Hi all.
Can someone help me out in understanding the use of u pipe?
I made a 18" dual box overflow for my 65gallon tank. The box that goes inside the tank has two 1 1/2 inch bulkheads and the out side has 3 1 inch bulkheads for the bean animal setup. For the open, partial, and failsafe pipe i was ony going to use 1" stright pipe.
Why do others use u pipe on the open channel and partial? Can i get around doing so?
Thanks for your input.
Hi Mike,
I did drill the tank for two 1 1/2" bulkheads. This setup is much like ghost overflow. The internal box is a tad bit more than an 1" wide and has a weir. When the water enters into it, it then goes to the external box via the two 1 1/2 inch bulkheads. The external box has three 1" bulkheads drilled into the bottom of it.
OK you are referring to the down turned elbows. You need them to be able to start the siphon with out them you end up with a durso stand pipe so if you are talking about just having straight pipes for the drains it will not work.
Thank you! That was the answer I was looking for. I'll get them in there.
It will be a bit tricky to get a 1" open channel to function quietly. Smallest practical size is 1.25" on a 1" bulkhead, and really, the bulkhead should be 1.25" as well.
Not sure your correct on this, but i'll let ya know when I'm done.
Check out all the dual box overflows using the bean overflow.
The smallest practical size for an open channel (aka durso standpipe) comes from the inventor of the durso: Richard Durso himself, direct quote. After years of dealing with these contraptions, I have come to the conclusion that he is correct.
I came up with the concept of an internal/external BA overflow, a couple of years ago, with a water pass through the back glass, rather than using the back of the tank as a "weir." What is it that I may not be correct about? There certainly are not very many of them actually in use...a lot of talk about it however.
Not a good choice of words on my part. What I should have said is that I hope your wrong.What is it that I may not be correct about
Thanks uncleof6. Appreciate the response. I have read thru most of this thread but it becomes overwhelming after awhile. Theres just so much info I kinda get lost as to what I should or should not do. So figuring if I shorten the height of the internal overflow to 4" so the elbows are about 3/4" inch off the bottom of the overflow should work well. Of course I need to measure it out just to be sure. Ive also reconsidered and I will be going full length on the weir and bringing the return line up over the top. Less holes to drill the better. Reading some more and it seems 1" from top of the overflow to top of the tank should be enough to allow plenty of surface skimming into the box and through the drains. And also leave the water level in the tank about an inch from the top. Which should suffice cuz I will be running 2 vortech mp40s.
How does surface agitation by powerheads interfere with surface skimming from weir?The water level is not involved with surface skimming. It is the length of the weir, in relation to the flow rate (head height above the weir) that affects surface skimming. E.G. at a given flow rate, the longer the weir, the thinner (less head height) the layer of water going over the weir, thus the better the surface skimming. That said, if the top of the weir is 4" down from the top of the tank, and the water level 1" down from the top of the tank, yeah, no surface skimming...
Weirs on rimmed tanks are 1.5" down from the top of the tank, even with the bottom of the trim on the outside of the tank. This leaves an inch below the top of the glass, not the top of the tank, while still hiding the waterline. Top of the glass is your "startline" not the top of the tank. On rimless tanks, the distance is usually 1" - 1.5" below the top of the glass, whichever you are most comfortable with.