are buying. I have paid more for koi that jumped out of a pond, or got eaten by a heron, so at the end of the day you have to somewhat philosophical about it. But I am saddened by the "quick buck" breeders and the depressing effect acceptance of low quality has on the captive-raised marine industry in general.
 
it may be a white night. and you may want a white night.

but do you want to spend that much money on a fish with that many defects. why is it a clownfish with bad decfects is the same price as one that has none. that fish should have been culled, but sense it has the markings of a white night it is $225. as others have said if you like them and don't mind the price or the defects. your fish, your money and your tank.

just know a reg ocellaris is $4 wholesale and nothing is done differently from reg O's and white nights. but people are willing to pay the $221 mark up.
 
BonsaiNut said:
I agree with you Ron, but I come at it from a slightly different perspective.

I've been keeping marine aquariums for over 30 years. In the 80's, there were only a handful of people who had successfully bred and raised clownfish, and almost no one who sold them (probably fewer than five). The problems were rife, and one of the most prominent was nutrition and flaws associated with poor nutrition. It became apparent that poor nutrition caused poor coloration in the fry, as well misbarring and other issues. Captive raised fish sold at a discount to wild caught fish because they were poorer quality. You were lucky if you got more than $2 per fish (wholesale) even if you culled aggressively and kept only the best. Every now and then if you were lucky you could find someone to take your culls as feeders.

And then a strange thing started to happen. People started buying culls because they thought they looked "cute" or were funny or interesting. Nutrition improved to the point that you COULD raise clowns that were at quality parity to wild caught - but it is still difficult and expensive. But why bother if there is a market for misbars or culls that require half the work, cheaper food, and actually (and here is the shock) can be sold at a premium.

Now anyone with a basement or garage can raise clowns with 50% success rate or higher, give them a designer name, and sell them to someone who thinks they are getting something "special". Misbarring hides the obvious flaws associated with poor husbandry. How can you tell whether you have a good quality fish when they all look like a poor quality fish from a wild caught pair?

Interestingly, it is the exact OPPOSITE of how people buy koi. Champion koi can cost tens of thousands of dollars - but the first criteria is and always has been PERFECT health - PERFECT body - PERFECT quality. Only AFTER these things are present do people start to look at color and pattern.

So if you want to pay $250 for a fish that cost $.25 to raise, and if it makes you happy, go for it. But be honest with yourself about what you are buying. I have paid more for koi that jumped out of a pond, or got eaten by a heron, so at the end of the day you have to somewhat philosophical about it. But I am saddened by the "quick buck" breeders and the depressing effect acceptance of low quality has on the captive-raised marine industry in general.
Click to expand...

+1000. I wish we could make this a sticky. It amazes me that people pay a high price for fish that are obviously flawed. In most cases the severe jaw deformity should be enough to turn people away.
 
BonsaiNut said:
I agree with you Ron, but I come at it from a slightly different perspective.

I've been keeping marine aquariums for over 30 years. In the 80's, there were only a handful of people who had successfully bred and raised clownfish, and almost no one who sold them (probably fewer than five). The problems were rife, and one of the most prominent was nutrition and flaws associated with poor nutrition. It became apparent that poor nutrition caused poor coloration in the fry, as well misbarring and other issues. Captive raised fish sold at a discount to wild caught fish because they were poorer quality. You were lucky if you got more than $2 per fish (wholesale) even if you culled aggressively and kept only the best. Every now and then if you were lucky you could find someone to take your culls as feeders.

And then a strange thing started to happen. People started buying culls because they thought they looked "cute" or were funny or interesting. Nutrition improved to the point that you COULD raise clowns that were at quality parity to wild caught - but it is still difficult and expensive. But why bother if there is a market for misbars or culls that require half the work, cheaper food, and actually (and here is the shock) can be sold at a premium.

Now anyone with a basement or garage can raise clowns with 50% success rate or higher, give them a designer name, and sell them to someone who thinks they are getting something "special". Misbarring hides the obvious flaws associated with poor husbandry. How can you tell whether you have a good quality fish when they all look like a poor quality fish from a wild caught pair?

Interestingly, it is the exact OPPOSITE of how people buy koi. Champion koi can cost tens of thousands of dollars - but the first criteria is and always has been PERFECT health - PERFECT body - PERFECT quality. Only AFTER these things are present do people start to look at color and pattern.

So if you want to pay $250 for a fish that cost $.25 to raise, and if it makes you happy, go for it. But be honest with yourself about what you are buying. I have paid more for koi that jumped out of a pond, or got eaten by a heron, so at the end of the day you have to somewhat philosophical about it. But I am saddened by the "quick buck" breeders and the depressing effect acceptance of low quality has on the captive-raised marine industry in general.
Click to expand...

