Hey, Bean:
I just spent an entire day reading up to page 29 (725 posts) of your awesome thread. I will study the remainder when I have more time. Congratulations! Very nice work and advice over the years! Your design has inspired me to modify my Nano Cube 28 gal set up, and I will incorporate your failsafe design. My mod-diary can be found here:
http://www.reefsanctuary.com/forums...be-mod-diary-jbj-nano-cube-28-gallon-hqi.html.
Given that your advice over the years has stated that your design can be scaled up or down, do you anticipate that I would run into problems using your design in a 2-tank setup that shares a common sump (as depicted in the second slide of my diary)? Here is the basic design:
1. Nano Cube 28-gallon tank, used as a live reef aquarium, modified with the removed rear sump, with the 3 holes drilled in the back, 1.5" bulkhead and PVC all the way, to accomodate your Bean Overflow Design (including with a Calfo/Coast-to-Coast, Internal over-flow box), draining into a 10-15 gallon sump below (which has a protein skimmer in (yet to be built));
2. BioCube 14-gallon tank, used as a dedicated refugium, modified in the same way as the Nano Cube 28 (with your overflow design), draining into the very same sump;
3. Return flow perhaps a little light, using an Iwaki MD 40-RT external pump (estimated to be returning about 650 gph total to both tanks combined), over the top of tanks (which will have raised hoods), split into two returns, as your setup uses.
Do you see any inherent flaws in this side-by-side tank setup, using a common sump, with your design? Will I run into trouble with the return flow rate being that low? I will augment water movement in the tank with powerheads.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Once again, great work, you are truly inspiring!