Do you think this will flow; what changes would you make?
Im almost ready for glue up. The tank is a RR140; not my first choice in tanks but the used price for a low iron tank coupled with operating costs made it the right choice, so I'm working with what i have. Its mocked up for a duel syphon; I have two valves in the sump so I can keep the skimmer chamber's flow low. There is a hard plumbed constant flow drain, and an emergency drain dumping straight to the sump. The hybrid pump should supply low to mid 2000's gph (1 1/2" pipe, 7' run w/4.5' vert, 4 45"¢ eblbows before to final Tee to 3/4" ARC stock overflow kit duel nozzels that i hope to upgrade) I want room to move up in volume if the system allows. I cut down the top of the overflows and will see if the sump will handle the volume of the overflows without using standpipes. I wish I had room for disconnects but reality is very tight with a 29g fuge draining to the
mechanical sump, and a wc reservoir still to be placed.
With little info to go on, and strictly from what I see, no it will not work properly--if your intention is a BeanAnimal drain system.
Looking at it, you have two siphons, joined together into a single pipe, of the same size, also horizontal runs. The dry emergency, looks to be a single line, but also has a horizontal run in it. Bean's system does not run two siphons, rather a siphon, an open channel (a durso) and a dry emergency. All three pipes must be used, and all three pipes must discreet, and they must be, or they will interact in the wrong manner, and you will have a mess to sort out. (not a flood, just a headache redoing everything.) Variations, of Bean's system, result in "something else." The "something else" should be in threads of their own, unless your intention is to do a Bean system.
By joining the two siphons, you are taking the combined flow from both, and sending it down a smaller line. If the drain system flows at all (does not air lock due to the horizontal runs,) the flow capacity will be hindered by the join. (larger cross-sectional area--2 pipes > smaller cross-sectional area--1 pipe of same diameter.) Never know, it may work, but it is not a good idea.
If you are planning 2000 gph, you need to do some re-studying of the two siphon systems that have been described, do one or the other--exactly as designed, or you are going to be asking for a flood.
Also that pump with the plumbing you are describing is most likely not going to get close to 2000 gph. (running it into a tee, reduction to 3/4" etc.) I did not do all the math, but just glancing at the description, that needs to be rethought as well.