Not trying to make people who love designer clowns feel bad, but to me, a beautiful clownfish is one that looks strong and healthy, and as close to the natural wild form as possible. What bothers me about many designer fish is exactly what you describe above: poorly raised, poorly shaped fish that are propagated solely for novel colors and patterns.

I worry sometimes that the "guppification" of clownfish may actually drive up the demand for wild-caught fish, simply because they look better than so many of the substandard clowns that have been flooding the market. Captive breeding should relieve the pressure on wild fish populations. I realize that ocellaris and percs are bread-and-butter fish for most hatcheries, but that's no excuse for marketing and selling clearly inferior-quality fish.

I can remember a time when ORA briefly offered "stubby" ocellaris...ORA, one of the leaders in the industry, marketing culls? We don't need a saltwater version of the parrot cichlid. :facepalm:

I'm not tarring all designer clowns (or breeders) with the same brush.But I do think that clownfish breeders should follow the example of koi breeders, as cited above, and select their livestock for health, shape, and conformation above all else.
 
BonsaiNut said:
I agree with you Ron, but I come at it from a slightly different perspective.

I've been keeping marine aquariums for over 30 years. In the 80's, there were only a handful of people who had successfully bred and raised clownfish, and almost no one who sold them (probably fewer than five). The problems were rife, and one of the most prominent was nutrition and flaws associated with poor nutrition. It became apparent that poor nutrition caused poor coloration in the fry, as well misbarring and other issues. Captive raised fish sold at a discount to wild caught fish because they were poorer quality. You were lucky if you got more than $2 per fish (wholesale) even if you culled aggressively and kept only the best. Every now and then if you were lucky you could find someone to take your culls as feeders.

And then a strange thing started to happen. People started buying culls because they thought they looked "cute" or were funny or interesting. Nutrition improved to the point that you COULD raise clowns that were at quality parity to wild caught - but it is still difficult and expensive. But why bother if there is a market for misbars or culls that require half the work, cheaper food, and actually (and here is the shock) can be sold at a premium.

Now anyone with a basement or garage can raise clowns with 50% success rate or higher, give them a designer name, and sell them to someone who thinks they are getting something "special". Misbarring hides the obvious flaws associated with poor husbandry. How can you tell whether you have a good quality fish when they all look like a poor quality fish from a wild caught pair?

Interestingly, it is the exact OPPOSITE of how people buy koi. Champion koi can cost tens of thousands of dollars - but the first criteria is and always has been PERFECT health - PERFECT body - PERFECT quality. Only AFTER these things are present do people start to look at color and pattern.

So if you want to pay $250 for a fish that cost $.25 to raise, and if it makes you happy, go for it. But be honest with yourself about what you are buying. I have paid more for koi that jumped out of a pond, or got eaten by a heron, so at the end of the day you have to somewhat philosophical about it. But I am saddened by the "quick buck" breeders and the depressing effect acceptance of low quality has on the captive-raised marine industry in general.
Click to expand...

I completely agree with Ron and you.

I come from the same boat. I remember breeding clowns and trying to get everything perfect. I remember using the smallest rigid tubing in order to clean the bottom of the tank, raising the highest quality algae to enrich rotifers, finding the highest quality parents, etc to produce a perfect set of clowns.


I don't get the fuss over designer clowns at all. I think they are gross and gaudy.

We are in a new era of designer fish and corals though. People seem to be willing to spend allot of money on things that will be dirt cheap later. These people seem to be willing to spend a ton of money but they are out of the hobby after a few years after the inevitable crash. Money doesn't solve all problems. I have known pretty many of these people lately. They get in over their head and spend a fortune on equipment and livestock but never find the time to learn the biology behind this hobby. They seem to jump on every new fad to solve issues without even knowing the long term affects, they don't listen to the experienced people, mix things that should not be mixed.. Basically in two three years they are out.

But hey to each his own I guess.
 
Variations in color and patterns are simply genetic defects that are passed on through selective breeding. When one genetic defect exists, more exist. Only time will tell which other genetic defects will go from genotype to phenotype.

We have seen similar things for hundreds of years in other breeding populations such as in dogs and horses. The difference with fish is that there is no recognized AKC or thoroughbred society overseeing the breeding and development of these "new morphs."

The average person who purchases these animals may never recognize the expression of the various genetic defects that are present. A fish that dies suddenly after a few years or begins to act abnormally is more likely to be (falsely) explained by other reasons as opposed to the genetic flaws present in the animal.

