29 gallon biocube

Thats why it is algae free for now. Cause I dipped it.

Moving all life back to the 14 gallon. Corals and the two fish. So I can do all the water changes I need too on the smaller 14 gallon tank, while the 29 cycles and gets no water changes. No more dips and once the algae is gone and tank has been up a few months move the fish/coral back a little at a time.
 
You do realize that algae is part of the biodiversity in your tank? Unless your being over run with it, it's usually fine.

Some algae isn't a bad thing.

Of course pics would help diagnose whether you actually have an issue, or it's just part of the nature of starting up a tank. It took my tank about 6 months to be algae free, or what I consider to be algae free. There is always some present in places, as long as it doesn't get out of control.


EDIT to Add:
You do realize that corraline is a form of algae? Its a desirable algae, but algae none the less. My point is, some algae isn't necessarily a bad thing.
 
IMG_0688_zpsqba0ddk5.jpg
IMG_0687_zpsthdksnm5.jpg
IMG_0686_zpsgtjthwz5.jpg
IMG_0685_zpsnofbusyr.jpg
IMG_0684_zpsahlr8q4y.jpg
IMG_0683_zpsg0sojdxe.jpg

Need to clean the sides.
 
Wow that isn't bad at all, very small hair algae problem. Run some GFO and most of that will die off. My tank was way worse then that at startup, a little GFO, and in a couple weeks it turned brown and died off. The brown on your sandbed is diatoms and a natural part of a tank maturing.

Your freaking out over nothing. Honestly, that amount of algae wouldn't even bother me. Think of it as nutrient export, once the tank matures some, that will mostly disappear on its own.
 
I worried cause my 14 gallon turned into a huge algae mess that i could not get rid off. GFO don't I need some special filter for that? I got some more CUC so hoping that well help with what is left or at least keep it at bay.
 
GFO to be the most efficient should be run in a reactor, but it can be run in a filter bag in a high flow area of your "sump" area.

Since you have the 29G biocube, until I got my reactor, I put it in a media bag and wedged it in that little compartment between the middle and last chamber. Worked great for what I needed it to do.

Just remember, GFO will help with algae(algae is fed by nitrates and phosphates, GFO helps with the phosphates), but until you get your nutrient export under control, you will always have algae. What goes in, must come out in one way or another.

I don't remember reading what rock you used, but most dry rock will leach phosphates for a very long time, and can become a huge PITA to get under control.
 
I agree with homer - not a huge algae issue, but definitely get to the source which in your case is most likely just immaturity
 
Been doing weekly 5 gallon water changes weekly, Store prepared saltwater and RO/DI from the same store. I use prime weekly.

I have a bag that is suppose to lower PO4. Forgot the name of it.

Next time I go to the saltwater store Ill have the water tested. All I have is API testing kits and I have been told they are not any good.

Just two fish medium size CuC, less then what is recommended that I have added a few at a time. Adding some one more time should finish that out. Several small corals. Most are doing well but very little growth. Normal since this tank has not been set up long.

I am much happier with this one than I was the 14 gallon. I do have the algae but so far it is not taking over the tank. I would like to get one more fish much later down the road cause I want everything settled in. Would love a flame hawkfish as my last add. Trying to make myself wait a year and have the algae completely under control first.

Thank you for all the help. Maybe I should buy myself new testing kits. Red Sea is the one I was told was good.
 
Last edited:
I like red sea kits. Not the easiest to use, but very accurate results. I've been testing ALK so much lately, I need to replace my red sea kit. Thinking about a hanna checker as its a little easier to use and gives a number instead of measuring titrant used.
 
At what prices? $50 or so for the red sea kits should last you a year unless you constantly need to test.

And taking to the store doesn't help much unless they are using quality tests themselves which are not expired...
 
I like red sea kits. Not the easiest to use, but very accurate results. I've been testing ALK so much lately, I need to replace my red sea kit. Thinking about a hanna checker as its a little easier to use and gives a number instead of measuring titrant used.

I wouldn't bother with the hanna. They're usually more trouble than they're worth. The only one worth using is the low-range phosphate one, since no test kit can measure it accurately or precisely. The other hanna colorimeters are just to finnicky to be worth it for something as consistent and easy to test as alkalinity, calcium, etc.

At what prices? $50 or so for the red sea kits should last you a year unless you constantly need to test.

And taking to the store doesn't help much unless they are using quality tests themselves which are not expired...

Yeah I would only take to the store as a double-check if your tests aren't going well. Maybe salifert tests are cheaper? Those are my go-to test kits since they're on the less expensive side of the good test kits. API is usually okay for nitrates, but for alk and calcium, where I want to make sure I'm right, I use salifert. But if Red Sea and Salifert are the same price, then you can't go wrong with either.
 
red sea is a little cheaper if you want all three at the same time. Salifert is cheaper for the individual kits though.

Can't go wrong with either.

Homer - I suggest you read u on here about the Hannah meters. They apparently are a huge pain in the rear since you need the regents and then time it right while calibrating. I would suggest you give the salifert tests a try as they are a bit easier to read then Red Sea.
 
I think either the algae has gave up or my CUC is eating faster then it grows. WOOT. Keeping fingers crossed.
 
So things are doing well. Some algae but not a so much I hate the tank. I had to move all the mushrooms I could to shaded areas they don't like my light. Thinking it is time for something besides my mushrooms. I have a flame torch, a couple zoe( I dont like them.) a small hammer (dont like it) I have a finger leather I like it and a leather cabbage this is not growing. So researching something easy that well like more light then the mushrooms.
 
Some easy, light loving LPS corals.......

Candy Cane coral, plating montipora, duncan, any gorgonian(as long as its not an NPS gorgonian), frogspawn, hammer(there are several types), torch, any type of zoa(from my experience the more color, the more they like the light), gonipora(although some are hardier then others).... bout all I can think of right now.

If you don't like those corals, why did you purchase them? Are you more of a softie person then an LPS(you mentioned you like the leather) person? You could try some GSP(green star polyps), blueberry star polyps, pulsing Xenia, or any other type of softie. Just keep in mind, all those I just named are considered nuisance corals and need a regular trimming to keep in check.
 
If you don't like those corals, why did you purchase them?

I liked the colors but other then that not impressed is why I bought them. I ordered some more soft corals. I do seem to like them best. I really want something that well grow and give less space for the algae to go. lol I was also sort of hoping the clown fish might take to the hammer. But it is kind of small maybe they well when it it bigger.
 
I got a fuzzy leather and some more cloves. They are different colors then the one I already have in the tank.
 
Back
Top