uncleof6
Active member
Well I had to look up "laminar" so now I get what you're saying. Does that issue have anything to do with the overall flow? i.e. If im running well under pipe capacity (600gph) of the siphon.
Thanks for saving me a trip to HD.
Oh, and I just though of this...is there some point where the downpipe is too big relative to the return pipe (less head) such that I can create a siphon and successful BA setup? I mean I'll go bigger but I figured it was overkill and more glass stress (bigger holes) for no upside (plan on flow of 500-800).
Flow capacity through the 1" siphon will probably be around 1200 - 1500 max, depending on the length of the drop. So the total flow won't be an issue. However, the laminar flow rate through a 1" air assisted (open channel et al) will be around 50 gph. Rather narrow margin. the 1.25" open channel will give you a bit more flexibility. The other pipes can remain 1".
The system as designed (in bean's thread) will handle a wide range of flow rates from rather high to rather low. However, I don't see a need to increase the pipe size for the siphon and dry emergency since your flow rate will be fairly below the capacity. If you were going to approach 1000 gph or so, I would suggest you up the pipe size on all three. If you used larger pipe @ say 900 gph, the valve would be closed quite a bit, and I don't much like that. 900 gph is where i would run this tank.