I personally don't have any moral objection to people who breed these fish for oddball coloration and then sell them at a premium. It should be up to the consumer to realize what they are buying and alter their expectations accordingly in regards to the overall health of the animal.
 
Please can someone tell me why you all think just because I don't have the same clownfish as you do that mine is somehow genetically flawed.It swims in water and doesn't seem to have any ill effects. It has a different color pattern then other no big deal. If people want them let them. I totally agree with Cicatrix "We have seen similar things for hundreds of years in other breeding populations such as in dogs and horses." God I'd hate to see if we had the internet when the mule made its first appearance. And I encourage people who read this to write back about there great designer clowns. White knights,Picasso,Wyoming Whites,Onyx,snowflakes and all the rest. Just because people can post half page posts about all the experience in the world they have yet how many of them are marine biologists or geneticist probably not that many. Don't be afraid to show you style!
 
CerealKiller024 said:
Please can someone tell me why you all think just because I don't have the same clownfish as you do that mine is somehow genetically flawed.
Click to expand...

The abnormal color/pattern is itself the genetic flaw.

You can make the argument that your "designer" clownfish is perfectly healthy, and it very well may be healthy, but simply by the fact that its patterning is not the intended patterning of its species is why it is a genetic anomaly.

There is a reason these variations don't exist en masse in nature. Sure, you may see a few abnormal variants here and there (albino, xanthachromic, abnormal patterning) but for the most part they are few and far between. Why? Genetic selection and survivability. The abnormal coloration, for whatever reason, is associated with a decreased survival. Maybe its because the abnormal coloration makes them more prone to being seen by predators. Maybe its because of the unseen ineptitudes which come along with those variations.

One thing we know for certain from science is that genes rarely code for one phenotypically expressed trait. So its reasonable to believe that the gene that codes for enhanced patterning or increased color tones would also code for other genetic variations, some which may not be easily identifiable. Simply selecting one gene to highlight with selective breeding does not negate the fact you are also, by default, selecting for everything else attributed to that gene.

You also referenced my comment to dogs and horses but I think you may have misinterpreted its intentions. I was commenting that for hundreds of years breeders have worked to perfect certain traits in domesticated animals, often resulting in negative (but to many, still acceptable) health problems. So a breed of dog that is manipulated over many generations to have thicker fur, stockier legs and a gentle temperament may also be prone to heart or kidney diseases. We, as a society, accept this because the genetically desirable traits are obvious while the genetically UNdesirable traits may not be so obvious...at least not throughout the entire life of the animal or not outwardly expressed. So you have your playful, furry, curly tailed puppy running around your backyard but hopefully with the knowledge that regular veterinarian visits are necessary to monitor for the known possibilities of disease.

So what does this all come down to?

Well, breeders will continue to "produce" animals that display desirable traits whether they be colors, size, temperament or patterns. These variants will command premium prices in a market that is regulated by supply and demand. In an industry that is not well regulated the onus is always going to be on the purchaser to understand the lineage of the animal and not have unrealistic expectations regarding the health of the animal.
 
As an amatuer clownfish breeder, I would have culled that first fish with an underbite that bad. NO WAY would I put my name on a fish that looks like that and expect $200.

Edit: and FWIW, I LOVE the irregular clowns. I own about every pair of Ocy and Perc known to man, with the Snow Onyx being my favorite. These look like Snow Onyx to me. Beautiful fish, but definately has deformities that should greatly affect its value.
 
wow, quite the soap box some of you have chose to stand on. What's the downfall of having these genetic abnormalities? That the life span of these fish may be shortened? Seriously, what is the life expectancy of the average saltwater fish? We are not the ocean. We're not even close to the ocean. Genetic variation, causing the difference in color of clowns, brings no bad consequences to this trade statistically. People spend whop'n amounts of money at every turn in this hobby and we're all looking for something unique and different. It has a bent face, or swims weird? As long as it is eating properly and seems to live fine in the tank who cares? I think some fish breeders are just jealous that they didn't get the design first in their tank. I fully enjoy my designer dog, designer cat, and designer fish. I really, really enjoy my designer, multicultural adopted children, with their flaws, that even though cost me (in the end) way more then all my pets combined are still my best purchase! (ok, that last part about the kids was a lie, but you get my point) As long as they're not hurting anyone, I say hooray for genetic variation!!
:)
 
hypnoj said:
wow, quite the soap box some of you have chose to stand on. What's the downfall of having these genetic abnormalities? That the life span of these fish may be shortened? Seriously, what is the life expectancy of the average saltwater fish? We are not the ocean. We're not even close to the ocean. Genetic variation, causing the difference in color of clowns, brings no bad consequences to this trade statistically. People spend whop'n amounts of money at every turn in this hobby and we're all looking for something unique and different. It has a bent face, or swims weird? As long as it is eating properly and seems to live fine in the tank who cares? I think some fish breeders are just jealous that they didn't get the design first in their tank. I fully enjoy my designer dog, designer cat, and designer fish. I really, really enjoy my designer, multicultural adopted children, with their flaws, that even though cost me (in the end) way more then all my pets combined are still my best purchase! (ok, that last part about the kids was a lie, but you get my point) As long as they're not hurting anyone, I say hooray for genetic variation!!
:)
Click to expand...

