glassbox-design
New member
corals do get C from their zoox but we are talking system or water levels here where C has a larger effect on bacs...which in turn feeds corals. our tanks are C and N limited.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9110518#post9110518 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by stony_corals
So adding sugar to pappone is more for the bacteria cultures rather than the corals?!?
Again, I don't think our tanks are N limited. Delbeek has shown that there are significant amounts of DON relative to NSW levels, even when employing a Jaubert plenum/sand bed.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9112202#post9112202 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Leonardo's Reef
Like Eric said, the Carbon source is only there to support the bacteria. This to make sure that you don't elevate P and N levels while feeding this. On the other hand, the bacteria also feed the coral. Adding C can be described as indirect feeding.
With my nitrates and phosphates both 0, using carbon and GFO, I think I have a N poor system. Of course this tests are only indications.
Leonardo
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9108825#post9108825 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by speedstar
Procedure: One hour prior to turning off your lights, you have the option of adding Amino acids to the tank*. (For example, 11pm Halides off, add AA’s, 12am, actinics off, then add pappone). Take off the cup of your skimmer, but leave the skimmer running (so you don’t have a massive drop in O2 levels overnight). After the lights are off, start with only a ¼ of a cube per WEEK for every 400 L of tank water (approx 100 gallons). Be sure to measure NO3 and PO4 the next morning so that these parameters don't spike after feeding. You can reduce the amount fed if you are having nutrient problems. Also don’t forget to put the skimmer cup back on the next morning before the lights go back on.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9113137#post9113137 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Flint&Eric
stony-
I'm sure there are tanks out there that arent nitrogen limited but they also probably have elevated levels of po4. nitrogen limitation is a concern in low nutrient tanks that many sps keepers are after.
there are numerous studies that clearly state many coral reefs are nitrogen limited. i dont have the time to post links to the article but I am sure a simple google or "nitrogen limitation reef" will pull up studies backing up what I am saying. Please read the articles posted by meso on the other forum so you can get an understanding of what we are talking about here...i dont know about know what delbeek posted but I think we are talking about 2 different creatures here.
fwiw, plenums would not be much better to foster bac growth as we are talking bacterioplankton in the water column. Past a couple inches it becomes anerobic and is useless to the bacs we are after to eat nutrients.
hth,
eric
You know whats funny? 2-3 years ago the "thing to do" was a fishless sps tank. Now we are looking for ways to dump more food in our tanks.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9113587#post9113587 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by stony_corals
eric, yeah, I'm not saying that coral reefs aren't nitrogen limited. what I'm saying is that it's not accurate to say that our tanks are nitrogen limited. We don't have test kits that measure DON (or any other organics such as organic PO4s). The only data I've seen for reef tanks was published by Delbeek for one of the waikiki aquariums. This data clearly showed that if you take into account DON, that our tanks are NOT N limited. While they may be NH3, NH4, NO2, and NO3 limited.
As far as plenums/DSBs being a better (relative) for fostering bac growth, this is the reason that the probiotic approaches such as ZEO, Ultralithe, Prodibio either have rocks or recommend sand beds... These systems add bacteria cultures and a C source to grow the cultures which ultimately become food for corals as well as consumers of nutrients such as NO3 and PO4. I'd say that this is a probiotic approach as well....