Silent fail safe for internal overflows? I'm sure it has been done
, I'm also sure there are a million posts in this thread and I'm getting dizzy trying to find one. :headwally:
Can someone point me to an example of Beans overflow used on an internal (through the bottom glass) overflow?
I have a 120 with 4 x 1" bulkheads
Thanks :spin2:
NO that helps.
That does not surprise me on being almost full open, opening it all the way will not help much. The mag 12 needs a minimum of 1.5" inside diameter pipe, (per danner instructions) to get any flow out of it. Additionally, the tee in your return line is acting as a brick wall. Plus you are bleeding flow for the fuge as well.
Wouldn't that be an invitation for snails and fish? Feel free to correct me if im wrong.
i had a question regarding the system, why the use of tees instead of elbows in the drains coming out of the bulkheads?
Thanks
So, the tank I have is the tank I will be using. I can't redrill (tempured)return (freebie), exchange, etc. so I have to come up with a solution. I have a 120 Deep Blue RR with bottom drilled corner overflows. Each corner has a 1.75" drilled hole (1 " ID w/ BH) and a 1.5" drilled hole (0.75" ID w/ BH) for a total of 2 - 1" ID and 2 - 0.75" ID connections. Each corner overflow is an 11 1/2" curve for a total of 23" of overflow.
I would like to turn this tank over as close to 10X/hour as possible. I am not overly concerned with drain noise but am concerned with failsafe and maximizing flow. I have a 40 gallon sump.
Right now what I'm considering doing is going with a a modification to the Bean Animal drain set up as follows:
1 3/4" full siphon stand pipe in left corner
1 1" emergency standpipe in left corner
1 1" open channel stand pipe in right corner
1 3/4" emergency standpipe in right corner
plumbing a mag 12 w/ 1.5" return line externally on the back of the tank. Vertically I'm looking at right at 5', one union and a valve (gate?). Not exactly sure about the top of the return, probably as simple as possible to avoid more head loss.
The reason I want the open channel opposite the full siphon is so that I can get some flow in both overflows.
Please let me know what you think, I'm open to suggestions (other than the ones I excluded in the first sentence!)
Edit to add, if there are higher flow/return solutions that also have failsafes in place I would like to hear them......remember, noise is not much of a concern. For example, 2 0.75" siphons, 1 1" open chanel and 1 1" emergency - would that be more flow (certainly), would it work (I don't know).
I'm not up to speed on the weir lenght requirements, but I don't think I can get 1200 GPH with a mag 12 anyway (headloss)....so what GPH w/ my head loss should I be shooting for? Seems like I need more than a mag 12?Saw this in New to the Hobby, will address here....as well.
NO. The siphon and the open channel MUST be in the same overflow. If they are not, it will be impossible to adjust the system--since the flow through the open channel is controlled by the water level in the overflow, which is controlled by a valve in the siphon line. Using this drain system in two overflows requires that one overflow not have any flow under normal conditions.
Too darn obvious!
You cannot safely run 2 1" siphons and an open channel, with a 1" dry emergency. The idea is redundancy for safety, not for double the flow capacity that your emergency can handle. This is a design criteria: Eliminate all possible problems, no matter how remote, when possible.
Overflow 1: 1" siphon line on .75" bulkhead.
1.25" open channel on 1" bulkhead.
Overflow 2: 1" dry emergency on 1" bulkhead.
3/4" bulkhead not used for the drain system. I assume I could plug this but there wouldn't be any harm in letting it be a "dry" emergency too, no?
Fill the second overflow with fine oolitic sand, with a few inches of water over it, mini DSB. Really worth doing in you opinion?
Subject to the limitations of the single overflow itself, this will handle 1500 gph well. 1200 will be easy for it, and it will be silent, again the limiting factor is the overflow "weir" itself. Therein lies a small issue of needing ~18" of length for 1200 gph--without teeth.
I'm not up to speed on the weir lenght requirements, but I don't think I can get 1200 GPH with a mag 12 anyway (headloss)....so what GPH w/ my head loss should I be shooting for? Seems like I need more than a mag 12?
Most likely not. You mentioned 10x, that would be around 1200 gph-- after you add a sump, etc. I am beginning not too like the mags. Leaning toward Sicce, guess you could run a Reeflo, and really get going....... The weir lengths are approx based on the calculator.
As far as the sand in the overflow, if water is moving over it, you will get "some" denitrification out of it. When bean first mentioned it some time ago, I went HUH? But it makes sense. Just a tiny bucket DSB.
And thank you for responding!! FYI, just to be even more difficult, I asked different follow up questions in the other thread.....:beer: