Mmmg: "My posts are an honest attempt to identify the root cause,etc." No one needs you to identify the "root cause" for a transaction you were not involved in. MD clearly states in this thread,"certain restrictions". That is not stated in their return policy. The avg. person will read a return policy and make a decision whether to purchase or not based on that policy, AS I STATED B/4, IT'S NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. You state, "what does it matter if you ship 20 miles or 2000 miles, well , let's see........Plan A - A trip to MD- 45 min. round trip - my tank has lights the same day... Plan B - ship to Colo.- 4 phone calls, 2 faxes, trip to Fedex, 4 days with no lights.Gee, which would be easier??? ........ You are not the problem. Your comments are ridiculous, that's all. I invite MD to define "certain restraints" as once again, THEY wrote their policy, not me. Yes, my immediate problem with my lights is resolved (MD did nothing to assist ). I continue to take issue with a co. that does not honor a written policy, thats' posts are full of vague responses, and do not address directly the issue at hand. My business has gone to their direct competitor, others may appreciate knowing "all is not as stated" with this co. Is that okay with you? Of course not, YOU ARE IN LOVE WITH MD NO MATTER WHAT.......news flash........the facts are the facts. You weren't there. Others beside myself had the SAME issues. MD: Please "clarify" "certain restraints" . Mmmg: "the root cause" as you say, is a co. misleading customers with a return policy that is not honored. The "wants" of the distr/ mfr. are more important than honoring a published policy that a customer has read before purchasing. For some unknown reason, you STRENULOUSLY defend this co. despite the facts... The end result is you just make yourself look foolish. Perhaps you can explain for MD why they don't honor their return policy. Do you work for them, btw????