I think this has more to do with education. Some folks don't know the history of these fish. Do what you will with the information, I just think it's nice to have a different perspective. I know that I personally would rather make an educated decision than one based on how cool others think something is.
 
hypnoj said:
wow, quite the soap box some of you have chose to stand on. What's the downfall of having these genetic abnormalities? That the life span of these fish may be shortened? Seriously, what is the life expectancy of the average saltwater fish? We are not the ocean. We're not even close to the ocean. Genetic variation, causing the difference in color of clowns, brings no bad consequences to this trade statistically. People spend whop'n amounts of money at every turn in this hobby and we're all looking for something unique and different. It has a bent face, or swims weird? As long as it is eating properly and seems to live fine in the tank who cares? I think some fish breeders are just jealous that they didn't get the design first in their tank. I fully enjoy my designer dog, designer cat, and designer fish. I really, really enjoy my designer, multicultural adopted children, with their flaws, that even though cost me (in the end) way more then all my pets combined are still my best purchase! (ok, that last part about the kids was a lie, but you get my point) As long as they're not hurting anyone, I say hooray for genetic variation!!
:)
Click to expand...

I can't really disagree with anything you said. As I said above, I have no objection to breeding animals to meet specifications desired by the marketplace. We do it for ornamental reasons (our tanks) and we do it for gustatory reasons (think Purdue chicken). My only "hitch" would be for consumers to be educated about their animals and how they came to be.

When no one is paying attention, history repeats itself.

Twisty Cats
 
hypnoj said:
wow, quite the soap box some of you have chose to stand on. What's the downfall of having these genetic abnormalities? That the life span of these fish may be shortened? Seriously, what is the life expectancy of the average saltwater fish? We are not the ocean. We're not even close to the ocean. Genetic variation, causing the difference in color of clowns, brings no bad consequences to this trade statistically. People spend whop'n amounts of money at every turn in this hobby and we're all looking for something unique and different. It has a bent face, or swims weird? As long as it is eating properly and seems to live fine in the tank who cares? I think some fish breeders are just jealous that they didn't get the design first in their tank. I fully enjoy my designer dog, designer cat, and designer fish. I really, really enjoy my designer, multicultural adopted children, with their flaws, that even though cost me (in the end) way more then all my pets combined are still my best purchase! (ok, that last part about the kids was a lie, but you get my point) As long as they're not hurting anyone, I say hooray for genetic variation!!
:)
Click to expand...

Would you pay $500 for a designer dog with a bad underbite, blind in one eye, and missing half its tail? Of course, you wouldnt.

Would you adopt one for free from an animal shelter? Sure.

The problem I have is not the color, its the deformities. A GOOD breeder can breed the crazy colors but without the flared gills, smushed face, bad underbite, etc. These problems are from poor water quality. If you want to charge $200+ for a fish, spend $50 extra dollars on water/salt and change some water and feed them quality food.

A champion dog breeder would never sell a non-show quality dog for a show dog price.
 
Thanks again for the input guy and girls. I appreciate you taking the time to share your "œthoughts" on designer clownfish, but I think a few of you may have gotten a little off topic.
I know the first White Knight has a slight protruding jaw, but I think it is cool. Makes him that much more unique. He reminds me of Jay Leno. I guess his parents should have culled him too. LOL. I think that's why online sites have WYSIWYG videos so you can see exactly what you are buying.
But in all seriousness I think the White Knights genetic makeup speaks for itself. These babies are combination of my favorite which are a Rods Onyx, Donis Snowcasso, and a Snowflake. I don't think you can get any better. Thanks again for your opinions
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Niven
I'm back....and ready to jump back in, feet first in the deep end, speedo, everything!
Replies
16
Views
222
griss
griss
R
some random questions
Replies
0
Views
86
redseaapples
R
OrionN
Biota Hybrid CB Regal Angel. Please comment
Replies
4
Views
220
griss
griss
E
Refractometer woes….what would you do?
Replies
12
Views
1K
jrill
J
F
Starting tank again
Replies
6
Views
1K
Dr. Reef
Dr. Reef
Back
Top